Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Brandies, 19-CR-163-JPS. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin Number: infdco20191231d64 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER J.P. STADTMUELLER , District Judge . On November 22, 2019, the parties filed a plea agreement, indicating that Defendant had agreed to plead guilty to Count One of the Indictment. (Docket #10). The parties appeared before Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin on December 11, 2019 to conduct a plea colloquy pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. (Docket #11). Defendant entered a plea of guilty as to Count One of the Indictment. Id. After cautioning and examining Defendant un
More

ORDER

On November 22, 2019, the parties filed a plea agreement, indicating that Defendant had agreed to plead guilty to Count One of the Indictment. (Docket #10). The parties appeared before Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin on December 11, 2019 to conduct a plea colloquy pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11. (Docket #11). Defendant entered a plea of guilty as to Count One of the Indictment. Id. After cautioning and examining Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, Magistrate Judge Duffin determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offense charged was supported by an independent factual basis containing each of the essential elements of the offense. (Docket #11 and #12).

Thereafter, Magistrate Judge Duffin filed a Report and Recommendation with this Court, recommending that: (1) the defendant's plea of guilty be accepted; (2) a presentence investigation report be prepared; and (3) the defendant be adjudicated guilty and have a sentence imposed accordingly. (Docket #12). Pursuant to General L. R. 72(c) (E.D. Wis.), 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 59(b) or 72(b) if applicable, the parties were advised that written objections to that recommendation, or any part thereof, could be filed within fourteen days of the date of service of the recommendation.

To date, no party has filed such an objection.

The Court has considered Magistrate Judge Duffin's recommendation and, having received no objection thereto, will adopt it.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge William E. Duffin's report and recommendation (Docket #12) be and the same is hereby ADOPTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer