Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Waits v. U-Line Corporation, 18-cv-771-pp. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20190410753 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT (DKT. NO. 29) AND APPROVING STIPULATION TO CERTIFY THE RULE 23 CLASS AND THE COLLECTIVE CLASS ACTION (DKT. NO. 30) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On January 11, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of class and collective action settlement. Dkt. No. 29. The parties attached their settlement agreement, dkt. no. 29-1, and submitted a brief explaining why they believe the
More

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT (DKT. NO. 29) AND APPROVING STIPULATION TO CERTIFY THE RULE 23 CLASS AND THE COLLECTIVE CLASS ACTION (DKT. NO. 30)

On January 11, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion for preliminary approval of class and collective action settlement. Dkt. No. 29. The parties attached their settlement agreement, dkt. no. 29-1, and submitted a brief explaining why they believe the settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate, dkt. no. 33. The parties also applied the Rule 23(a) and (b) standards to the proposed Rule 23 class of all hourly employees employed by the defendant between May 21, 2016 and November 14, 2018 and identified in exhibit A to the settlement agreement. Dkt. Nos. 30, 29-2.

The court FINDS that the settlement agreement (dkt. no. 29-1) appears to be fair, reasonable and adequate, GRANTS the joint motion for preliminary approval of class and collective action settlement (dkt. no. 29) and APPROVES the parties' joint stipulation to certify a collective action under 29 U.S.C. §216(b) and to certify a class action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (dkt. no. 19).

The court APPOINTS Michael Waits as class representative of the Rule 23 Class and the 29 U.S.C. §216(b) Collective Class.

The court APPOINTS Hawks Quindel, S.C. as class counsel for the certified Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 Class and the 29 U.S.C. §216(b) Collective Class.

The court FINDS that the parties' Notice of Class Action Settlement (dkt. no. 29-3) is the best notice practicable under the circumstances for distribution to all putative members of the Rule 23 Class and the Collective Class. The court FINDS that the parties' Notice of Class Action Settlement constitutes valid, due and sufficient notice for distribution to the Rule 23 Class and Collective Class Members and ORDERS that:

1. Class counsel shall mail the Notice of Class Action Settlement to the class members within seven (7) days of this order; 2. Putative Collective Class members may file a consent form within thirty days of the notice's mailing; 3. Any individual who wishes to exclude himself or herself must opt out per the instructions set forth in the Notice within thirty days of the mailing of the Notice; 4. Any individual who wishes to exclude himself or herself from the Rule 23 settlement shall be bound by any court order granting final approval of settlement; 5. Any Rule 23 Class member who wishes to object in any way to the proposed Settlement Agreement must file and serve those objections in writing—following the instructions in the Notice of Class Action Settlement—together with copies of all papers in support of his or her position, no later than thirty days after the mailing of the Notice of Class Action Settlement; 6. The court ORDERS that the parties must appear for a fairness hearing on May 8, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. in Room 222 of the federal courthouse at 517 East Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI. At that hearing, the court will hear objections from any Rule 23 Class Member who properly objected to the settlement agreement as provided in the notice, and will make its determinations as to the final approval of the settlement and the amount paid to class counsel as attorneys' fees and costs; and 7. Class Counsel shall file a motion for approval of attorneys' fees on or before a date at least twenty-one days prior to the fairness hearing. Any supplemental brief in support of final approval of the settlement agreement or in response to any objections to the application for attorneys' fees shall be filed at least seven days prior to the fairness hearing.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer