COOK v. ASTRUE, 2:11-0485. (2012)
Court: District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Number: infdco20120626h01
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN T. COPENHAVER, Jr., District Judge. The court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (PF&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley, entered on May 2, 2012. The magistrate judge recommends that the court reverse the Commissioner's final decision and remand the claim pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C.A. 405(g) for the purpose of awarding benefits. Inasmuch as neither party has objected to the PF&R, and following a de novo
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JOHN T. COPENHAVER, Jr., District Judge. The court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (PF&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley, entered on May 2, 2012. The magistrate judge recommends that the court reverse the Commissioner's final decision and remand the claim pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C.A. 405(g) for the purpose of awarding benefits. Inasmuch as neither party has objected to the PF&R, and following a de novo ..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN T. COPENHAVER, Jr., District Judge.
The court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (PF&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley, entered on May 2, 2012.
The magistrate judge recommends that the court reverse the Commissioner's final decision and remand the claim pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) for the purpose of awarding benefits.
Inasmuch as neither party has objected to the PF&R, and following a de novo review, the court concludes the recommended disposition is correct. It is, accordingly, ORDERED as follows:
1. That the PF&R be, and it hereby is, adopted by the court and incorporated herein;
2. That decision of the Commissioner be, and it hereby is, reversed and this claim is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) for the purpose of awarding benefits.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and the magistrate judge.
Source: Leagle
