THOMAS S. KLEEH, District Judge.
On February 12, 2020, the Defendant, Jack Carl Rice ("Rice"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of
Based upon Defendant Rice's statements during the plea hearing and the Government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Defendant Rice was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") [Dkt. No. 19] finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Defendant Rice's plea of guilty to Count One of the Information.
The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. Neither the Defendant nor the Government filed objections to the R&R.
Accordingly, this Court
Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court
Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1
1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Rice, and prepare a presentence investigation report for the Court;
2. The Government and Defendant Rice shall each provide their narrative descriptions of the offense to the Probation Officer by
3. The presentence investigation report shall be disclosed to Defendant Rice, counsel for Defendant, and the Government on or before
4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence investigation report on or before
5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence investigation report with addendum to the Court on or before
6. Counsel may file any written sentencing memorandum or statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis for the same, on or before
The magistrate judge remanded Defendant to the custody of the U.S. Marshal Service to be returned to the custody of the State of West Virginia. The Government indicated that Defendant may be released from state custody in the near future and made an oral Motion to Detain. Defendant waived his right to hold a detention hearing while before the magistrate judge but reserved his right to hold a detention hearing should he be released from state custody.
The Court will conduct the
It is so
The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies.