Fulcer v. Saul, 18-cv-1881-pp. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20190723892
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 20), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On July 19, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. No. 20. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that: The Commissioner of Social Security's denial of benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Com
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 20), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) PAMELA PEPPER , District Judge . On July 19, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). Dkt. No. 20. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that: The Commissioner of Social Security's denial of benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Comm..
More
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION FOR REMAND (DKT. NO. 20), AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. §405(g)
PAMELA PEPPER, District Judge.
On July 19, 2019, the parties filed a stipulation for remand for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g). Dkt. No. 20. The court APPROVES the stipulation for remand, and ORDERS that:
The Commissioner of Social Security's denial of benefits is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner. On judicial remand, an ALJ will hold a new administrative hearing. The ALJ will proceed through the sequential disability evaluation process as appropriate, reconsider the residual functional capacity finding, and issue a new decision. In particular, the ALJ will weigh the medical and psychological opinions, including the opinion of Dr. Farrar, under the requirements of 20 C.F.R. §404.1527. The ALJ will explain the basis for the specific limitations included in the residual functional capacity assessment, as required by SSR 96-8p. The ALJ will discuss the claimant's subjective allegations per the requirements of SSR 16-3p. If warranted, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony.
Source: Leagle
