Knox v. Berryhill, 3:18-cv-762-jdp. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20190228f52
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JAMES D. PETERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to affirm, modify or reverse the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, reverses the Com
Summary: ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) JAMES D. PETERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to the power of this Court to affirm, modify or reverse the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, reverses the Comm..
More
ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)
JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to affirm, modify or reverse the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and orders remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292,296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991).
On remand, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate and issue a new decision. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
