U.S. v. Hess, 18-CR-44. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20180427i91
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 03, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY JOSEPH , Magistrate Judge . The United States of America and the defendant, Scott Hess, appeared before me pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. Hess entered a plea of guilty to the two-count information which alleges violations of 18 U.S.C. 1343. After cautioning and examining Hess under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the guilty plea is supported
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY JOSEPH , Magistrate Judge . The United States of America and the defendant, Scott Hess, appeared before me pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. Hess entered a plea of guilty to the two-count information which alleges violations of 18 U.S.C. 1343. After cautioning and examining Hess under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the guilty plea is supported ..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
NANCY JOSEPH, Magistrate Judge.
The United States of America and the defendant, Scott Hess, appeared before me pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. Hess entered a plea of guilty to the two-count information which alleges violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
After cautioning and examining Hess under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the guilty plea is supported by an independent factual basis containing each of the essential elements of the offenses.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Hess' plea of guilty be accepted; that a presentence investigation and report be prepared; and that Hess be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.
Your attention is directed to General L.R. 72(c), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 59(b), or Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 72(b) if applicable, whereby written objections to any recommendation or order herein, or part thereof, may be filed within fourteen days of the date of service of this recommendation or order. Objections are to be filed in accordance with the Eastern District of Wisconsin's electronic case filing procedures. Courtesy paper copies of any objections shall be sent directly to the chambers of the district judge assigned to the case. Failure to file a timely objection with the district court shall result in a waiver of a party's right to appeal. If no response or reply will be filed, please notify the Court in writing.
Source: Leagle