Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Irace v. Berryhill, 17-cv-1443-pp. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20180427i86 Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO.17), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. 405(g) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On April 25, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. No. 17. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that: The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will
More

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO.17), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42. U.S.C. §405(g)

On April 25, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Dkt. No. 17. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that:

The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will send the claim to an administrative law judge (ALJ) for a new hearing and decision regarding only plaintiff's disability status prior to January 3, 2015. At the hearing, a vocational expert will testify. The vocational expert will be advised to be prepared to provide an explanation for his or her answers to hypothetical questions and to have available, at the hearing, any vocational resource materials that he or she is likely to rely upon.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer