Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs JADE GIBSON WALTZ, 08-003725PL (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Jul. 29, 2008 Number: 08-003725PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 1
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs HENRY THOMAS LANE, JR., 00-000327 (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Gainesville, Florida Jan. 20, 2000 Number: 00-000327 Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 2
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs ARNOLD RABINOWITZ, 03-001625PL (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:West Palm Beach, Florida May 02, 2003 Number: 03-001625PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 3
PATRICIA A. WOTRING vs. DIV OF STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE, 83-002939 (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Number: 83-002939 Latest Update: May 05, 1991

Findings Of Fact Petitioner, Patricia A. Wotring, is an employee of the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services. At all times relevant hereto she was enrolled as a member of the State of Florida Employees Group Health Self Insurance Plan (Plan). The State of Florida is a self-insurer. It has contracted with Blue Cross - Blue Shield to act as its administrator in processing and paying all claims by employees under the Plan. Claims are suppose to be paid-in accordance with coverage requirements, limitations and exclusions that have been adopted by the State. These requirements are set forth in the Employees Group Health Self Insurance Booklet (Booklet) which has been received in evidence as respondent's exhibit 1. Between November, 1982 and January, 1983 petitioner submitted five claims for benefits with Blue Cross - Blue Shield. The claims totaled $633, of which $620 were for mental health services provided by a Tallahassee clinical psychologist and $13 for laboratory services performed by a Tallahassee physician. Although Blue Cross - Blue Shield had been "instructed" to not pay this type of claim, the claims were nonetheless honored in early 1983 and Wotring received checks at that time for $633. Upon advice from respondent, Department of Administration, Blue Cross - Blue Shield requested reimbursement from petitioner in June, 1983 for $633. That request prompted the instant proceeding. As a basis for claiming reimbursement, Blue Cross - Blue Shield relied upon Section H of the Exclusions portion of the Booklet. That section reads as follows: No payment shall be made under the Plan for the following: H. Services, care, treatment, and supplies furnished by a person who ordinarily resides in the Insured's home or by any person or institution not otherwise defined in the Definitions section of this booklet. (Emphasis Added) It then referred to page 39 of the Booklet which defines a "physician" as follows: "Physician" shall mean the following: a doctor of medicine (M.D.), doctor of osteopathy (D.O.), doctor of surgical chiropody (D.S.C.) or doctor of podiatric medicine (D.P.M.), who is legally qualified and licensed to practice medicine and perform surgery at the time and place the service is rendered; a licensed chiropractor acting within the scope of his/her license, provided the insured receiving his/her services is covered under the chiropractic coverage option of the Plan and the proper premium has been paid; a licensed dentist who performs specific surgical procedures covered by the Plan, or who renders services due to injuries resulting from Accidents, provided such procedures or services are within the scope of the dentist's professional license; a licensed optometrist who performs procedures covered by the Plan provided such procedures are within the scope of the optometrist's professional license. A clinical psychologist is not defined within the Definitions section of the Plan. Because a clinical psychologist does not fall within the definition of a physician, and is not otherwise defined within that section, the services received by Wotring were properly excluded from coverage by the Plan. Effective October 1, 1983, the Legislature amended the law to require that services rendered by a clinical psychologist be covered by the Plan. In the event payments are made in error, the Department's policy is to instruct its Administrator (Blue Cross - Blue Shield) to request reimbursement from the insured. Petitioner acknowledged that the five claims were paid in error. However, she contended that the claims were submitted in good faith over a period of time and were honored. Accordingly, she argues it is wrong to now require her to repay those amounts.

Recommendation Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, it is RECOMMENDED that petitioner repay respondent $613 for payments previously received in error that are not covered by the Plan. It is further RECOMMENDED that in view of the size of the amount owed, petitioner be allowed to repay that amount on an installment basis over a six-month period, if she so chooses. It is further RECOMMENDED that she not be required to repay $20 to respondent if all deductibles for the appropriate calendar year have been met. DONE and ENTERED this 18th day of November, 1983, in Tallahassee, Florida. DONALD R. ALEXANDER Hearing Officer Division of Administrative Hearings The Oakland Building 2009 Apalachee Parkway Tallahassee, Florida 32301 (904) 488-9675 Filed with the Clerk of the Division of Administrative Hearings this 18th day of November, 1983. COPIES FURNISHED: Patricia A. Wotring 1833 Mayfair Road Tallahassee, Florida 32303 Daniel C. Brown, Esquire 435 Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Nevin G. Smith, Secretary Department of Administration Room 435, Carlton Building Tallahassee, Florida 32301

Florida Laws (2) 110.123120.57
# 4
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs JOSE M. SOLER, 09-000932PL (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Miami, Florida Feb. 18, 2009 Number: 09-000932PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 5
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs SHANTI J. PENA, 09-005852PL (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Orlando, Florida Oct. 22, 2009 Number: 09-005852PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 6
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs ANN MARIE BESSIRE, 06-000424PL (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Orlando, Florida Feb. 02, 2006 Number: 06-000424PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 7
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs HAROLD GENE JARRELL, 03-000379PL (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tallahassee, Florida Feb. 03, 2003 Number: 03-000379PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 8
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs CRAIG JOSEPH GOODIE, 03-003237 (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Naples, Florida Sep. 05, 2003 Number: 03-003237 Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 9
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs PAMELA YVONNE LITTLE, 00-003237PL (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Lakeland, Florida Aug. 04, 2000 Number: 00-003237PL Latest Update: Oct. 06, 2024
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer