Egleston v. Berryhill, 18-299. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20181012659
Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 25, 2018
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN L. CROCKER , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Remand, and the Court being duly advised, now grants the motion. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Agency pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings and that judgment be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to readjudic
Summary: ORDER STEPHEN L. CROCKER , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Remand, and the Court being duly advised, now grants the motion. It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Agency pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for further proceedings and that judgment be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to readjudica..
More
ORDER
STEPHEN L. CROCKER, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulation to Remand, and the Court being duly advised, now grants the motion.
It is hereby ORDERED that this case be remanded to the Agency pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings and that judgment be entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
On judicial remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to readjudicate Plaintiff's claim and issue a new decision that proceeds through the steps of the sequential evaluation process, reevaluates Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and, if necessary, obtains additional vocation evidence.
Source: Leagle
