Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find Similar Cases by Filters
You can browse Case Laws by Courts, or by your need.
Find 49 similar cases
CARLOS BARRIENTOS-MARTINEZ AND ASUNCION GUTIERREZ-ARREOLA, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF CARLA BARRIENTOS-GUTIERREZ, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 14-003124N (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Tampa, Florida Jul. 07, 2014 Number: 14-003124N Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2015

Findings Of Fact Carla Barrientos-Gutierrez was born on April 12, 2013, at Manatee Memorial Hospital located in Braden River, Florida. Carla weighed 3,610 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Carla. In an affidavit dated December 17, 2014, Dr. Willis described his findings as follows: In summary, vacuum assisted delivery resulted in a scalp hemorrhage with significant blood loss and resulting anemia, hypovolemia, hypotension and coagulation defects. Hypovolemia resulted in poor perfusion and multisystem organ failure. E. coli sepsis compounded the complications related to the scalp hemorrhage. The baby suffered brain injury due to these complications. However, the brain injury did not occur during labor delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D. (Dr. Duchowny), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Carla and to review her medical records. Dr. Duchowny examined Carla on October 15, 2014. In an affidavit dated December 17, 2014, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: In summary, Carla’s neurological examination reveals evidence of a mild to moderate motor disability and language development which is behind age level. There is no focal or lateralizing findings and I was unable to confirm the family’s impression of diminished left-sided motor activity. The medical record review indicates that Carla’s neurological impairments are the result of E-coli, sepsis and meningoencephalitis. She likely had diffuse CNS vasculitis as well. However, there is no indication that Carla’s brain damage resulted from either mechanical injury or oxygen deprivation in the course of labor and delivery. The timing of acquisition of her infection is open [sic] a question as she only became symptomatic at 24 hours of age. Should this issue need further examination, input from a pediatric infectious disease consult would be useful. It would be important to review her MRI scans of the brain. However, pending any need for further review, I am not recommending Carla for inclusion in the NICA program. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby's brain during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery period, and Petitioners have no objection to the issuance of a summary final order finding that the injury is not compensable under the plan. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no contrary opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Duchowny’s opinion that there is no indication that Carla's neurological injury resulted from either mechanical injury or oxygen deprivation in the course of labor and delivery. Dr. Duchowny’s opinion is credited.

Florida Laws (8) 766.301766.302766.303766.305766.309766.31766.311766.316
# 2
NEIL AND RENJINI KANNIKAL, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF NEHA, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH- RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 12-003889N (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Plantation, Florida Nov. 29, 2012 Number: 12-003889N Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2013

Findings Of Fact Neha was born on May 15, 2012, at Broward General Medical Center, located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Neha weighed six pounds nine ounces at birth. NICA retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., as its medical expert in pediatric neurology. Dr. Duchowny examined Neha on March 20, 2013, and reviewed her medical records. In an affidavit dated April 24, 2013, Dr. Duchowny opined as follows: Neha’s neurological examination is significant only for a mild degree of hypontia coupled with very slight motor development delay. In other regards, she seems to be developing quite well and I suspect that her language development will progress on schedule. There are no focal or lateralizing findings to suggest structural brain damage. A review of medical records reveals that Neha was born by stat cesarean section at Broward General Hospital due to fetal bradycardia. She was delivered with a full body nuchal cord and a true knot that was removed at birth. There was evidence of severe metabolic acidosis-arterial blood gases drawn 11 minutes after birth revealed a pH of 6.66, PC02 of 162, P02 of 11, and base excess of -32. These values were improved on a repeat series drawn at 12:27 PM. Thick meconium was suctioned below the vocal cords and Neha was diagnosed with meconium aspiration syndrome. Seizures occurred several after birth and were treated with phenobarbital and phenytoin. As previously stated by the family, Neha was immediately enrolled in a general hypothermia protocol. Of significance, a brain ultrasound exam obtained on May 15 at 6:46 PM, was normal and an MRI scan of the brain obtained on May 23 (DOL #8) was also within normal limits. Neha’s examination today does not reveal either a substantial mental or motor impairment, findings are consistent with the lack of significant MRI findings. I believe that the hypothermia protocol in all likelihood was neuro-protective and more likely than not, contributed to Neha’s positive outcome. Given Neha’s favorable outcome, I believe that she should not be considered for inclusion within the NICA program. As such, it is my opinion that Neha Kannikal is not permanently and substantially mentally impaired nor is she permanently and substantially physically impaired due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during the course of labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period in the hospital during the birth of Neha Kannikal. A review of the file does not show any opinion contrary to Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Neha does not have a substantial and permanent mental and physical impairment due to lack of oxygen or mechanical trauma is credited.

