Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Bagwell, 1:16CR41-01. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. West Virginia Number: infdco20161027h39 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE (DKT. NO. 61), ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING IRENE M. KEELEY , District Judge . On October 11, 2016, the defendant, William Bagwell ("Bagwell"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count One of the Indictment. After Bagwell stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE (DKT. NO. 61), ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING

On October 11, 2016, the defendant, William Bagwell ("Bagwell"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count One of the Indictment. After Bagwell stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States District Judge, he consented to tendering his plea before the magistrate judge. Previously, this Court had referred the guilty plea to the magistrate judge for the purposes of administering the allocution pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.

Based upon Bagwell's statements during the plea hearing and the testimony of Shawn Sweeney, Special Agent with the United States Food and Drug Administration, the magistrate judge found that Bagwell was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. On October 11, 2016, the magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") (dkt. no. 61) finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Bagwell's plea of guilty to Count One of the Indictment.

The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. The parties did not file any objections to the R&R.

Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R, ACCEPTS Bagwell's guilty plea, and ADJUGES him GUILTY of the crime charged in Count One of the Indictment.

Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence report prepared in this matter.

Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Bagwell, and prepare a presentence report for the Court;

2. The Government and Bagwell are to provide their versions of the offense to the probation officer by November 2, 2016;

3. The presentence report is to be disclosed to Bagwell, defense counsel, and the United States on or before January 6, 2017; however, the Probation Officer is not to disclose the sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);

4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence report on or before January 20, 2017;

5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence report with addendum to the Court on or before January 27, 2017; and

6. Counsel may file any written sentencing statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis from the statements or motions, on or before January 27, 2017.

The magistrate judge continued Bagwell on bond pursuant to the Order Setting Conditions of Release (dkt. no. 6).

The Court will conduct the sentencing hearing for the defendant on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 at 12:15 P.M. at the Clarksburg, West Virginia point of holding court.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record, the defendant and all appropriate agencies.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer