Findings Of Fact Zoe was born on May 21, 2019, at St. Mary’s Medical Center, a hospital, in West Palm Beach, Florida. Zoe was a single gestation and her weight at birth exceeded 2,500 grams. As set forth in greater detail below, the unrefuted evidence establishes that Zoe did not sustain a “birth-related neurological injury,” as defined by section 766.302(2). Donald Willis, M.D., a board-certified obstetrician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine, was retained by Respondent to review the pertinent medical records of Zoya Jones and Zoe and opine as to whether Zoe sustained an injury to her brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury that occurred during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital. In his report, dated September 14, 2020, Dr. Willis summarized his findings and opinions as follows: In summary, the mother presented in labor at term. There was no apparent fetal distress during labor. Spontaneous vaginal delivery resulted in a vigorous newborn with Apgar scores of 9/9. Newborn hospital course was complicated only by the somewhat confusing history for syphilis . . . The baby suffered a brain injury at some time remote from the CT scan at 2 months of age. The baby as not depressed at birth and the newborn hospital course was not complicated by multi- system organ failures. The brain injury does not appear to be birth related. * * * There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery or in the immediate post delivery period. In his supporting affidavit, Dr. Willis opines, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, that “there was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or in the immediate post-delivery period.” Respondent also retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, to review the medical records of Zoya Jones and Zoe, and to conduct an Independent Medical Examination (IME) of Zoe. The purpose of his review and IME was to determine whether Zoe suffered from a permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reviewed the pertinent medical records and, on October 15, 2020, conducted the IME remotely via Zoom teleconference. In his report, prepared November 6, 2020, he summarized his findings and opinions as follows: In summary, Zoe’s neurological evaluation reveals findings consistent with a substantial mental and motor impairment. She has spastic quadriplegic (double hemiparetic) cerebral palsy, oromotor incoordination, microcephaly, absence of receptive and expressive communication, sensorineural hearing loss in the left ear and pathologic developmental reflexes. Her level of development approximates that of a 3-6 month-old infant. Review of the medical records reveals that Zoe was born at 40 2/7 weeks gestation at St. Mary’s Hospital and weighed 6’12” [sic]. Pregnancy was complicated by several sexually transmitted diseases including a positive RPR that was treated with penicillin but secondarily increased near term. Pregnancy was also complicated by Type 2 HSV genital infection and trichomonas infection treated with metronidazole. Zoe was delivered vaginally with Apgar scores of 9 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes. Cord blood gases were not requested and there was no evidence of systemic organ dysfunction. Zoe was discharged from the nursery on the third day of life. * * * Based on today’s neurological evaluation and medical records review, I believe that while Zoe’s neurological impairments and permanent and substantial, they were most likely acquired in utero. The records do not provide support for intrapartum oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury, and the brain imaging findings are more consistent with a prenatally-acquired infections process that affected the brain. For these reasons, I am not recommending that consideration be given for Zoe’s inclusion in the NICA program. In his supporting affidavit, Dr. Duchowny opines, to a reasonable degree of medical probability, that Zoe did not suffer an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period which rendered her permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. The undisputed and unopposed findings and opinions of Drs. Willis and Duchowny are credited. The undersigned finds that Zoe did not sustain an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which rendered her permanently and substantially mentally and physical impaired.
The Issue The issue in this case is whether Jacob McGowan (Jacob) suffered a birth-related injury as defined by section 766.302(2), Florida Statutes, for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Jacob was born on July 2, 2015, at Shands at the University of Florida (Shands), Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida. The pregnancy, labor, and delivery of his mother, Christy Gonzalez, were managed by employees of UF Health Physicians and employees of Shands. At all times material, both the hospital and the physicians group were active members under NICA pursuant to sections 766.302(6) and (7). Christy Gonzalez, age 32, presented to Shands on July 1, 2015. This was her second pregnancy. Ms. Gonzalez's prior pregnancy resulted in an emergency cesarean section at 37 weeks after a failed induction/arrest of labor due to gestational hypertension. Based on orders given by OBGYN Georgia Graham, M.D., Christy Gonzalez was admitted to the Labor and Delivery Suite at approximately 12:05 p.m. Ms. Gonzalez was started on Pitocin at 2:47 p.m. for induction/augmentation. Labor progressed slowly over the next approximate 30 hours during which time Ms. Gonzalez continued on Pitocin and exhibited several periods of ongoing and apparent uncontrolled maternal hypertension. Fetal heart monitoring started at 8:13 a.m. on July 1, 2015, and, as labor progressed, the fetal heart rate pattern demonstrated accelerations, and late and early/variable decelerations. The fetal heart rate reached 90 and below at numerous points throughout the day on July 1, 2015, including at 9:34 a.m., 9:54 a.m., 11:04 a.m., 11:10 a.m., 1:05-1:48 p.m. (multiple decelerations), 2:11-2:15 p.m., 2:16-2:18 p.m., 2:31 p.m., and 9:36-9:38 p.m. On July 2, 2015, the fetal heart rate continued to demonstrate accelerations and decelerations with "High FHR" noted at 8:56 p.m. (156/67), as well as 9:15 p.m. and 9:21 p.m. The fetal monitor strips indicate prolonged periods of fetal distress throughout this long period of labor. At approximately 11:00 p.m. on July 2, 2015, Ms. Gonzalez was taken into the operating room for emergency cesarean section due to decreased variability and repetitive decelerations in the fetal heart rate. Jacob was born a live infant at 11:42 p.m. on July 2, 2015. Jacob was a single gestation, weighing 4,366 grams at birth. Jacob was delivered by Dr. Anushka Chelliah, who was a NICA participating physician on July 2, 2015. Petitioner contends that Jacob suffered a birth-related neurological injury and seeks compensation under the NICA Plan. Respondent contends that Jacob has not suffered a birth-related neurological injury as defined by section 766.302(2). Jacob was born via cesarean section secondary to failed induction and vaginal birth after cesarean section, and non- reassuring fetal heart rate tracing and nuchal cord. Jacob was delivered with no respiratory effort and a heart rate less than 60. Post-birth resuscitation included tactile stimulation, intubation, suctioning, and positive pressure ventilation. His Apgar scores were 1 at one minute, 3 at five minutes and 4 at 10 minutes. Physical examination at birth revealed he was pale, had poor tone and negative grasp, and poor moro and suck reflexes. Following color change and rise in his heart rate and increasing oxygen saturations, Jacob was transferred to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) for further management. Initial assessment of Jacob included intrapartum fetal asphyxia, chorioamnionitis affecting fetus or newborn, meconium aspiration, injury to scalp secondary to birth trauma, respiratory failure of newborn, and HIE (hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy) for which HIE protocol for cooling was initiated. Upon arrival to the NICU, Jacob was initially placed on a conventional ventilator with oxygen saturations in the upper 80s. He was quickly transitioned to a high frequency ventilator/oscillator with excellent response. Jacob’s initial blood gas showed good ventilation and medical personnel were able to sequentially wean his amplitude, and he was started on 100-percent oxygen. He was passively cooled until three hours of life when active cooling was started. By 12:46 a.m., physical examination showed a more reassuring neurological examination, although high risk for seizures and neurologic sequelae was noted. Physical examination at four hours of life revealed Jacob was pink, alert, reacting appropriately to stimulation, reactive to light, had a positive suck reflex, gag reflex, mildly increased tone in all extremities, reflexes of 3+ in his lower extremities, 2+ in his upper extremities, slow grasp in feet and brisk grasp in hands. Jacob was discharged from the hospital on August 10, 2015 (day of life 39). His hospital course was complicated by glucose and electrolyte derangements, adrenal hemorrhage, seizures, hypotension, coagulopathy, E coli sepsis with presumed meningitis and poor feeding. The hospital discharge summary reflects that he was actively moving all extremities, had received antibiotics secondary to E coli sepsis and suspect meningitis, was weaned from the ventilator to a continuous positive airway pressure machine (CPAP) at five days of life and had been stable on room air since July 11, 2015, was discharged with 10 mg of phenobarbital every 12 hours, that a physical exam revealed a mildly hypotonic normal male and that he had been on full oral feeding since August 3, 2015, with an appropriate weight gain pattern at discharge. The neurological status section of the hospital discharge summary reflects that Jacob's initial MRI on July 6, 2015, showed evidence of frontal and occipital cortical and subcortical injury globally. A repeat MRI on July 12, 2015, showed improvement in cortical injury with some evidence of injury over the head of the left caudate. He initially had seizure activity on EEG and was loaded with phenobarbital. The last two continuous EEGs on July 11, 2015, and July 16, 2015, however, showed no seizure activity, and the plan was to allow him to outgrow his phenobarbital dose. On August 12, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time difficulty breast feeding was reported by the mother. The pediatrician noted "no obvious developmental delays or difficulties" and "great tone." Counseling was given on breast feeding and feeding, and orders were given for evaluation and treatment by ophthalmology and occupational therapy. On August 24, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for sores in his mouth and feeding problems, and fussiness with spit up and vomiting in preceding days. He was on no medications at this time. His physical exam was normal. Neurological exam was also normal with present and normal newborn reflexes noted. "Great weight gain" was noted. Counseling was given concerning gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and feeding. On September 3, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time, his mother was curious as to whether he needed therapy for motor development. He was noted to be feeding well and complete resolution of his GERD symptoms was noted. Medications at that time included only ranitidine syrup (a stomach acid reducer). All areas of development were noted to be normal for his age and a physical examination, including neurological examination, were also normal. The pediatrician noted in assessment that although the mother reported a diagnosis of brain damage, her concerns regarding motor skills were not apparent, as Jacob was noted to be moving well, trying to roll, could lift his head, and was grasping a rattle in his stroller--all of which were noted to be "very impressive for 2 months." On October 29, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of right ear pain and discharge, low-grade fever, tugging at his ear, and fussiness. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. A physical exam was normal with the exception of crusty discharge noted in his ears. He was prescribed antibiotics and ranitidine was refilled. On November 10, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician with complaints of congestion and ear drainage. There were no concerns with Jacob's feeding at this time, and he was noted to eat baby food and use a bottle. Medications at this time included only ranitidine syrup. His physical exam was normal with the exception of erythematous noted in both ears. Antibiotics were prescribed. On November 23, 2015, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a well child visit. At this time Jacob was taking ranitidine daily for GERD and was in physical therapy/occupational therapy for delayed milestones and trouble sucking. He was noted to be eating solid foods since three months of age, eating baby food, and using a bottle. Ranitidine was refilled. "All areas of development are appropriate for age" was noted. A physical exam was normal. Plans for future care included continued use of ranitidine for GERD, continued therapies for delayed milestones, and a referral to otolaryngology for audiometry. On January 6, 2016, Jacob presented to his pediatrician for a six-month follow-up visit. At this time it was noted that he was getting occupational and physical therapy weekly. It was also noted that he had been diagnosed with hand, foot, and mouth disease and had spots in his throat and discharge from his right ear. The only medication at this time was ranitidine, which was refilled. No concerns with his nutrition were noted. Developmental history testing revealed a “pass” in all areas, except difficulty rolling left to right and sitting alone. Allergic rhinitis symptoms were noted, however, a physical exam was normal. Plans for future care on this visit included referral for a failed hearing screening, continued ranitidine, and continued occupational therapy. At the request of NICA, Donald C. Willis, M.D., who is board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology and maternal-fetal medicine, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E. In his report dated August 10, 2016, Dr. Willis opined that, [t]here was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby's brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury. I am unable to comment about the severity of the brain injury. At the request of NICA, Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D., who is board-certified in neurology, reviewed the medical records included in the Stipulated Record as Joint Exhibits A through E, and performed a thorough examination of Jacob on August 31, 2016. Dr. Sigurdardottir's report, dated August 31, 2016, reveals that Jacob's mother gave an "excellent history and timeline of the pregnancy with Jacob, his birth, and aftermath." Jacob's developmental history is reported by Dr. Sigurdardottir to include walking independently between 11 and 12 months of age; speaking five words; and report by mother of some hand tremors when reaching for objects. Jacob is noted to have been weaned from phenobarbital at six months of age and he has had no further seizure activity. Dr. Sigurdardottir's neurological exam revealed a pleasant and interactive boy interested in his surroundings. His motor exam revealed symmetric, normal muscle tone and equal use of both extremities. His gait was symmetric and seemed age appropriate. His reflexes were present and at times slightly increased, but never spread from right to left. Balance and coordination were noted to be difficult to fully assess, but seemed to be within normal limits for his age. He manipulated toys in a conventional manner with no autistic characteristics or repetitive behaviors seen. Dr. Sigurdardottir noted that Jacob had made a remarkable recovery and that there were no obvious abnormalities noted upon neurologic exam. Dr. Sigurdardottir concluded her report with her opinions that, The patient is found to have no substantial physical and/or mental impairment at this time. Jacob did have a neurological injury to the brain due to oxygen deprivation, and his hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is felt to be birth related. At this time, Jacob's prognosis for life expectancy and full recovery is good. Petitioner did not submit or introduce into evidence any expert reports rebutting the opinions of Dr. Willis or Dr. Sigurdardottir.
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Emmanuel Hooks, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Petitioner, Brianna Denise Davidson, is the mother and natural guardian of Emmanuel Hooks, a minor. Emmanuel was born a live infant on July 26, 1999, at Gulf Coast Medical Center, a hospital located in Panama City, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Emmanuel's birth was Steven G. Smith, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Emmanuel's birth At or about 9:10 p.m., July 25, 1999, Ms. Davidson (with an estimated date of delivery of July 26, 1999, and the fetus at 40 weeks gestation) presented to Gulf Coast Medical Center in labor. Initial vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 2-3 centimeters dilation, effacement as "thin," and the fetus at station -3. External fetal monitoring revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate (of 140-150 beats per minute), with accelerations. Ms. Davidson was continually monitored, and at 11:00 p.m., she was admitted to labor and delivery. At the time, uterine contractions were noted at 3-5 minute intervals, and vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 3 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -3. Ms. Davidson's labor apparently did not progress, and at 2:49 a.m., July 26, 1999, she was started on Pitocin. Thereafter, Ms. Davidson's labor progressed slowly, and at 6:45 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 5 centimeters, effacement at 90 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, external fetal monitoring continued to reveal a reassuring fetal heart rate. Ms. Davidson's labor continued to slowly progress, and by 9:00 a.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1. In the interim, at 8:48 a.m., Ms. Davidson's membranes spontaneously ruptured, with clear fluid noted. Thereafter, variable decelerations were noted with each contraction, consistent with umbilical cord compression, and fetal heart base line remained reassuring (in the 140-beat minute range). From 9:00 a.m. to 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson's labor failed to progress (with the cervix at 8 centimeters, effacement at 100 percent, and the fetus at station -1), and at 11:45 a.m., Ms. Davidson was transported to the operating room for delivery by caesarean section. Notably, between 9:00 a.m., and 11:45 a.m., while variable decelerations continued, the fetal heart rate base line remained in the 140-beat per minute range, and fetal electrode revealed the presence of short term variability. According to the records, Ms. Davidson was in the operating room at 11:45 a.m., anesthesia started at 11:45 a.m., surgery started at 12:32 p.m., and Emmanuel was delivered at 12:35 p.m. Of note, the "nucal cord x 1" observed during delivery was described as "loose," and fetal heart monitoring in the operating room and immediately prior to the caesarean section revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate. On delivery, Emmanuel was bulb-suctioned, but did not require resuscitation. Initial newborn assessment noted no apparent abnormalities, and Apgar scores were recorded as 8 at one minute and 9 at 5 minutes. The Apgar scores assigned to Emmanuel are a numeric expression of the condition of a newborn infant, and reflect the sum points gained on assessment of heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, reflex response, and color, with each category being assigned a score ranging from the lowest score of 0 through maximum score of 2. As noted, at one minute, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 8, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflect response being graded at 2 each, and color being graded a 0. At five minutes, Emmanuel's Apgar score totaled 9, with heart rate, respiratory effort, muscle tone, and reflex response again graded at 2 each, and color now graded at 1. Such scores are considered normal, and inconsistent with recent hypoxic insult or trauma. Following the initial newborn assessment, Emmanuel was transported to the regular nursery, where he remained until he was discharged with his mother on July 29, 1999. Notably, the newborn nursery admission assessment was grossly normal, and there is no evidence of any complication during Emmanuel's stay. Emmanuel's subsequent development On December 10, 2001, following the filing of the subject claim, Emmanuel was examined by Dr. Michael Duchowny, a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, electroencephalography, and clinical neurophysiology. Dr. Duchowny reported the results of his neurology evaluation, as well as the history he obtained from the parents, as follows: HISTORY ACCORDING TO MR. AND MRS. HOOKS: Emmanuel is a 2 1/2 year old boy who the parents indicated suffers from cerebral palsy and brain injury. They began by explaining that Emmanuel suffered brain injury at birth due to a cord being wrapped around his neck. He was delivered by emergency caesarean section. They noted that Emmanuel's MRI has shown periventricular leukomalacia and furnished a copy of the MRI report. Emmanuel's growth and developmental milestones have been slow. He did not rollover until 9 months, nor did he sit until a year of age. He stood at 14 months, walked at 18 months and said his first word at age 2. He now has a lexicon of only one word ("ma-ma"). Emmanuel is not toilet trained. He is described as being extremely active. He does not sit still at anytime during the day and it is difficult to examine him or provide therapy. He attends a wellness center where he receives physical, speech and occupational therapy on a twice weekly basis. Communication is a particular problem area for him. Emmanuel's appetite has also been diminished and he is now "only starting to eat". His mother indicated that Emmanuel suffers from "low muscle tone" and that he drools frequently. She also mentioned that he wakes up frequently at night and is just beginning to sleep more consistently. Emmanuel does not play with other children at school. His activity level and intrusiveness have precluded meaningful peer interactions. The parents are aware that his eye contact is poor. The parents stated that Emmanuel "had seizures", but then went on to explain that 2 EEG's were normal and he was never placed on medication. The events were described as "getting into a trance". He has not had motor convulsions. FAMILY HISTORY: Both parents are healthy. A 4 year brother had no medical problems and there are no family members with degenerative illnesses, mental retardation or cerebral palsy. Emmanuel was born at Gulf Coast Medical after a 39 week gestation. He weighed 8-pounds, 9- ounces at birth and breathed well. He was discharged from the nursery at 3 days of age. Emmanuel is fully immunized, has no significant drug allergies and never been hospitalized or undergone surgery. His vision and hearing are said to be excellent. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, but extremely active and well developed 2 1/2 year old toddler. Emmanuel weighs 39-pounds. His head circumference measures 50.2 cm and there are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. Emmanuel's neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. Emmanuel's NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION is difficult to complete, as he is constantly in motion. The physical examination requires restraint from his father, as he continually tries to touch things and pull items off the desktop and shelves. Emanuel has very poor eye contact and did not communicate in words at anytime during the session. It was difficult for him to follow commands as well, as his attention span constantly shifted. He drooled intermittently. The tongue movements are poorly coordinated. Cranial nerve examination reveals full visual fields to direct confrontation testing. There is blink to threat from either direction. I could not perform a fundoscopic examination. There are no facial asymmetries. Motor examination reveals mild generalized hypotonia with full range of motion. There are no adventitious movements, aside from the high activity level and no evidence of focal weakness or atrophy. Emmanuel's gait is stable, but slightly wide- based and he has generalized hypotonia. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ bilaterally and plantar responses are in flexion. There is withdrawal of all extremities to touch. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. Cerebellar testing could not be completed due to poor cooperation. In SUMMARY, Emmanuel's neurologic examination is significant for multiple areas of developmental delay. He is extremely overactive and inattentive, and has a significant behavior and communication problem. He additionally demonstrates poor eye contact and has a significant social disability. There are no specific focal or lateralizing findings to suggest a structural brain lesion. The findings on Emmanuel's neurologic examination suggests a diagnosis of a pervasive developmental disorder. Emmanuel fits within the autistic spectrum and this was communicated to the family . . . . The cause and timing of Emmanuel's neurological impairment To address the issue of whether Emmanuel's impairments were associated with an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital," as required for coverage under the Plan, Petitioner offered selected medical records relating to Ms. Davidson's antepartum course, as well as those associated with Emmanuel's birth and subsequent development. Additionally, Emmanuel's parents testified on their own behalf, and Respondent offered the deposition testimony of Dr. Duchowny, whose qualifications were previously noted, and the deposition testimony of Dr. Donald Willis, a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine. As for the cause and timing of Emmanuel's impairments, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on the results of his neurology evaluation and review of the medical records, that Emmanuel's impairments are not related to perinatal asphyxia or trauma. More particularly, Dr. Duchowny expressed his views, as follows: Q. Based on your review of the records and your evaluation of Emmanuel Hooks, can you give us an overview of his condition? A. Yes. I thought that Emmanuel's neurologic examination revealed evidence of developmental neurologic impairment. He was hyperactive and had an attention deficit disorder and additionally had significant behavior, social and communication problems. All of this suggested he had developmental problems in multiple areas, consistent with a diagnosis of pervasive developmental disorder. Many of the children with pervasive developmental disorder go on to develop childhood autism as they get older. * * * Q. In this particular case, do you believe that Emmanuel's condition was acquired during the course of labor-delivery in the immediate post-delivery period? A. No, I do not. Q. What is the basis for that opinion? A. The basis for my opinion is that autism is a developmental disorder which results from unknown factors operating in utero prior to the onset of labor and delivery and is not a recognized complication of birth asphysia or birth trauma. Q. I take it your opinion is that Emmanuel Hooks did not acquire whatever neurological deficits he had as a result of any oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during labor-delivery or the immediate post- delivery period? A. That's correct. Q. In fact, was there any evidence in the medical records of any oxygen deprivation that occurred during the course of labor- delivery or resuscitation during the immediate post-delivery period? A. No. Q. Was there any evidence of mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor- delivery or the immediate post-delivery resuscitative period? A. No, there was not? Q. In your opinion, were Emmanuel's problems acquired prior to the course of labor- delivery? A. Yes. As for Dr. Willis, he was also of the opinion that the medical records revealed no evidence of oxygen deprivation or other trauma associated with Emmanuel's birth. The medical records, as well as the testimony of the physicians and the parents, have been carefully considered. So considered, it must be concluded that the proof failed to demonstrate that any impairment Emmanuel suffers was occasioned by an injury to the brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period.
The Issue At issue is whether Robert Donald Vose, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Dawn Vose is the parent of Robert Donald Vose, a minor. Robert was born a live infant on August 15, 2001, at Baptist Hospital, Pensacola, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Robert's birth was Jill Prafke, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant, permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. To resolve whether Robert suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," the parties offered the medical records related to Robert's birth and subsequent development (Respondent's Exhibit 3), as well as the opinions of Donald C. Willis, M.D., a physician who practices maternal-fetal medicine, and Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology. (Respondent's Exhibits 1 and 2). With regard to injury, Dr. Willis was of the opinion that Robert suffered a brain injury (a venous sinus thrombosis and choroid plexus hemorrhage) at or around the time of delivery, that resulted in the development of hydrocephalus. However, he offered no opinion regarding the extent or significance of the brain damage. (Respondent's Exhibit 2). In contrast, Dr. Duchowny evaluated Robert on May 4, 2006, and concluded that his "normal neurological status together with a review of the accompanying medical records does not suggest that he has a substantial mental or motor impairment," as required for coverage under the Plan. (Respondent's Exhibit 1). Dr. Duchowny reported the results of his evaluation, and the basis for his opinion, as follows: I had the pleasure of evaluating Bobby Vose on May 4, 2006. Bobby is a 4-year-old, left-handed, prekindergarten student who was brought by his father for evaluation. This was conducted in my office at Miami Children's Hospital. HISTORY ACCORDING TO THE FATHER: Mr. Vose explained that Bobby was brought in order to "verify his abilities for NICA." He believes that Bobby is developing normally and in fact, is above average in several areas. He will be starting kindergarten in September and has done extremely well in his prekindergarten class setting. In fact, his language abilities are above average for age and he is bilingual with approximately 70 words of Spanish. He is a sociable boy who plays well with other children and his motor milestones have progressed normally. He sleeps through the night. His vision and hearing are intact. There has been no regression and no toxic or infectious exposure. Bobby is on no intercurrent medications. Bobby's PAST MEDICAL HISTORY is significant for placement of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt as a newborn. He apparently experienced an intercranial hemorrhage into the right ventricle and had a shunt placed from the anterior horn of the right ventricle into the peritoneal cavity. His shunt has functioned well and there have been no complications or revisions . . . . Otherwise, Bobby enjoys good health. He is not being followed for any chronic illnesses and has not required medical or surgical intervention subsequent to the newborn period. PERINATAL HISTORY: Bobby was born at Baptist Hospital in Pensacola at 37-weeks gestation. There was an attempt at a vaginal delivery but "the head was wedged" and Bobby was ultimately delivered by emergency cesarean section. He weighed 8 pounds and breathed well at birth. He remained in the hospital for approximately 11 days. GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: Bobby's father could not recall Bobby's motor or language milestones except to note that all occurred at the normal time. Bobby is fully immunized and has no known drug allergies. He has had a hernia repaired. * * * PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals an alert, well- developed, pleasant and cooperative 4-year- old boy. Bobby weighs 38 pounds. The skin is warm and moist. Bobby's head circumference measures 51.9 centimeters, which is within standard percentiles for age. The fontanels are closed. The ventriculoperitoneal shunt reservoir is palpated over the right frontal bone and shunt tubing is noted in the right anterior lateral neck region and across the thorax and abdomen. There is a healed right, upper quadrant abdominal scar. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. No dysmorphic features or cutaneous stigmata are noted. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The lung fields are clear and the heart sounds are normal. There is no palpable abdominal organomegaly. Peripheral pulses are 2+ and symmetric. NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION likewise discloses no significant findings. Bobby is alert, pleasant and cooperative. He answers all questions fluently with a good fund of information and an age appropriate stream of both thought and attention. He cooperated with all aspects of the evaluation. The cranial nerve examination reveals full visual fields to direct confrontation testing and normal ocular fundi. The optic disc margins are clearly demarcated and there is no optic pallor. There are no significant retinal findings. The extraocular movements are full and conjugate. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. There is blink to threat from both directions. The tongue is moist and papillated and moves well in all plains. The uvula is midline. The pharyngeal folds are symmetric. Motor examination reveals symmetric strength, bulk, and tone. There are no adventitious movements and no focal weakness or atrophy. The deep tendon reflexes are 2+ throughout. Plantar responses are downgoing. Station and gait are appropriate for age. The arm swing is symmetric. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial, or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Bobby's neurological examination in detail reveals no significant focal or lateralizing findings. The ventriculoperitoneal shunt is likely to be nonfunctional at this point. Bobby's normal neurological status together with a review of the accompanying medical records does not suggest that he has a substantial mental or motor impairment. . . . I, therefore, do not believe that he is eligible for compensation under the NICA statute.
The Issue At issue is whether Jhaleil Dixon, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Rosina Dixon is the natural mother and guardian of Jhaleil Dixon, a minor. Jhaleil was born a live infant on February 17, 2004, at Shands Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. The etiology of Jhaleil's impairments To address the likely etiology of Jhaleil's impairments, Ms. Dixon testified on her own behalf, and offered the testimony of Page Lutchman. In contrast, NICA offered the testimony of Donald Willis, M.D., a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, and maternal-fetal medicine, together with Dr. Willis' reports and the medical records related to Jhaleil's birth. Based on Dr. Willis' review of the medical records, it was his opinion that, within a reasonable degree of medical probability, Jhaleil did not suffer an injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation. In so concluding, Dr. Willis noted that Apgar scores were 3 and 7, at one and five minutes, respectively; that while depressed at birth, Jhaleil responded quickly to minimal resuscitation; umbilical cord blood gas was normal, with pH of 7.19 and base excess of -3.1; neurologic consultation was consistent with bilateral brachial plexus injury, not an injury to the brain or spinal cord; MRI of the spine on day 3 of life was negative; and, there being no evidence of multisystem system involvement (i.e., seizures, renal failure), Jhaleil's newborn stay was not otherwise consistent with injury to the brain or spinal cord. The opinions of Dr. Willis are rationally based, supported by the record, and credible. Consequently, it must be resolved that, more likely than not, Jhaleil's impairments were not the result of a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation. See Vero Beach Care Center v. Ricks, 476 So. 2d 262, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)("[L]ay testimony is legally insufficient to support a finding of causation where the medical condition involved is not readily observable."); Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)("The determination of the cause of a non-observable medical condition, such as a psychiatric illness, is essentially a medical question."); Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation."). Therefore, the proof fails to support the conclusion that Jhaleil suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," as required for coverage under the Plan.
