Findings Of Fact Robert Charles Crump was born on August 15, 2009, at Baptist South Hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida. Charlie weighed 2,505 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Charlie, to determine whether an injury occurred to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. In a medical report dated September 17, 2014, Dr. Willis described his findings in part as follows: In summary, the mother presented at 34 weeks with premature rupture of the membranes in early labor. Variable HFR [sic] decelerations developed during the last two hours prior to delivery. Cesarean section was done for the non-reassuring FHR pattern. The newborn was depressed. The newborn hospital course was complicated by respiratory depression, hypotension and one episode of apnea. Although the baby was discharged home with a normal exam, MRI at 16 months of age was done for evaluation of a weak left hand and found a prior cerebral stroke. It is likely the baby suffered some degree of oxygen deprivation during labor, delivery and/or in the immediate post resuscitation period. However, it is less clear that any oxygen deprivation during this time period resulted in brain injury. No head imaging studies were done during the newborn hospital course. The child did suffer a stroke, which was documented at 16 months of age by MRI. There was an apparent obstetrical event that likely resulted in some degree of oxygen loss to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery and continued into the immediate post delivery period. Without imaging studies during the newborn hospital course, I am unable to determine if this oxygen deprivation resulted in the child’s brain injury (stroke). Pediatric Neurology evaluation would be helpful in this determination. Dr. Willis reaffirmed his opinion in an affidavit dated March 8, 2016. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Charlie and to review his medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Charlie on November 5, 2014. In a medical report dated November 5, 2014, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: In summary, Charlie’s general physical and neurological examinations reveal a mild left hemiparesis, notable mainly for asymmetry of movement. His muscle tone is well-preserved and he has full range of movement bilaterally with the exception of full left supination. Charlie is functioning cognitively at age level. He has done remarkably well in his therapies. I reviewed the medical records sent on October 14, 2014. They document Charlie’s birth at 34 weeks gestation at Baptist Medical Center South in Jacksonville following premature rupture of membranes productive of blood-tinged amniotic fluid. Charlie was born by emergent Caesarian section for arrest of descent and presented limp, apneic and cyanotic. Apgar scores were 2 and 7 at 1 and 5 minutes. He was resuscitated via bag and mask and breathed spontaneously at just over 2 minutes. His NICU stay was complicated by apnea and bradycardia which resolved fully and transient respiratory depression. Charlie was never intubated or mechanically ventilated and was maintained on room air from August 17th until discharge on August 24th. No neonatal brain imaging was performed. MRI scan of the brain on February 8, 2011 revealed an old ischemic infarct involving the anterior limb of the right internal capsule. The remainder of the brain was normal. A consideration of the findings from today’s evaluation and record review lead me to recommend that Charlie not be considered for compensation within the NICA program. He has normal mental functioning and a mild motor deficit. Furthermore, his stroke was likely acquired prenatally, and there is no evidence of either mechanical injury or oxygen deprivation in the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reaffirmed his opinions in an affidavit dated February 24, 2016. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event that likely resulted in some degree of oxygen loss to the baby's brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that Charlie has normal mental functioning and a mild motor deficit, and that his stroke was likely acquired prenatally. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion is credited.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Morgan Wilson, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary findings Petitioners, Tracie Wilson and James Ray Wilson, are the natural parents and guardians of Morgan Wilson. Morgan was born a live infant on December 12, 2000, at Baptist Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and her birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Morgan's birth was Martin Garcia, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Morgan's birth At or about 7:29 a.m., December 12, 2000, Mrs. Wilson (with an estimated date of delivery of December 23, 2000, and the fetus at 38 3/7 weeks gestation) presented to Baptist Medical Center, in labor. At the time, Mrs. Wilson's membranes were noted as intact, and mild to moderate uterine contractions were noted at a frequency of 2-4 minutes. Fetal monitoring revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate, with a baseline of 150-160 beats per minute, and the presence of fetal movement. At 9:45 a.m., Mrs. Wilson's membranes were artificially ruptured, with meconium stained amniotic fluid noted. At the time, vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 4 centimeters, effacement complete, and the fetus at 0 station. Mrs. Wilson's labor progressed, and at 7:29 p.m., Morgan was delivered, with vacuum assistance. According to the Admission Summary, Morgan was suctioned on the perineum, and, before she could be moved to the warmer, the "[c]ord clamp loosened with small amount of blood loss prior to reclamping." The Admission Summary further reveals that Morgan was "floppy and required bag mask ventilation x3 minutes, then blowby oxygen for 3 minutes." Apgar scores were noted as 1 and 8, at one and five minutes,2 and umbilical cord pH was reported as normal (7.28). Morgan was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for "eval[uation] after blood loss." There, her blood count (with a hematocrit of 46 percent) was reported as normal or, stated otherwise, without evidence of a clinically significant blood loss due to the loosening of the clamp. Following two hours of observation, Morgan was transferred to the normal newborn nursery; however, at 4:20 p.m., December 13, 2000, she was readmitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. The reason for admission was stated in the Admission Summary, as follows: . . . Indications for transfer included 38 week WF with renal vein thrombosis and left middle cerebral artery stroke. Neonatology consulted midafternoon today secondary to hematuria. On exam, Dr. Cuevas noted asymmetry of pupils, with right more dilated and less responsive then left. Also noted to have torticollis, preferring to keep head turned to left. Also noted to have palpable mass in left abdomen. Renal ultrasound revealed renal vein thrombosis. HUS showed some echogenecity so Head CT done revealing left middle cerebral artery stroke. Hct this am 41. Baby then admitted to NICU for further care. Neurology and hematology consulted as well as nephrology. Impressions on admission included: possible coaguloathy; left middle cerebral artery stroke; renal vein thrombosis; and torticollis. Morgan remained at Baptist Medical Center until December 29, 2000, when she was discharged to her parents' care. Morgan's Discharge Summary noted the following active diagnoses: possible coagulopathy; anemia; left middle cerebral artery stroke; renal vein thrombosis; and torticollis. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Here, indisputably, the record demonstrates that Morgan suffered an injury to the brain (following a stroke in the territory of the left middle cerebral artery, likely due to arterial occlusion or superior saggital sinus thrombosis). What is disputed, is whether the proof demonstrates, more likely than not, that such injury occurred "in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation," and whether any such injury rendered Morgan "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." The timing of, and the neurologic consequences that followed, Morgan's brain injury To address whether Morgan's brain injury occurred "in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation," and whether such injury rendered Morgan "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired," Petitioners offered medical records relating to Mrs. Wilson's antepartum course, as well as those associated with Morgan's birth and subsequent development. Additionally, Mrs. Wilson testified on her own behalf, and Respondent offered the deposition testimony of Dr. Donald Willis, a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, and Dr. Michael Duchowny, a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, electroencephalography, and neurophysiology.3 As for the timing of Morgan's injury, it was Dr. Willis' opinion that the medical records did not reveal any obstetrical event that would account for Morgan's injury. In so concluding, Dr. Willis noted that fetal monitoring (which began on admission and continued until 7:28 p.m., one minute prior to delivery) did not reveal evidence of fetal compromise or a clinically significant event that would account for Morgan's injury, that Morgan's 5-minute Apgar score was normal, her umbilical cord pH was normal, and her hematocrit on initial admission to the neonatal intensive care unit was normal. Consequently, Dr. Willis concluded that Morgan's injury did not occur during labor, delivery, or resuscitation. Also speaking to the timing of Morgan's injury was Dr. Duchowny who, based on his review of the medical records, shared Dr. Willis' opinion that there was no evident problem during labor and delivery, and further opined that Morgan's injury likely occurred prior to labor. In concluding that Morgan's injury likely predated the onset of labor, Dr. Duchowny noted that Morgan's CT scan on the day after birth clearly revealed a stroke in the territory of the left middle cerebral artery, and that it would take at least 72 hours for a stroke to be revealed so clearly on a CT scan. Apart from the timing of Morgan's brain injury, Dr. Duchowny also expressed his opinions, based on his examination of November 6, 2001, regarding the neurologic consequences that followed Morgan's injury. Dr. Duchowny reported the results of Morgan's neurology evaluation, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, well developed and well nourished 10 1/2 month old white female. The skin is warm and moist. There are no cutaneous stigmata or dysmorphic features. The hair is light blonde, fine and of normal texture. Morgan weighs 18-pounds, 10-ounces. Her head circumference measures 45.6 cm, which is at the 60th percentile for age matched controls. There are no dysraphic features. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION reveals an alert infant who is socially oriented. She has good central gaze fixation, conjugate following and normal ocular fundi. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. There is blink to threat from both directions. There are no facial asymmetries. The tongue and palate move well, and there is no drooling. Motor examination reveals an obvious asymmetry of posturing and movement. The left side is positioned normally and tends to grasp for objects. The right upper and lower extremity have diminished movement in comparison to the left and there is a tendency for the left hand to cross the midline for all manual tasks. She will not grasp for an offered cube with her right hand. In contrast, the left hand will grasp for a cube and display the beginnings of individual finger movements. The thumb on the right hand is fisted. The muscle, bulk and tone appears symmetric. Deep tendon reflexes are 2+ at the biceps and knees. Both plantare responses are mildly extensor. On pull-to-sit there is an asymmetry of the upper extremity, with relatively greater pull on the left side. The neck tone is good. There are no adventitious movements. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to touch. The neurovascular examination via the anterior fontanelle is unremarkable. In SUMMARY, Morgan's neurologic examination reveals a mild to moderate motor asymmetry of the right side affecting primarily upper extremity, but with some lower extremity involvement as well. In contrast, Morgan's cognitive status appeared well preserved for age and she is certainly developing on schedule with regard to her linguistic milestones. I suspect that Morgan's motor function will continue to improve, as she is working actively in therapy. In sum, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Morgan evidenced neither a permanent and substantial physical impairment nor a permanent and substantial mental impairment. In contrast to the proof offered by Respondent, Petitioners offered the lay testimony of Mrs. Wilson, which was legally insufficient to support a finding regarding the timing of Morgan's brain injury, and which failed to support a conclusion that Morgan was permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. See, e.g., Vero Beach Care Center v. Ricks, 476 So. 2d 262, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)("[L]ay testimony is legally insufficient to support a finding of causation where the medical condition involved is not readily observable.") Consequently, since the opinions of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny are logical, and consistent with the medical records, it must be resolved that, more likely than not, Morgan's brain injury did not occur "in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation," and that Morgan's injury did not render her "permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.")
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether the infant, gacob Tomlian, has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings 1. Jacob Tomlian (Jacob) is the natural son of Dora Lee and Kevin James Tomlian. He was born a live infant on May 11, 1991, at Humana Hospital-Bennett n/k/a Westside Regional Medical Center, a hospital located in Broward County, Florida, and his birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams. 2. The physician providing obstetrical services during the birth of Jacob was Mark S. Grenitz, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a “participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan), as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. The birth of Jacob Tomlian 3. At or about 6:28 a.m., May 11, 1991, Dora Lee Tomlian was admitted to Humana Hospital-Bennett for induction of labor. At the time, Jacob was post-term, with a gestational age of approximately 42 weeks and Mrs. Tomlian’s obstetrician, Mark S. Grenitz, M.D., proposed, the cervix being favorable, to attempt a vaginal birth after a cesarean section (a "VBAC"). 4. Upon admission, a vaginal exam revealed dilation of the cervix at 1-2 centimeters, effacement at 50 percent, and the fetus at station -3. Fetal monitoring was commenced at 7:30 a.m. and continued throughout labor until 4:16 p.m., shortly before Mrs. Tomlian was taken to an operating room for a cesarean section, discussed infra.? During the entire time, as evidenced by the fetal monitor strips, the fetal heart tone was completely normal, with no evidence of fetal compromise or oxygen deprivation. 5. At 7:50 a.m., a second vaginal exam revealed dilation of the cervix at 2 centimeters, effacement at 80 percent and the fetus at station -2. Dr. Grenitz performed an amniotomy (an artificial rupture of the fetal membrane) to induce labor, and a large amount of clear amniotic fluid was observed. Labor ensued, and Mrs. Tomlian slowly progressed through labor until her cervix was dilated to 3 centimeters. Thereafter, labor failed to progress and Dr. Grenitz, diagnosing an arrest in the active phase of labor, proposed to proceed with a cesarean section. 6. At or about 4:20 p.m., Mrs. Tomlian was taken to the operating room, and at 4:44 p.m., Jacob was delivered by cesarean section. During delivery two loops of the nuchal cord were observed around Jacob’s neck, but upon delivery he exhibited a cry and no meconium was present. Jacob's Apgar scores were 7 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. 7. The Apgar scores assigned Jacob are a numerical expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart. rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex irritability, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through a maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute Jacob’s Apgar score totaled 7, with heart rate, respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, muscle tone being graded at 1, and color being graded at 0. At five minutes, Jacob's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort and reflex irritability being graded at 2 each, and muscle tone and color being graded at 1 each. Such scores would be characterized by an obstetrician as "normal", and are inconsistent with those that would normally be expected of an infant who developed fetal compromise or hypoxic insult during labor or delivery.? 8. Following delivery, Jacob was administered oxygen by mask for about one minute. Physical examination was essentially normal, with the exception that Jacob was noted to have a large head for his age, equinovarus positioning of both feet and diminished tone (hypotonia/limpness). Consequently, Jacob was admitted to the newborn nursery with the recommendation that he undergo an orthopedic consultation. 9. On May 12, 1991, Jacob had an orthopedic consultation. Upon examination, the physician M.A., Hajianpout, M.D., observed that "[b]loth feet seem to easily go to neutral rotation", diagnosed a mild positional deformity of both feet, concluded that Jacob "will correct without any problem", and proposed a follow-up consult following his discharge. 10. On May 13, 1991, a cranial ultrasound was performed to address the observation that Jacob had a large head for his age at birth. That examination concluded: Through an anterior fontanelle approach, coronal and sagittal views of the neonatal brain were obtained showing the ventricles to be normal in size and configuration. There is no evidence of an intracranial hemorrhage. The echotexture of the brain parenchyma is normal. No masses or deviation of the midline structures was seen. IMPRESSION: NORMAL NEONATAL CRANIAL ULTRASOUND. 11. The remainder of Jacob’s neonatal course was uneventful, and on May 15, 1991, he and his mother were discharged from the hospital. Subsequent. developments 12. Following discharge, Jacob continued to be followed orthopaedically by Dr. Hajianpour. According to his records, Dr. Hajianpour treated Jacob from May 28, 1991 through October 1992. 13. The records basically reveal that Dr. Hajianpour initially diagnosed Jacob with a mild positional deformity and started Jacob with "straight last shoes" with a monthly follow- up. In July 1991, Dr. Hajianpour again diagnosed a mild deformity of both feet, but also observed metatarsus adductus with internal torsion of tibia bilaterally. Accordingly, he switched Jacob to a "Miami brace" to correct the internal tibial torsion. The "Miami brace" was continued through January 1992, at which time it appeared to Dr. Hajianpour that the feet were normal and the internal tibial torsion had resolved. Accordingly, Dr. Hajianpour rejected further use of the "Miami brace", proposed that Jacob use high top sneakers, and that he return in 3 months for a follow-up visit. 14. Dr. Hajianpour continued to follow Jacob for developmental stages (i.e., every 3 months) and Jacob demonstrated a fairly normal developmental pattern until his last evaluation in October 1992. At that time, Dr. Hajianpour noted the return of some tibial torsion. Specifically, the examination revealed: EXAMINATION: Today he comes in. He has started standing and taking a few steps. However, both feet can go to neutral position and even to about 30 degrees of external rotation. He sits with his knees internally rotated. I discussed with the mother that this should not be allowed; and he should sit like an Indian. As far as the feet are concerned, both of them look good. The foot- thigh angle seems to be within normal limits. There is some degree of tibial torsion. However, I think I can still wait for a few more months and see how he does. PLAN: If he continues having a problem, then we will put him in a Miami brace. 15. On January 14, 1993, Jacob’s parents took him to Michael A. Tidwell, M.D., for a second opinion regarding his bilateral foot deformity. After taking a history from the parents, reviewing Dr. Hajianpour’s records, and examining Jacob, Dr. Tidwell concluded: IMPRESSION: 1. Mild postural deformity of both feet. RECOMMENDATIONS : It would appear that the feet have responded well to the treatment Dr. Hajianpour initiated. The current state of development there seems to be some residual postural problems, but nothing that would need be treated. I anticipate the child will continue to walk totally normally and develop at his own rate. At the present time, I do not see any need for orthopedic intervention. 16. On February 2, 1993, following a referral from Jacob's pediatrician, Ivan Fandel, M.p.,4 Jacob was examined by Stuart B. Brown, M.D., a pediatric neurologist. Dr. Brown's report of that examination, dated February 4, 1993, concluded that Jacob "has a spastic diplegia of the lower extremities and is delayed in his speech and language production from an expressive standpoint. His gait is awkward and dynamically spastic."° Dr. Brown did not, however, identify the cause of Jacob’s condition. 17. Finally, Jacob was examined by Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, on May 17, 1994. Dr. Duchowny concluded that: In summary, Jacob’s neurologic examination reveals evidence of marked motor delay for both axial and appendicular musculature. He demonstrates generalized hypotonia with hyperreflexia and pyramidal signs suggesting that the motor findings are on a central basis. There is also an element of ataxia. Jacob has oromotor problems and an obvious and marked speech delay. I regard Jacob’s neurologic problems to involve both motor and mental status. I believe that they are both quite substantial and in all likelihood are permanent. The postures of the lower extremities are likely to reflect deformity rather than spasticity. Dr. Duchowny, like Dr. Brown, did not address the cause of Jacob’s condition. 18. Based on the proof, the record supports the conclusion that Jacob suffers from a condition that has rendered him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. What remains to be resolved is the genesis of that condition or , more pertinent to these proceedings, whether the proof supports the conclusion that such condition was caused by "oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital," as required by Section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes. The cause of Jacob's condition 19. As to whether Jacob’s condition was caused by "oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital," petitioners offered the deposition testimony of Larry Schneck, M.D., a pediatric neurologist. It was Dr. Schneck’s opinion that Jacob suffered a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment as a consequence of an injury to the brain caused by oxygen deprivation during the course of labor and delivery. Such opinion was, however, rendered as an ultimate conclusion, and no information or insight as to the basis of his conclusions was offered.°® 20. Compared with the opinion of Dr. Schneck, respondent offered the testimony of Charles Kalstone, M.D., an obstetrician and gynecologist.’ It was Dr. Kalstone’s opinion that Jacob did not suffer any oxygen deprivation during the course of labor and delivery and, consequently, he did not suffer any injury through those mechanisms which could account for his current condition. ® 21. As the predicate for his opinion, Dr. Kalstone observed that the fetal heart monitoring was completely normal, with no evidence to suggest there was any fetal compromise or oxygen deprivation; that the infant was delivered by cesarean section, which is associated with less trauma than natural child birth; that upon delivery Jacob’s Apgars were normal and there was no meconium present; and, that Jacob's neonatal course was otherwise atypical for birth trauma or hypoxia because there were no neonatal seizures or evidence of acidosis or renal failure. 22. Here, I accept the testimony and opinions of Dr. Kalstone as being the more credible and substantial as to whether Jacob’s condition can reasonably be attributed to oxygen deprivation during the course of labor or delivery. Indeed, given the relatively uneventful labor and delivery, as well as Jacob’s postnatal presentation, Dr. Kalstone’s opinions are most consistent with the proof in this case.
Conclusions SSSRARANCES For Petitioner: Scott Mm, Newmark, Esq. 1212 Southeast Third Avenue Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 For Respondent; W. Douglas Moody, ur., Esq. Bateman Graham 300 Fast Park Avenue Tallahassee, Florida 32301 For Intervenor: Todd S. Payne, Esq. Tripp, Scott, Conklin & smith Post Office Box 14245 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33302
Other Judicial Opinions A party who is adversely affected by this final order is entitled to judicial review pursuant to Sections 120.68 and 766.311, Florida Statutes. Review proceedings are governed by the Florida Rules Of Appellate Procedure. Such proceedings are commenced by filing one copy of a notice of appeal with the Agency Clerk Of The Division Of Administrative Hearings and a_ second copy, accompanied by filing fees prescribed by law, with the appropriate District Court Of Appeal. See, Section 120.68(2), Florida Statutes, and Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association v. Carreras, 598 So.2d 299 (Fla. ist DCA 1992). The notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the order to be reviewed. 18
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Emmanuel Hooks, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Petitioner, Brianna Denise Davidson, is the mother and natural guardian of Emmanuel Hooks, a minor. Emmanuel was born a live infant on July 26, 1999, at Gulf Coast Medical Center, a hospital located in Panama City, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Emmanuel's birth was Steven G. Smith, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Emmanuel's birth At or about 9:10 p.m., July 25, 1999, Ms. Davidson (with an estimated date of delivery of July 26, 1999, and the fetus at 40 weeks gestation) presented to Gulf Coast Medical Center in labor. Initial vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 2-3 centimeters dilation, effacement as "thin," and the fetus at station -3. External fetal monitoring revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate (of 140-150 beats per minute), with accelerations. Ms. Davidson was continually monitored, and at 11:00 p.m., she was admitted to labor and delivery. At the time, uterine contractions were noted at 3-5 minute intervals, and vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 3 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -3. Ms. Davidson's labor apparently did not progress, and at 2:49 a.m., July 26, 1999, she was started on Pitocin. Thereafter, Ms. Davidson's labor progressed slowly, and at 6:45 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 5 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, external fetal monitoring continued to reveal a reassuring fetal heart rate. Ms. Davidson's labor continued to slowly progress, and by 9:00 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, at 8:48 a.m., Ms. Davidson's membranes spontaneously ruptured, with clear fluid noted. Thereafter, variable decelerations were noted with each contraction, consistent with umbilical cord compression, and fetal heart base line remained reassuring (in the 140-beat minute range). From 9:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson's labor failed to progress (with the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1), and at 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson was transported to the operating room for delivery by caesarean section. Notably, between 9:00 a.m., and 11:45 a.m., while variable decelerations continued, the fetal heart rate base line remained in the 140-beat per minute range, and fetal electrode revealed the presence of short term variability. According to the records, Ms. Davidson was in the operating room at 11:45 a.m., anesthesia started at 11:45 a.m., surgery started at 12:32 p.m., and Emmanuel was delivered at 12:35 p.m. Of note, the "nucal cord x 1" observed during delivery was described as "loose," and fetal heart monitoring in the operating room and immediately prior to the caesarean section revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate. On delivery, Emmanuel was bulb-suctioned, but did not require resuscitation. Initial newborn assessment noted no apparent abnormalities, and Apgar scores were recorded as 8 at one minute and 9 at 5 minutes. The Apgar scores assigned to Emmanuel are a numeric expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex response, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflect response being graded at 2 each, and color being graded a 0. At five minutes, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 9, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex response again graded at 2 each, and color now graded at 1. Such scores are considered normal, and inconsistent with recent hypoxic insult or trauma. Following the initial newborn assessment, Emmanuel was transported to the regular nursery, where he remained until he was discharged with his mother on July 29, 1999. Notably, the newborn nursery admission assessment was grossly normal, and there is no evidence of any complication during Emmanuel's stay. Emmanuel's subsequent development On December 10, 2001, following the filing of the subject claim, Emmanuel was examined by Dr. Michael Duchowny, a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, electroencephalography, and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny reported the results of his neurology evaluation, as well as the history he obtained from the parents, as follows: HISTORY ACCORDING TO MR. AND MRS. HOOKS: Emmanuel is a 2 1/2 year old boy who the parents indicated suffers from cerebral palsy and brain injury. They began by explaining that Emmanuel suffered brain injury at birth due to a cord being wrapped around his neck. He was delivered by emergency caesarean section. They noted that Emmanuel's MRI has shown periventricular leukomalacia and furnished a copy of the MRI report. Emmanuel's growth and developmental milestones have been slow. He did not rollover until 9 months, nor did he sit until a year of age. He stood at 14 months, walked at 18 months and said his first word at age 2. He now has a lexicon of only one word ("ma-ma"). Emmanuel is not toilet trained. He is described as being extremely active. He does not sit still at anytime during the day and it is difficult to examine him or provide therapy. He attends a wellness center where he receives physical, speech and occupational therapy on a twice weekly basis. Communication is a particular problem area for him. Emmanuel's appetite has also been diminished and he is now "only starting to eat". His mother indicated that Emmanuel suffers from "low muscle tone" and that he drools frequently. She also mentioned that he wakes up frequently at night and is just beginning to sleep more consistently. Emmanuel does not play with other children at school. His activity level and intrusiveness have precluded meaningful peer interactions. The parents are aware that his eye contact is poor. The parents stated that Emmanuel "had seizures", but then went on to explain that 2 EEG's were normal and he was never placed on medication. The events were described as "getting into a trance". He has not had motor convulsions. FAMILY HISTORY: Both parents are healthy. A 4 year brother had no medical problems and there are no family members with degenerative illnesses, mental retardation or cerebral palsy. Emmanuel was born at Gulf Coast Medical after a 39 week gestation. He weighed 8-pounds, 9- ounces at birth and breathed well. He was discharged from the nursery at 3 days of age. Emmanuel is fully immunized, has no significant drug allergies and never been hospitalized or undergone surgery. His vision and hearing are said to be excellent. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, but extremely active and well developed 2 1/2 year old toddler. Emmanuel weighs 39-pounds. His head circumference measures 50.2 cm and there are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. Emmanuel's neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. Emmanuel's NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION is difficult to complete, as he is constantly in motion. The physical examination requires restraint from his father, as he continually tries to touch things and pull items off the desktop and shelves. Emanuel has very poor eye contact and did not communicate in words at anytime during the session. It was difficult for him to follow commands as well, as his attention span constantly shifted. He drooled intermittently. The tongue movements are poorly coordinated. Cranial nerve examination reveals full visual fields to direct confrontation testing. There is blink to threat from either direction. I could not perform a fundoscopic examination. There are no facial asymmetries. Motor examination reveals mild generalized hypotonia with full range of motion. There are no adventitious movements, aside from the high activity level and no evidence of focal weakness or atrophy. Emmanuel's gait is stable, but slightly wide- based and he has generalized hypotonia. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ bilaterally and plantar responses are in flexion. There is withdrawal of all extremities to touch. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. Cerebellar testing could not be completed due to poor cooperation. In SUMMARY, Emmanuel's neurologic examination is significant for multiple areas of developmental delay. He is extremely overactive and inattentive, and has a significant behavior and communication problem. He additionally demonstrates poor eye contact and has a significant social disability. There are no specific focal or lateralizing findings to suggest a structural brain lesion. The findings on Emmanuel's neurologic examination suggests a diagnosis of a pervasive developmental disorder. Emmanuel fits within the autistic spectrum and this was communicated to the family . . . . The cause and timing of Emmanuel's neurological impairment To address the issue of whether Emmanuel's impairments were associated with an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital," as required for coverage under the Plan, Petitioner offered selected medical records relating to Ms. Davidson's antepartum course, as well as those associated with Emmanuel's birth and subsequent development. Additionally, Emmanuel's parents testified on their own behalf, and Respondent offered the deposition testimony of Dr. Duchowny, whose qualifications were previously noted, and the deposition testimony of Dr. Donald Willis, a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine. As for the cause and timing of Emmanuel's impairments, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on the results of his neurology evaluation and review of the medical records, that Emmanuel's impairments are not related to perinatal asphyxia or trauma. More particularly, Dr. Duchowny expressed his views, as follows: Q. Based on your review of the records and your evaluation of Emmanuel Hooks, can you give us an overview of his condition? A. Yes. I thought that Emmanuel's neurologic examination revealed evidence of developmental neurologic impairment. He was hyperactive and had an attention deficit disorder and additionally had significant behavior, social and communication problems. All of this suggested he had developmental problems in multiple areas, consistent with a diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder. Many of the children with pervasive developmental disorder go on to develop childhood autism as they get older. * * * Q. In this particular case, do you believe that Emmanuel's condition was acquired during the course of labor-delivery in the immediate post-delivery period? A. No, I do not. Q. What is the basis for that opinion? A. The basis for my opinion is that autism is a developmental disorder which results from unknown factors operating in utero prior to the onset of labor and delivery and is not a recognized complication of birth asphysia or birth trauma. Q. I take it your opinion is that Emmanuel Hooks did not acquire whatever neurological deficits he had as a result of any oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during labor-delivery or the immediate post- delivery period? A. That's correct. Q. In fact, was there any evidence in the medical records of any oxygen deprivation that occurred during the course of labor- delivery or resuscitation during the immediate post-delivery period? A. No. Q. Was there any evidence of mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor- delivery or the immediate post-delivery resuscitative period? A. No, there was not? Q. In your opinion, were Emmanuel's problems acquired prior to the course of labor- delivery? A. Yes. As for Dr. Willis, he was also of the opinion that the medical records revealed no evidence of oxygen deprivation or other trauma associated with Emmanuel's birth. The medical records, as well as the testimony of the physicians and the parents, have been carefully considered. So considered, it must be concluded that the proof failed to demonstrate that any impairment Emmanuel suffers was occasioned by an injury to the brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Jacob McGowan (Jacob) suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Jacob was born on July 2, 2015, at Shands at the University of Florida (Shands), Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida. The pregnancy, labor, and delivery of his mother, Christy Gonzalez, were managed by employees of UF Health Physicians and employees of Shands. At all times material, both the hospital and the physicians group were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Christy Gonzalez, age 32, presented to Shands on July 1, 2015. This was her second pregnancy. Ms. Gonzalez's prior pregnancy resulted in an emergency cesarean section at 37 weeks after a failed induction/arrest of labor due to gestational hypertension. Based on orders given by OBGYN Georgia Graham, M.D., Christy Gonzalez was admitted to the Labor and Delivery Suite at approximately 12:05 p.m. Ms. Gonzalez was started on Pitocin at 2:47 p.m. for induction/augmentation. Labor progressed slowly over the next approximate 30 hours during which time Ms. Gonzalez continued on Pitocin and exhibited several periods of ongoing and apparent uncontrolled maternal hypertension. Fetal heart monitoring started at 8:13 a.m. on July 1, 2015, and, as labor progressed, the fetal heart rate pattern demonstrated accelerations, and late and early/variable decelerations. The fetal heart rate reached 90 and below at numerous points throughout the day on July 1, 2015, including at 9:34 a.m., 9:54 a.m., 11:04 a.m., 11:10 a.m., 1:05-1:48 p.m. (multiple decelerations), 2:11-2:15 p.m., 2:16-2:18 p.m., 2:31 p.m., and 9:36-9:38 