The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Wilgen Wandique, Jr., a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Wilgen Wandique and Concepcion Wandique, are the parents and natural guardians of Wilgen Wandique, Jr. (Wilgen), a minor. He was born a live infant on August 21, 1996, at Hialeah Hospital, a hospital located in Dade County, Florida, and his birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during the birth of Wilgen was Gustavo Ruiz, M.D., who was at all times material hereto, a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan), as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Wilgen's delivery at Hialeah Hospital on August 21, 1996, was apparently difficult due to his large birth weight, and was complicated by a shoulder dystocia. Following delivery, Wilgen was noted having evidence of a mild to moderate compromise of the upper right brachial plexus, an Erb's palsy, which affected the range of motion on the upper right extremity, including the arm, forearm, and hand. Otherwise, Wilgen's presentation was unremarkable, and he evidenced no abnormalities with regard to his mental status and, as hereafter noted, no motor abnormalities of central nervous system origin. A brachial plexus injury, such as that suffered by Wilgen during the course of his birth, is not, anatomically, a brain or spinal cord injury, and does not affect his mental abilities. Moreover, as heretofore noted, apart from the brachial plexus injury, Wilgen was not shown to suffer any other injury during the course of his birth. Consequently, the proof fails to demonstrate that Wilgen suffered an injury to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during the course of labor or delivery, and further fails to demonstrate he is presently permanently and substantially, mentally and physically impaired.
Findings Of Fact Robert Charles Crump was born on August 15, 2009, at Baptist South Hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida. Charlie weighed 2,505 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Charlie, to determine whether an injury occurred to the brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. In a medical report dated September 17, 2014, Dr. Willis described his findings in part as follows: In summary, the mother presented at 34 weeks with premature rupture of the membranes in early labor. Variable HFR [sic] decelerations developed during the last two hours prior to delivery. Cesarean section was done for the non-reassuring FHR pattern. The newborn was depressed. The newborn hospital course was complicated by respiratory depression, hypotension and one episode of apnea. Although the baby was discharged home with a normal exam, MRI at 16 months of age was done for evaluation of a weak left hand and found a prior cerebral stroke. It is likely the baby suffered some degree of oxygen deprivation during labor, delivery and/or in the immediate post resuscitation period. However, it is less clear that any oxygen deprivation during this time period resulted in brain injury. No head imaging studies were done during the newborn hospital course. The child did suffer a stroke, which was documented at 16 months of age by MRI. There was an apparent obstetrical event that likely resulted in some degree of oxygen loss to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery and continued into the immediate post delivery period. Without imaging studies during the newborn hospital course, I am unable to determine if this oxygen deprivation resulted in the child’s brain injury (stroke). Pediatric Neurology evaluation would be helpful in this determination. Dr. Willis reaffirmed his opinion in an affidavit dated March 8, 2016. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Charlie and to review his medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Charlie on November 5, 2014. In a medical report dated November 5, 2014, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: In summary, Charlie’s general physical and neurological examinations reveal a mild left hemiparesis, notable mainly for asymmetry of movement. His muscle tone is well-preserved and he has full range of movement bilaterally with the exception of full left supination. Charlie is functioning cognitively at age level. He has done remarkably well in his therapies. I reviewed the medical records sent on October 14, 2014. They document Charlie’s birth at 34 weeks gestation at Baptist Medical Center South in Jacksonville following premature rupture of membranes productive of blood-tinged amniotic fluid. Charlie was born by emergent Caesarian section for arrest of descent and presented limp, apneic and cyanotic. Apgar scores were 2 and 7 at 1 and 5 minutes. He was resuscitated via bag and mask and breathed spontaneously at just over 2 minutes. His NICU stay was complicated by apnea and bradycardia which resolved fully and transient respiratory depression. Charlie was never intubated or mechanically ventilated and was maintained on room air from August 17th until discharge on August 24th. No neonatal brain imaging was performed. MRI scan of the brain on February 8, 2011 revealed an old ischemic infarct involving the anterior limb of the right internal capsule. The remainder of the brain was normal. A consideration of the findings from today’s evaluation and record review lead me to recommend that Charlie not be considered for compensation within the NICA program. He has normal mental functioning and a mild motor deficit. Furthermore, his stroke was likely acquired prenatally, and there is no evidence of either mechanical injury or oxygen deprivation in the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Duchowny reaffirmed his opinions in an affidavit dated February 24, 2016. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was an apparent obstetrical event that likely resulted in some degree of oxygen loss to the baby's brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post- delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that Charlie has normal mental functioning and a mild motor deficit, and that his stroke was likely acquired prenatally. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion is credited.
The Issue At issue is whether Jhaleil Dixon, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts Rosina Dixon is the natural mother and guardian of Jhaleil Dixon, a minor. Jhaleil was born a live infant on February 17, 2004, at Shands Medical Center, a hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. The etiology of Jhaleil's impairments To address the likely etiology of Jhaleil's impairments, Ms. Dixon testified on her own behalf, and offered the testimony of Page Lutchman. In contrast, NICA offered the testimony of Donald Willis, M.D., a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, and maternal-fetal medicine, together with Dr. Willis' reports and the medical records related to Jhaleil's birth. Based on Dr. Willis' review of the medical records, it was his opinion that, within a reasonable degree of medical probability, Jhaleil did not suffer an injury to his brain or spinal cord caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation. In so concluding, Dr. Willis noted that Apgar scores were 3 and 7, at one and five minutes, respectively; that while depressed at birth, Jhaleil responded quickly to minimal resuscitation; umbilical cord blood gas was normal, with pH of 7.19 and base excess of -3.1; neurologic consultation was consistent with bilateral brachial plexus injury, not an injury to the brain or spinal cord; MRI of the spine on day 3 of life was negative; and, there being no evidence of multisystem system involvement (i.e., seizures, renal failure), Jhaleil's newborn stay was not otherwise consistent with injury to the brain or spinal cord. The opinions of Dr. Willis are rationally based, supported by the record, and credible. Consequently, it must be resolved that, more likely than not, Jhaleil's impairments were not the result of a brain or spinal cord injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation. See Vero Beach Care Center v. Ricks, 476 So. 2d 262, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)("[L]ay testimony is legally insufficient to support a finding of causation where the medical condition involved is not readily observable."); Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)("The determination of the cause of a non-observable medical condition, such as a psychiatric illness, is essentially a medical question."); Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation."). Therefore, the proof fails to support the conclusion that Jhaleil suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," as required for coverage under the Plan.
