Harris v. McKesson Corporation, 2:19-00707. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Number: infdco20191223g10
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID A. FABER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint filed by certain defendants in this matter, the "Walgreens defendants". (ECF No. 54). In support of their motion to extend time, defendants inform the court that this matter was included on Conditional Transfer Order No. 115 which would transfer the case to the multidistrict litigation, MDL 2804, currently pending in the Northern Dist
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DAVID A. FABER , Senior District Judge . Pending before the court is a motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint filed by certain defendants in this matter, the "Walgreens defendants". (ECF No. 54). In support of their motion to extend time, defendants inform the court that this matter was included on Conditional Transfer Order No. 115 which would transfer the case to the multidistrict litigation, MDL 2804, currently pending in the Northern Distr..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DAVID A. FABER, Senior District Judge.
Pending before the court is a motion to extend time to respond to plaintiff's complaint filed by certain defendants in this matter, the "Walgreens defendants". (ECF No. 54). In support of their motion to extend time, defendants inform the court that this matter was included on Conditional Transfer Order No. 115 which would transfer the case to the multidistrict litigation, MDL 2804, currently pending in the Northern District of Ohio. Plaintiff opposed the transfer of this action and has filed a motion to vacate the conditional transfer order which remains pending before the JPML. Defendants seek an extension of sixty (60) days following a decision by the JPML granting a motion to vacate a conditional transfer order covering this action or otherwise finally denying transfer of this action. Plaintiff opposes an extension of that duration.
For good cause shown, the motion for an extension of time to respond to the complaint is GRANTED. The moving defendants will be required to respond to the complaint within sixty (60) days following a decision by the JPML granting a motion to vacate the conditional transfer order covering this action or otherwise finally denying transfer of this action.
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