p.m. On July 2, 2015, the fetal heart rate continued to demonstrate accelerations and decelerations with "High FHR" noted at 8:56 p.m. (156/67), as well as 9:15 p.m. and 9:21 p.m. The fetal monitor strips indicate prolonged periods of fetal distress throughout this long period of labor. At approximately 11:00 p.m. on July 2, 2015, Ms. Gonzalez was taken into the operating room for emergency cesarean section due to decreased variability and repetitive decelerations in the fetal heart rate. Jacob was born a live infant at 11:42 p.m. on July 2, 2015. Jacob was a single gestation, weighing 4,366 grams at birth. Jacob was delivered by Dr. Anushka Chelliah, who was a NICA participating physician on July 2, 2015. Petitioner contends that Jacob suffered a birth-related neurological injury and seeks compensation under the NICA Plan. Respondent contends that Jacob has not suffered a birth-related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). Jacob was born via cesarean section secondary to failed induction and vaginal birth after cesarean section, and non- reassuring fetal heart rate tracing and nuchal cord. Jacob was delivered with no respiratory effort and a heart rate less than 60. Post-birth resuscitation included tactile stimulation, intubation, suctioning, and positive pressure ventilation. His Apgar scores were 1 at one minute, 3 at five minutes and 4 at 10 minutes. Physical examination at birth revealed he was pale, had poor tone and negative grasp, and poor moro and suck reflexes. Following color change and rise in his heart rate and increasing oxygen saturations, Jacob was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further management. Initial assessment of Jacob included intrapartum fetal asphyxia, chorioamnionitis affecting fetus or newborn, meconium aspiration, injury to scalp secondary to birth trauma, respiratory failure of newborn, and HIE (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy) for which HIE protocol for cooling was initiated. Upon arrival to the NICU, Jacob was initially placed on a conventional ventilator with oxygen saturations in the upper 80s. He was quickly transitioned to a high frequency ventilator/oscillator with excellent response. Jacob’s initial blood gas showed good ventilation and medical personnel were able to sequentially wean his amplitude, and he was started on 100-percent oxygen. He was passively cooled until three hours of life when active cooling was started. By 12:46 a.m., physical examination showed a more reassuring neurological examination, although high risk for seizures and neurologic sequelae was noted. Physical examination at four hours of life revealed Jacob was pink, alert, reacting appropriately to stimulation, reactive to light, had a positive suck reflex, gag reflex, mildly increased tone in all extremities, reflexes of 3+ in his lower extremities, 2+ in his upper extremities, slow grasp in feet and brisk grasp in hands. Jacob was discharged from the hospital on August 10, 2015 (day of life 39). His hospital course was complicated by glucose and electrolyte derangements, adrenal hemorrhage, seizures, hypotension, coagulopathy, E coli sepsis with presumed meningitis and poor feeding. The hospital discharge summary reflects that he was actively moving all extremities, had received antibiotics secondary to E coli sepsis and suspect meningitis, was weaned from the ventilator to a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP) at five days of life and had been stable on room air since July 11, 2015, was discharged with 10 mg of phenobarbital every 12 hours, that a physical exam revealed a mildly hypotonic normal male and that he had been on full oral feeding since August 3, 2015, with an appropriate weight gain pattern at discharge. The neurological status section of the hospital discharge summary reflects that Jacob's initial MRI on July 6, 2015, showed evidence of frontal and occipital cortical and subcortical injury globally. A repeat MRI on July 12, 2015, showed improvement in cortical injury with some evidence of injury over the head of the left caudate. He initially had seizure activity on EEG and was loaded with phenobarbital. The last two continuous EEGs on July 11, 2015, and July 16, 2015, however, showed no seizure activity, and the plan was to allow him to outgrow his phenobarbital dose. On August 12, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time difficulty breast feeding was reported by the mother. The pediatrician noted "no obvious developmental delays or difficulties" and "great tone." Counseling was given on breast feeding and feeding, and orders were given for evaluation and treatment by ophthalmology and occupational therapy. On August 24, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for sores in his mouth and feeding problems, and fussiness with spit up and vomiting in preceding days. He was on no medications at this time. His physical exam was normal. Neurological exam was also normal with present and normal newborn reflexes noted. "Great weight gain" was noted. Counseling was given concerning gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and feeding. On September 3, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time, his mother was curious as to whether he needed therapy for motor development. He was noted to be feeding well and complete resolution of his GERD symptoms was noted. Medications at that time included only ranitidine syrup (a stomach acid reducer). All areas of development were noted to be normal for his age and a physical examination, including neurological examination, were also normal. The pediatrician noted in assessment that although the mother reported a diagnosis of brain damage, her concerns regarding motor skills were not apparent, as Jacob was noted to be moving well, trying to roll, could lift his head, and was grasping a rattle in his stroller--all of which were noted to be "very impressive for 2 months." On October 29, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of right ear pain and discharge, low-grade fever, tugging at his ear, and fussiness. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. A physical exam was normal with the exception of crusty discharge noted in his ears. He was prescribed antibiotics and ranitidine was refilled. On November 10, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of congestion and ear drainage. There were no concerns with Jacob's feeding at this time, and he was noted to eat baby food and use a bottle. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. His physical exam was normal with the exception of erythematous noted in both ears. Antibiotics were prescribed. On November 23, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time Jacob was taking ranitidine daily for GERD and was in physical therapy/occupational therapy for delayed milestones and trouble sucking. He was noted to be eating solid foods since three months of age, eating baby food, and using a bottle. Ranitidine was refilled. "All areas of development are appropriate for age" was noted. A physical exam was normal. Plans for future care included continued use of ranitidine for GERD, continued therapies for delayed milestones, and a referral to otolaryngology for audiometry. On January 6, 2016, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a six-month follow-up visit. At this time it was noted that he was getting occupational and physical therapy weekly. It was also noted that he had been diagnosed with hand, foot, and mouth disease and had spots in his throat and discharge from his right ear. The only medication at this time was ranitidine, which was refilled. No concerns with his nutrition were noted. Developmental history testing revealed a “pass” in all areas, except difficulty rolling left to right and sitting alone. Allergic rhinitis symptoms were noted, however, a physical exam was normal. Plans for future care on this visit included referral for a failed hearing screening, continued ranitidine, and continued occupational therapy. At the request of NICA, Donald C. Willis, M.D., who is board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E. In his report dated August 10, 2016, Dr. Willis opined that, [t]here was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. At the request of NICA, Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D., who is board-certified in neurology, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E, and performed a thorough examination of Jacob on August 31, 2016. Dr. Sigurdardottir's report, dated August 31, 2016, reveals that Jacob's mother gave an "excellent history and timeline of the pregnancy with Jacob, his birth, and aftermath." Jacob's developmental history is reported by Dr. Sigurdardottir to include walking independently between 11 and 12 months of age; speaking five words; and report by mother of some hand tremors when reaching for objects. Jacob is noted to have been weaned from phenobarbital at six months of age and he has had no further seizure activity. Dr. Sigurdardottir's neurological exam revealed a pleasant and interactive boy interested in his surroundings. His motor exam revealed symmetric, normal muscle tone and equal use of both extremities. His gait was symmetric and seemed age appropriate. His reflexes were present and at times slightly increased, but never spread from right to left. Balance and coordination were noted to be difficult to fully assess, but seemed to be within normal limits for his age. He manipulated toys in a conventional manner with no autistic characteristics or repetitive behaviors seen. Dr. Sigurdardottir noted that Jacob had made a remarkable recovery and that there were no obvious abnormalities noted upon neurologic exam. Dr. Sigurdardottir concluded her report with her opinions that, The patient is found to have no substantial physical and/or mental impairment at this time. Jacob did have a neurological injury to the brain due to oxygen deprivation, and his hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is felt to be birth related. At this time, Jacob's prognosis for life expectancy and full recovery is good. Petitioner did not submit or introduce into evidence any expert reports rebutting the opinions of Dr. Willis or Dr. Sigurdardottir.
Findings Of Fact Uzziah Walker was born on November 23, 2012, at Sacred Heart Hospital located in Pensacola, Florida. Uzziah weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Uzziah. In an affidavit dated May 24, 2015, Dr. Willis described his findings in pertinent part as follows: In summary, there was no apparent fetal distress during labor. Spontaneous vaginal delivery resulted in a large subgaleal hemorrhage with blood loss and poor perfusion. The baby was not hypoxic at birth. Cord blood gas was normal (pH 7.25). However, blood loss from the scalp hemorrhage and poor perfusion resulted in intraventricular hemorrhage during the immediate post delivery period. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in scalp hemorrhage and poor perfusion with loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during the immediate post delivery period. The poor perfusion resulted in brain injury. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. NICA retained Michael Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Uzziah and to review his medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Uzziah on March 11, 2015. In an affidavit dated May 29, 2015, Dr. Duchowny opined in pertinent part as follows: Review of medical records and imaging studies sent on February 4 and 6, 2015 was performed. They detail Uzziah’s birth at Baptist Hospital Health System in Pensacola with a forceps assisted delivery after a rapid decent. Uzziah evidenced tachycardia and some retractions at the time of delivery but his Apgar scores were 7 and 8. He was observed to have a subgaleal hematoma; a CT scan of the brain on November 23 revealed a large soft tissue hematoma and a small collection of subdural blood over the right cerebellar tent with a small amount of right ventricular hemorrhage. Of note, there was no cerebral edema or ventricular compression. No skull fractures were noted despite bilateral subgaleal hematomas. The neonatal course was otherwise uncomplicated. In summary, Uzziah’s neurological examination today reveals normal findings. He does not exhibit either mental or physical impairment and his overall development has caught up and is proceeding in an age appropriate fashion. I believe that Uzziah’s perinatal hematomas were resorbed without residual brain injury and his future prognosis is excellent. I explained to his family that Uzziah is doing very well and that his future is favorable from a prognostic standpoint. Given Uzziah’s normal neurological status today, I am not recommending compensation with the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in scalp hemorrhage and poor perfusion with loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during the immediate post-delivery period, and that the poor perfusion resulted in brain injury. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that Uzziah’s overall development is proceeding in an age appropriate fashion and does not exhibit either mental or physical impairment. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion is credited.