Florida Laws (9) 766.301766.302766.303766.304766.305766.309766.31766.311766.316
# 5
BRITTANY ISOM, ON BEHALF OF AND AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF MALIYAH JONES, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION (NICA), 15-001869N (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Interlachen, Florida Apr. 06, 2015 Number: 15-001869N Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2016

Findings Of Fact Maliyah Jones was born on May 28, 2013, at North Florida Regional Medical Center located in Gainesville, Florida. Maliyah weighed 3,870 grams at birth. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Maliyah. In a medical report dated September 15, 2015, Dr. Willis opined as follows: In summary, delivery was complicated by a shoulder dystocia, which resulted in an Erb’s palsy. Although depressed at birth, the baby had a good response to resuscitation (bag and mask ventilation) with an Apgar score of 9 at five minutes. The baby’s condition was stated to be stable on admission to the NICU. The newborn hospital course was complicated only by the Erb’s palsy. Discharge was on DOL 2. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. NICA retained Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D. (Dr. Sigurdardottir), a pediatric neurologist, to examine Maliyah and to review her medical records. Dr. Sigurdardottir examined Maliyah on October 28, 2015. In a medical report regarding her independent medical examination of Maliyah, Dr. Sigurdardottir opined as follows: Summary: Maliyah is a 2-1/2 year-old born at term after an uncomplicated pregnancy with shoulder dystocia resulting in a near complete Erb’s palsy. She has required 2 surgical procedures and does have significant disability as per the Mallet scale and is likely to need more surgical procedures to enhance her functional abilities in her right upper extremity. She is, however, functioning well from a cognitive level and her gross motor skills are otherwise intact. In review of the medical records available, it seems clear that her right brachial plexopathy did occur at birth due to mechanical injury. In light of her favorable cognitive and language development our findings are the following: Result as to question 1: The patient is found to have a permanent physical impairment, but to have none or mild delays in language development. She is therefore not found to have a substantial mental and physical impairment at this time. * * * In light of the above-mentioned details, Maliyah’s restricted motor disability and near normal cognitive development, I do not recommend Maliyah to be included into the Neurologic Injury Compensation Association Program and would be happy to answer additional questions or review further medical records. In light of her favorable mental and developmental state it is doubtful that additional records would alter the outcome of our review. She is not felt to have a substantial mental impairment at this time. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no expert opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby's brain or spinal cord during labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. There are no contrary expert opinions filed that are contrary to Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion that Maliyah is not found to have a substantial mental impairment at this time. Dr. Sigurdardottir’s opinion is credited.

Florida Laws (8) 766.301766.302766.303766.304766.305766.309766.31766.311
# 7
DEBORAH BIEDENHARN AND JOSEPH BIEDENHARN, F/K/A ALEXANDRA LOUISE BIEDENHARN vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 97-004217N (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Port St. Lucie, Florida Sep. 10, 1997 Number: 97-004217N Latest Update: Dec. 27, 1997

The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Alexandra Louise Biedenharn, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.

Findings Of Fact Fundamental findings Deborah Biedenharn and Joseph Biedenharn are the parents and natural guardians of Alexandra Louise Biedenharn (Alexandra), a minor. Alexandra was born a live infant on March 17, 1997, at Lawnwood Regional Medical Center, a hospital located in Fort Pierce, Florida, and her birth weight was in excess of 2500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services during the birth of Alexandra was Juliette Lomax-Homier, M.D., who was, at all times material hereto, a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the Plan), as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded under the Plan when the claimant demonstrates, more likely than not, that the infant suffered an "injury to the brain or spinal cord . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." Sections 766.302(2) and 766.309(1)(a), Florida Statutes. Here, Alexandra's neurologic condition is dispositive of the claim and it is unnecessary to address the timing or cause of her condition. Alexandra's neurologic status On October 2, 1997, following the filing of the claim for compensation, Alexandra was examined by Michael Duchowny, M.D., a board-certified pediatric neurologist. Dr. Duchowny's examination of Alexandra revealed no evidence of a substantial motor deficit, but did reveal evidence of mild hypertonia, which has shown progressive improvement over time. Alexandra's social and cognitive function evidenced no compromise and, with regard to such matters, she was progressing at age level. In Dr. Duchowny's opinion, which is credited, Alexandra is not currently substantially mentally and physically impaired and, consequent to any events which may have occurred at birth, is not likely to be so impaired in the future.

Florida Laws (10) 120.68766.301766.302766.303766.304766.305766.309766.31766.311766.313
# 9
TYLER DYAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PARENT OF OLIVER BENDER, A MINOR vs FLORIDA BIRTH-RELATED NEUROLOGICAL INJURY COMPENSATION ASSOCIATION, 12-001534N (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed:Jacksonville, Florida May 25, 2012 Number: 12-001534N Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2014

The Issue The issue in this case is whether Oliver Bender has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).

Findings Of Fact Tyler Dyal is the natural mother of Oliver Bender. Oliver was born a live infant at Orange Park Medical Center in Orange Park, Florida, on September 26, 2011. Orange Park Medical Center was a hospital licensed in Florida on September 26, 2011. The physician providing obstetrical services at the time of Oliver’s birth was Dr. Edelenbos. At all material times, Dr. Eric Edelenbos, North Florida Obstetrical and Gynecological Associates, P.A., was a participating physician in the Plan. Oliver weighed in excess of 2,500 grams at birth. None of the parties dispute that Oliver sustained an injury to the brain caused by oxygen deprivation during resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Donald C. Willis, M.D., NICA's expert, opined: In summary, labor was complicated by an abnormal FHR pattern and resulted in a depressed newborn. Umbilical cord blood gas was consistent with birth hypoxic with a pH of 6.87. The newborn hospital course was complicated by respiratory depression, apnea episodes and seizures. MRI identified hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. There was an apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery, and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury. I am not able to comment about the extent of the brain injury. At the time of Oliver’s birth, his Apgar scores were 3 at one minute, 6 at five minutes, and 8 at ten minutes, and he required resuscitation in the delivery room. His arterial cord gas pH was 6.872 with a base deficit of over 20, indicating that he had metabolic acidosis and had experienced hypoxia during labor and delivery. Intubation was attempted but was not successful; however, Oliver improved and did not require intubation thereafter. Oliver began having dusky spells around 24 hours of age with reported “staring” and tight tone. He also demonstrated jitteriness and irritability. By September 28, 2011, Oliver had begun to have seizures, which were treated with Phenobarbital. Oliver was transferred to Wolfson’s Children’s Hospital, where he continued to have stiffening of his extremities with arching and eye staring. On September 29, 2011, Oliver had an MRI which showed the following: FINDINGS: There are felt to be diffusion abnormalities present. These are more conspicuous on the B200 (more heavily diffusion weighted) images. These involve predominantly the gray matter involving the left frontoparietal region and the left MCA distribution. In addition there is slight restricted diffusion in the basal ganglia bilaterally. There is restricted diffusion along the calcarine fissures greater on the right than the left. There is a small amount of restricted diffusion in the right frontal lobe along the inferior aspect of the sylvian fissure and extending slightly superiorly. There is also slight restricted diffusion bilaterally felt to localize to the gray matter along in the gray matter of the occipital tips. The cerebellum appears preserved. These diffusion abnormalities are accompanied by subtle T2 prolongation of FLAIR images as well. There is otherwise no space-occupying lesion, mass effect or midline shift. There is no hydrocephalus. The corpus callosum appears well formed. The intracerebral flow voids on the T2 cube images appear preserved and symmetric. The patient appears to have a complete circle of Willis. IMPRESSION Areas of restricted diffusion in distribution as described above. The study discussed with Dr. Driscoll and overall the findings are felt to be consistent with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. No obvious focal vascular abnormalities are seen on the T2 cube images. As such this is likely secondary to somewhat global ischemic etiology rather than embolic phenomenon. There is no evidence of hemorrhage. Oliver was discharged from Wolfson’s Children’s Hospital on October 5, 2011, with no further seizure activity being noted. He was continued with Phenobarbital and still remains on the medication. When Oliver was five weeks old, he was seen by Dr. Alana Salvucci at Nemours. Dr. Salvucci’s assessment of Oliver revealed the following: Since Oliver has been at home, he has made good developmental progress. He is making eye contact and tracks. He startles to loud sounds. He moves both of his extremities equally and spontaneously. He smiles. Overall, his grandmother describes him as stiff, tending to hold his hands in a fisted position, but will open and grasp objects. He is on phenobarbital 2 mL twice a day, which is approximately 3.5 mg/kg per day. He has had no further events of stiffening concerning for seizure. However, he does have episodes where he stares off, typically to the right with no change in tone, lasting 1 to 2 minutes, occurs at least once a day. There are several times where caretakers can get his attention; however, most of the time, he will not respond to tactile or verbal stimuli. There are no associated oral automatisms or eye flutter. * * * Oliver has overall been doing well with no stiffening or jerking episodes, he has been smiling, and tracking and milestones have been appropriate for his age. Dr. Salvucci recommended that Oliver’s mother and grandmother videotape Oliver’s episodes of staring off and send the tape to Nemours for review. She arranged for a prolonged, at least four-hour, video EEG in hopes of capturing the staring episodes described by Oliver’s mother and grandmother. On December 29, 2011, Oliver had a four-hour, sleep-deprived EEG, which was normal with no clinical events during the EEG recording. No evidence was presented that established Oliver’s mother followed Dr. Salvucci’s recommendation to videotape one of Oliver’s staring episodes. On March 22, 2012, Oliver returned to Nemours and was seen by Dr. Harry Abrams. Dr. Abrams noted that Oliver had made good developmental progress since his discharge from Wolfson’s Children’s Hospital. Oliver had begun sitting up in a tripod position. He used both hands equally, reaching for objects and transferring objects. According to his mother, Oliver’s stiffness had significantly improved, but Oliver still had tight heel cords, making him tend to stand on his toes when bearing weight. Although not babbling, Oliver was making good eye contact, smiling, and tracking. During the visit, Oliver’s mother reported that at least twice a day Oliver had episodes where his arms stiffened and flexed at the elbow and that he was having jerking movements. She indicated that Oliver had been staring off, and there appeared to be transient episodes of unresponsiveness that lasted several seconds. Dr. Abrams recommended that an eight-hour video EEG be done in hopes of capturing one of the events with the upper extremity jerking. This recommendation was not followed. On January 17, 2013, Oliver was admitted to Wolfson’s Children’s Hospital for seizures accompanying a fever and cough. The seizure was a single episode in which Oliver was unresponsive for one minute and nonresponsive to verbal or tactile stimulation. The seizure caused grogginess, and Oliver slept afterwards. The seizure was characterized as generalized and staring. The postical symptom was confusion. His mother reported that this was the first seizure that Oliver had had since he was an infant. Oliver was treated with Klonopin and discharged the next day in stable condition. Oliver visited Dr. Abrams on April 16, 2013. Dr. Abrams noted that Oliver was doing well. Oliver had no significant evidence of delay. Oliver’s family advised that Oliver had done well, but at times Oliver would stare off and at other times, when he was drowsy or sleepy, he would put his fingers in his ears and shake his head back and forth. Dr. Abrams recommended that Oliver’s dosage of Phenobarbital begin to be tapered. In May 2013, Oliver had another seizure. Again, this seizure was accompanied by a high fever. His mother was about to give him Tylenol when Oliver suddenly stiffened and jerked for several minutes. The episode stopped spontaneously. As a result, Oliver’s dosage of Phenobarbital was increased. Oliver has not had another episode similar to the one he had in May 2013. His mother and grandmother report that he continues to have episodes in which he stares off and becomes confused. However, he returns to baselines after the staring episodes. Oliver is an active child; he can run, walk, and play. He is able to throw a ball and can drive a power-wheel car by pushing the pedal to drive it. He plays with other children. Oliver likes to play with his Hot Wheels cars. He can pull off his hats, socks, and clothes. He is able to turn pages in a book, and he can stack blocks. Oliver scribbles on paper with pens, pencils, and crayons. He can feed himself with utensils and drinks from a sippy cup. He can also drink from a straw. He can put his arms inside his sleeves when he is being dressed. When asked to point to his body parts, including his eyes, ears, hair, feet, hands, and belly button, he is able to do so. As of October 15, 2013, Oliver could speak approximately eight single words meaningfully and had not spoken any two-word phrases. His speech development at that time was not age appropriate. However, Oliver is able to use nonverbal communications effectively. When he is hungry, he smacks his lips and holds out his hands, indicating that he wants something to eat. He is able to understand and carry out verbal requests. He makes good eye contact. He can identify objects in pictures such as a ball, airplane, and ice cream cone by pointing to the objects. He is not receiving any type of therapy, such as physical, occupational, or speech therapy. Respondent retained Raymond Fernandez, M.D., to evaluate Oliver. Dr. Fernandez is board-certified in pediatrics and neurology together with child neurology and has been practicing pediatric neurology for 37 years. Dr. Fernandez reviewed Oliver’s medical records and performed independent medical examinations on Oliver on September 25, 2012, and October 15, 2013. After Dr. Fernandez’s examination on September 25, 2012, he felt that it would be appropriate to reexamine Oliver in six to nine months in order to track his developmental progress before coming to a final conclusion. After his second evaluation, Dr. Fernandez summarized his evaluation as follows: There is no evidence at this time, of substantial mental and motor impairment due to oxygen deprivation sustained during labor and delivery. Oliver has made good progress with his fine and gross motor skills and at this time, there is no convincing evidence for spasticity or cerebral palsy that was noted earlier. There is no reason to anticipate any reversal or regression in his motor skills, strength, or coordination. Expressive speech development has been delayed, but he is improving at a steady pace and this trend should continue. Receptive language skills are also improving steadily. Delay in speech and language skills, even when improving, is sometimes an early indicator of later learning difficulty in the classroom setting. Whether or not this will prove to be a problem for Oliver remains to be determined. It is a potential problem that should not be insurmountable with appropriate input from his teachers. At the time of Dr. Fernandez’s examination on October 15, 2013, Oliver was able to run without falling and had no abnormality in his gait. Intervenor, Orange Park Medical Center, retained Trevor Resnick, M.D., to evaluate Oliver. He is board-certified in pediatrics and neurology with a special competence in child neurology. Dr. Resnick reviewed Oliver’s medical records and examined Oliver. He opined Oliver’s staring spells and resulting confusion were partial complex seizures. These seizures have not been confirmed with a video EEG and have been witnessed only by his family. However, given the long history of these episodes, more likely than not, the episodes are partial complex seizures. When Oliver experiences a staring episode and resulting confusion, he will return to his baseline condition and is able to carry on with the activities previously described. The episodes are transient in nature; thus, any physical or mental impairment that occurs during the episode is not permanent. Dr. Fernandez’s opinion that Oliver does not have a substantial, permanent physical and mental impairment is credited.

Florida Laws (11) 395.002743.065766.301766.302766.304766.305766.309766.31766.311766.314766.316
# 10

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer