Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McKinzie v. U.S., 2:16-cv-06219 (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. West Virginia Number: infdco20180425g38 Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2018
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH R. GOODWIN , District Judge . This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636. On March 16, 2018, Judge Eifert submitted her Proposed Findings & Recommendations [ECF No. 190] ("PF&R") and recommended that the court DENY the petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [ECF
More

ORDER

This action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 16, 2018, Judge Eifert submitted her Proposed Findings & Recommendations [ECF No. 190] ("PF&R") and recommended that the court DENY the petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody [ECF No. 175] and DISMISS the case with prejudice. Neither party timely filed objections to the PF&R nor sought an extension of time.

A district court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). This court is not, however, required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985).

Because the parties have not filed objections in this case, the court accepts and incorporates herein the PF&R and orders judgment consistent therewith. The court DENIES the petitioner's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody, [ECF No. 175], DISMISSES the case with prejudice, and DIRECTS that this action be removed from the docket.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer