The Issue At issue is whether Elizabeth Ann Adams, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact April D. Adams and Jeffrey Floyd Adams are the natural parents of Elizabeth Ann Adams, a minor. Elizabeth was born a live infant on September 17, 2004, at St. Luke's Hospital, a licensed hospital located in Jacksonville, Florida, and her birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Elizabeth's birth by Michelle McLanahan, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth- Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Sufficient notice of participation in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan on the part of Michelle McLanahan, M.D., and St. Luke's Hospital was provided to April D. Adams. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired."3 § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. Here, Petitioners were of the view that Elizabeth suffered a subgaleal hemorrhage4 (a bleed) and resulting subgaleal hematoma5 (a collection of blood within the tissue) between the skull and scalp (outside the brain) resulting from the use of the vacuum extractor during delivery, and that the hemorrhage was substantial enough to result in hypovolemia, and ultimately hypoxic-ischemic brain injury.6 (Petitioners' Memorandum Regarding Final Order, pp. 5-7). In contrast, NICA was of the view that the record failed to support the conclusion that Elizabeth's brain injury was caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period and that, regardless of the etiology of her brain injury, Elizabeth was not permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. Intervenor expressed no position on the issue. Elizabeth's birth and immediate newborn course At or about 11:24 a.m., September 16, 2004, Mrs. Adams, with an estimated delivery date of September 20, 2004, the fetus at 39 3/7 weeks' gestation, and a history of mild pregnancy induced hypertension (PIH), was admitted to St. Luke's Hospital for induction of labor. There, initial physical examination revealed her membranes were intact, no vaginal bleeding, and external fetal monitoring revealed a reassuring fetal heart rate baseline of 150-160 beats per minute, average long term variability and no decelerations. At or about 12:40 p.m., an IV was started for hydration, and at 3:14 p.m., Mrs. Adams' membranes spontaneous ruptured, with clear fluid noted. At the time, vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 2 centimeters dilation, effacement at 70 percent, and the fetus at -3 station. In the interim, external fetal monitoring was reassuring for fetal well-being. Thereafter, Cytotec ("miso[prostol]") was placed vaginally to soften the cervix (for induction of labor). Mrs. Adams' progress continued to be monitored, and at 6:10 p.m., vaginal examination revealed the cervix unchanged. However, at 6:58 p.m., vaginal examination revealed some change, with the cervix at 3-4 centimeters, effacement at 70 percent, and the fetus at -3 station, and an intrauterine pressure catheter (IUPC) was placed to measure the force of contractions during labor. Fetal monitoring continued to be reassuring for fetal well-being, with a fetal heart rate baseline of 145-160 beats per minute, average long term variability, and no decelerations. At 8:16 p.m., Pitocin infusion (for labor induction) was started, and at 8:37 p.m., contractions were noted at 1-2 minutes, and vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 5 centimeters dilation, effacement at 70 percent, and the fetus at -1 station. Fetal monitoring continued to be reassuring, with a baseline in the 150s. Mrs. Adams' progress continued, albeit slowly, with a prolonged second stage of labor (the expulsion/pushing stage) lasting more than two and a half hours,7 and at 5:03 a.m., September 17, 2004, Elizabeth was delivered vaginally, with vacuum assistance (three attempts). Of note, approximately three hours before delivery, recurrent variable decelerations and a mild baseline tachycardia developed, and approximately eight minutes before delivery severe, repetitive variable decelerations developed which prompted the vacuum-assisted delivery. At delivery, Elizabeth was dried, stimulated, and bulb-suctioned, otherwise no resuscitation measures were required. Apgar scores were good (8 and 9, at one and five minutes).8 Physical examination at 5:10 a.m., revealed no abnormalities, with the exception of an elevated temperature (102.7, rectal) and skin color (acrocyanosis was noted).9 By 5:40 a.m., skin color was noted as pink. Elizabeth roomed-in at her mother's bedside, and was routinely monitored by hospital staff. Of note, Elizabeth's temperature remained elevated until 1:30 p.m., when it was documented at 98.1 (auxiliary). In the interim, at 11:58 a.m., with temperatures of 100.0 (auxiliary) and 100.7 (rectal), complete blood count (CBC) and blood cultures were drawn. The CBC results revealed an elevated white blood count. Under the circumstances, the attending physician (Dr. Schwartz) noted, at 4:34 p.m., "[w]ill repeat CBC in a.m. . . . [w]ill not st[art] ABX unless temps elevated again." Blood culture was subsequently reported as negative. It also may be noted, although not shown to be clinically significant, that Elizabeth's behavior was, starting at 6:10 a.m., periodically described as "irritable" and "fussy." (Exhibit 18, pp. 22-24). Otherwise, Elizabeth's newborn stay was without incident, with normal newborn examinations, breastfeeding well, and voiding and stooling appropriately, until 8:35 p.m., when the attending nurse made the following entry in the records: Assumed care of infant. Infant/Mom ID # checked/verified. Physical assessment done and noted. Infant noted to be jittery and irritable. Mom states that infant has not breastfed since 1700-1730. Temp stable now at 98.8. Infant noted to settle after wrapping. Placed in mother's arms. Mom will breastfeed infant shortly. Will eval infant's next feeding. Thereafter, at 8:42 p.m., the attending nurse made the following entry: Called into room by parents. States that infant shreiked then arched her back and turned purple. Upon enter room infant's color noted to be dusky with purple lips. Left eye noted to be turned in and rt eye gazed. Unwrapped and body noted to be modled but no shaking present at this time. Infant taken to nicu for immediate evaluation. Elizabeth's subsequent care was summarized in her Discharge Summary, as follows: . . . Nursing brought the infant to this Special Care Nursery and it was felt that the infant was having seizure activity. At this point a complete septic workup was performed. The infant was placed on IV antibiotics and further cultures including spinal fluid were sent. The workup was initially benign; however, a CT scan [on September 18, 2004] was within normal limits except that J. Norman Patton, M.D., Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Internal Medicine, could not completely rule out some mild evidence of inflammatory response in the brain . . . . The CT scan of September 18, 2004, was done to rule out a bleed as the cause of Elizabeth's seizures, and was read as follows: CT head without and with contrast. Iodinated contrast was given per protocol. Nonionic contrast was utilized. Small subgaleal hematoma in the biparietal locations. The intracranial contents appear unremarkable. Specifically, there is no evidence for parenchymal/extra-axial hemorrhage, nor pathologic enhancement. The ventricle volume is within normal limits, and without midline shift. A subgaleal hematoma or hemorrhage is a bleeding between the skull and the skin on the outside of the skull (scalp), and not within the brain. (Exhibit 18, pp. 15, 16, and 18). The Discharge Summary continued, and documented Elizabeth's care as follows: At this point acyclovir was also added to the antibiotic regimen. The CSF PCR was negative, but surface cultures revealed positive HSV [herpes simplex virus] in the rectal swab, although negative in the oropharynx. For this reason the infant was continued on acyclovir for a total of 21 days. After negative cultures the ampicillin and gentamicin were discontinued. The infant also required mild oxygen in this period and was placed on 1.5 liters 30-40%. Over the next several days this was able to be discontinued. Dr. Gamma, Pediatric Neurology, was involved in the patient's case and consulted on a regular basis. EEG was consistent with seizure activity. The infant was on phenobarbital and later secondary to continued occasional seizures, was started on Cerebyx. The goal was to get this infant's phenobarbital level to between 20 and 30; however, the infant metabolized the phenobarbital very well and despite increasing the dose, the phenobarbital level remained in the 19-20 range. Eventually the Cerebyx was discontinued and the infant is discharged home only on phenobarbital. The infant initially was fed fairly slowly, but by the end of admission was eating well and gaining weight steadily. The infant was ready for discharge on 10/09/04 following 21 days of acyclovir and at this point the infant had a phenobarbital level of 19.3 and a weight of 3940 grams or 8 pounds 11 ounces. The parents have been very involved with the infant, visited often, and have demonstrated good care for this baby. The infant's workup also includes urine for amino acids, which was within normal limits. Liver function tests were within normal limits. Screening CBCs were within normal limits. Ammonia was normal at 36. Urine organic acids were within normal limits . . . . An MRI performed on September 22, 2004, revealed: . . . restricted diffusion in the left occipital lobe, both parietal and frontal lobes, worse on the left, consistent with cytotoxic edema as seen in infarction, secondary to ischemic and or sequelae of severe meningoencephalitis The ventricle volume is within normal limits, and without midline shift. A head ultrasound performed on September 30, 2004, was normal and reported, as follows: Using the anterior fontanelle as an acoustic window, routine coronal and sagittal images were obtained. No evidence for intracranial or germinal matrix hemorrhage. Ventricles are not dilated and appear normal in shape and position. No obvious parenchymal abnormality. Elizabeth was discharged on October 9, 2004. Physical examination on discharge was noted in her Discharge Summary, as follows: Physical exam on discharge revealed a discharge weight of 3940 grams, length of 53 cm, and head circumference of 35.5 cm. The infant was well-developed, well- nourished, alert, pink non-jaundiced female in no acute distress. HEENT was negative. Anterior fontanelle was soft and flat. Lungs were clear to auscultation in no distress. Heart - Regular rhythm without murmur. Abdomen - Soft, benign and nontender. GU - Normal female. Back - Normal extremities, negative Ortolani, negative bilaterally. Neurologic exam intact. Discharge medication was phenobarbital. Follow-up was recommended with pediatrics, neurology, Early Intervention Program at Shands, and Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy at Nemours. Discharge Diagnoses were: HSV ENCEPHALITIS - SEPSIS. NEONATAL SEIZURES. TERM FEMALE NEWBORN. Of note, subsequent testing revealed that Elizabeth had not been exposed to the herpes simplex virus (HSV), and the positive HSV result was a false positive. Elizabeth's subsequent development Following Elizabeth's discharge from St. Luke's, she was evaluated by the Early Intervention Program (in October 2004) to resolve whether she qualified for services. At the time, it was felt Elizabeth did not qualify for the program, as her development was within normal limits (WNL) for her age. However, in March 2005, at age 6 months, Elizabeth was reevaluated and found eligible for occupational, speech, and physical therapy services due to motor and language delay. Those services were discontinued by October 2005, since Elizabeth's developmental growth appeared age appropriate. (Exhibit 7). Elizabeth was weaned off phenobarbital at age 15 months (about December 2005) and remained seizure-free until October 13, 2006, when a seizure was noted and she was ultimately transported (after treatment in a local emergency room) to Wolfson's Childrens Hospital (Wolfson's) in Jacksonville. There she was loaded with phenobarbital and Dilantin, the seizures stopped, and on October 15, 2006, she was discharged on maintenance dosage of phenobarbital. However, on October 16th, she had a second seizure and was readmitted to Wolfson's, and then on October 18, 2006, discharged on an increased dosage of phenobarbital. Thereafter, in December 2006, her medication was changed from phenobarbital to Trileptal. (Exhibit 9). Since that time, Elizabeth has experienced seizures on four occasions, three of which she was treated at Wolfson's (April 17-19, 2007; March 19-20, 2008; and July 10, 2008) and the last of which (March 1, 2009) she apparently was treated at home in North Carolina. (Exhibits 9 and 27). Apart from her seizure disorder, Elizabeth's health has been good, and developmentally she continued to make good progress, without the need for any therapies since they were discontinued in October 2005. Currently, Elizabeth attends a regular school program, and was shown to evidence very mild physical impairment and no mental impairment. (See, e.g., Exhibits 16, 17, and 19). Whether Elizabeth suffered a "birth-related Neurological injury" To address whether Elizabeth suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," the parties offered a Stipulated Record (Exhibits 1-28), that included the medical records associated with Mrs. Adam's antepartal course, the medical records associated with Elizabeth's birth and subsequent development, the deposition testimony of the delivering obstetrician (Dr. McLanahan), and the deposition testimony of Mr. and Mrs. Adams. The parties also offered the deposition testimony of Donald Willis, M.D., a physician board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, and maternal-fetal medicine, and Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, electroencephalography, and neurophysiology. Based on his evaluation of the medical records, it was Dr. Willis' opinion that Elizabeth did not suffer a brain injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period.10 In so concluding, Dr. Willis observed Elizabeth was not depressed at birth; her Agpar scores were normal (8 at one minute, and 9 at five minutes); she did not require any significant resuscitation (only stimulation and bulb- suctioning); and her newborn course was without incident until seizures were noted at 16 hours after birth. As for the subgaleal hemorrhage (the bleed between the skull and the scalp) Elizabeth was shown to have suffered (on the CT scan of September 18, 2004), Dr. Willis agreed it was likely related to the vacuum-assisted delivery. As for the cause of the periventricular hemorrhage (brain injury/stroke) Elizabeth was shown to have suffered (on the MRI of September 22, 2004), Dr. Willis voiced no opinion, and deferred to the expertise of a pediatric neurologist. As for Petitioners' theory of the case, that a subgaleal hemorrhage can progress to cause bleeding within the brain as a result of hypovolemia, Dr. Willis agreed. However, he did not see evidence in this case to suggest such a causative connection. Dr. Willis expressed his opinion, as follows: Q. Tell me why you don't think, if you don't think, that her brain injury is related to the vacuum extraction? A. Well, subgaleal hemorrhage is between the skull and the skin on the outside of the skull, and that's very common with vacuum extractions. But the only way that that can cause a brain injury that I'm aware of is that if so much hemorrhage occurs into that hematoma that the baby becomes hypovolemic and has a stroke due to hypovolemia and low blood pressure related to blood loss. I am not aware that this child had a subgaleal hematoma that was to that extent. (Exhibit 18, pp. 17 and 18). See also Exhibit 18, p. 35. Dr. Duchowny evaluated Elizabeth on September 10, 2008. Based on his evaluation, as well as his review of the medical records, Dr. Duchowny was of the opinion that Elizabeth's impairments were likely the result of a meningoencephalitis (an "inflammation of the brain and meninges"11), resulting from a viral infection, albeit not HSV, as opposed to a brain injury caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring during labor or delivery. Dr. Duchowny was also of the opinion that Elizabeth was neither substantially mentally nor substantially physically impaired. (Exhibits 15 and 19). Dr. Duchowny described the results of his evaluation, and the bases for his opinions, as follows: Q. . . . During that examination did you obtain any medical history from Elizabeth's family? A. Yes. Q. What was the history that you obtained? A. I was able to speak to Elizabeth's mother, who was the person, the caretaker, bringing Elizabeth to my office; and she first talked about Elizabeth's seizures, which began shortly after birth, at age sixteen hours; and continued with a total of five seizures during her life. The seizures, although infrequent, were prolonged, and her mother indicated that they lasted between three and five hours, all of which, obviously, resulted in hospitalizations. They were terminated with rescue Diastat in order to stop the status epilepticus. All of Elizabeth's seizures began on the right side of her body but then would generalize to involve both arms and both legs, and most recently Elizabeth has been treated which Trileptal, which apparently has brought the seizures under control. Her mother then went on to describe mild weakness on the right side of Elizabeth's body. She commented that Elizabeth had trouble with fine motor coordination, particularly a pincer grasp, and as a result was a left hander. However, Elizabeth's overall motoric ability was good. She didn't have any specific limitations to her motor abilities, and she was fully functional for her age, which at that time was three years. On a positive note, her mother indicated that her mental development was going well, that there were no delays in her acquisition of speech and language, and that she was in the New Dimensions Preschool Program where she was attending a regular classroom. There has never been any regression of Elizabeth's abilities, and at the time that I evaluated Elizabeth in September, she did not have an ongoing need for either physical or occupational therapy. Otherwise, things were good; she was healthy. She was under the care of Dr. Harry Abrams at Nemours Children's Hospital. She continued to have abnormal EEGs, and her mother commented that her MRI scan of the brain revealed damage, primarily on the left side of her brain. Q. What information, if any, did you obtain regarding her birth? A. Well, again, this was information from Elizabeth's mother, and she told me that Elizabeth was born after a term gestation at St. Luke's Hospital. It was a natural delivery, but with the assistance of a vacuum for the extraction. Elizabeth weighed seven pounds, eleven ounces. She breathed well. She was not a jaundice baby, but that she remained in the NICU at St. Luke's Hospital for a treatment of suspected infection with the herpes simplex virus; so essentially, a herpes simplex encephalitis concern. Q. Thank you. Did you obtain any information with respect to Elizabeth's growth and development? A. Yes. Elizabeth rolled over and sat at six months and then was able to stand at age ten months. She was walking on her own by age thirteen months and began talking in single words between a year and age eighteen months. At the time I saw her she had not yet been toilet trained, but she received all of her immunizations and had no known allergies to medications. She had undergone surgery on two occasions for the ear tubes and, of course, there were the multiple hospitalizations for the recurrent bouts of status epilepticus. Q. Did you perform a physical examination of Elizabeth? A. Yes. Q. What were your findings upon that examination? A. When I saw her, she was actually quite cooperative so, socially, she was very appropriate for her age. She seemed appropriately nourished and developed. Her weight was recorded at thirty-five pounds. There was no abnormalities of her skin, neck and she had no abnormal aspects of her body which suggested a malformation. I noted that her spine was normal. Her head growth was good. She had a head circumference of 49.1 centimeters, which for age three years is within standard percentiles. There were no abnormalities of her heart, her lungs, her abdomen, and her extremities or her peripheral pulses. Q. Did you also perform a neurological examination of Elizabeth? A. Yes. And once again, in terms of her social abilities, she actually was quite good for her age and she was appropriately verbal at her age level. She answered questions, she provided decent verbal content. I thought her speech sounds had a very mild disarticulation, but she knew her colors. She was able to identify parts of her body, and she was able to draw with a pencil using her left hand. No drooling was noted. Examination of her cranial nerves was essentially normal, and her motor examination revealed a well developed, age appropriate amount of muscle strength, bulk of her muscle and muscle tone. I was unable to detect any specific focal weakness, although, again, there was a difference in terms of her fine motor coordination. Even though she used both hands cooperatively, she clearly preferred her left hand, although I was able to demonstrate a pincer grasp bilaterally and reasonably good manual dexterity. Where I did think there was asymmetry had to do with her walking where her left arm would swing in a more prominent fashion on the left compared to the right. Also, there was a tendency actually for both feet to turn in, but this was more prominent, again, on the right side. I thought that Elizabeth's sensory examination was normal and that her gait was appropriate in terms of coordination, despite the asymmetric arm swing. Her deep tendon reflexes were normal and symmetric on both sides of the body, in other words, both arms and legs; and her plantar response, which is a reflex response to stroking the bottom of the feet, was normal. There were no abnormalities of her neurovascular examination, meaning that there were no asymmetries when a stethoscope was placed on her neck, head or over her eyes. The bones of her skull were closed, which was appropriate. Q. Okay. Thank you. Based upon your review of the medical records and documents which you identified earlier, and based upon your examination of Elizabeth and the findings from that examination, were you able to form an opinion as to the nature and extent of Elizabeth's neurological delays or developmental delays, if any, and the etiology of those delays? A. Well, there were some findings on the neurological exam with respect to Elizabeth's motor coordination, and my impression was that these findings were, at best, mild. I would characterize them really as very mild. Q. Specifically, what are those findings? A. The asymmetric arm swing, the establishment of handedness on the left and slightly decreased -- well, really, minimal, minimal change in dexterity. Really, the arm swing and the handedness. Q. And those delays that you've identified and, as I understand it, it's your opinion that you would characterize those as mild? A. Yes. Q. What functional impact, if any, do those mild delays have on Elizabeth based upon your examination of her when you saw her? A. Well, at present I would have predicted that there would be no compromise to her functionality, and that appeared to be the case. Q. With respect to her cognitive development, what were you able to conclude based upon your review of the medical records and your examination of her? A. My examination revealed normal cognitive development; in other words, a level of mental function, which was at age level. So I was, again, not surprised that she was in a regular class at the New Dimensions Preschool. Based upon your review of the medical records, were you able to form an opinion as to the etiology of any of those neurological problems that were identified? A. Well, from a review of the records, I think that there was a strong indication that Elizabeth had had some kind of meningoencephalitis in the first week of life, and I believe that her findings on neurological examination today are related to the previous bout of meningoencephalitis. Q. Do you have an opinion as to whether or not Elizabeth suffers from a substantial mental impairment? A. I do, and that is that I do not believe that Elizabeth has a substantial mental impairment. Q. Do you have an opinion as to whether or not Elizabeth suffers from a substantial physical impairment? A. I do not believe that Elizabeth has a substantial physical impairment either. * * * Q. . . . You mentioned the motor findings that you described as, at best, mild, or very mild, and you listed the asymmetrical arm swing, and the handedness on the left and the minimal loss of dexterity. I think your findings also included abnormalities in the gait, is that correct? A. Yes, that's true. There was a toe-in position bilaterally, but I didn't see that as a functional problem. She did that, but it didn't seem to contribute to any disability at all . . . . (Exhibit 19, pp. 7-16). When, as here, the medical condition is not readily observable, issues of causation are essentially medical questions, requiring expert medical evidence. See, e.g., Vero Beach Care Center v. Ricks, 476 So. 2d 262, 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)("[L]ay testimony is legally insufficient to support a finding of causation where the medical condition involved is not readily observable."); Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242, 245 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)("The determination of the cause of a non-observable medical condition, such as a psychiatric illness, is essentially a medical question."); Wausau Insurance Company v. Tillman, 765 So. 2d 123, 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)("Because the medical conditions which the claimant alleged had resulted from the workplace incident were not readily observable, he was obligated to present expert medical evidence establishing that causal connection."). Here, the opinions of Doctors Willis and Duchowny were logical, consistent with the record, not controverted, and not shown to lack credibility. Consequently, it must be resolved that the cause of Elizabeth's impairments was most likely a meningoencephalitis, as opposed to a "birth-related neurological injury," and, regardless of the etiology of her impairments, she is not permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. See Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.").
Findings Of Fact Jaliyah was born on March 7, 2017, at Lakeland Regional Medical Center. With respect to Jaliyah’s birth, obstetrical services were delivered by Maria Martino, M.D., a NICA participating physician, in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period. NICA retained Donald Willis, M.D., an obstetrician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine, to review Jaliyah’s medical records and opine as to whether there was an injury to her brain or spinal cord that occurred in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury. In his report and subsequent affidavit (attached to NICA’s Motion), Dr. Willis opines that “there was an obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery and continuing into the immediate post deliver [sic] period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in brain injury.” NICA also retained Laufey Y. Sigurdardottir, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, to review Jaliyah’s medical records, conduct an Independent Medical Examination (IME), and opine as to whether she suffers from a permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of a birth-related neurological injury. Dr. Sigurdardottir reviewed the available medical records, obtained a full historical account from Petitioner, and conducted an IME of Jaliyah on December 13, 2017. Dr. Sigurdardottir’s affidavit, attached to NICA’s Motion, provides in pertinent part, as follows: Based upon my education, training and experience, it is my professional opinion, within a reasonable degree of medical probability that although there is evidence of impairment consistent with a neurologic injury to the brain or spinal cord acquired due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury, Jaliyah is not found to have substantial delays in motor and mental abilities. Her prognosis for full motor and mental recovery is excellent and her life expectancy is full. A review of the file reveals that no contrary evidence was presented to refute the findings and opinions of Dr. Willis and Dr. Sigurdardottir. Their unrefuted opinions are credited.
Findings Of Fact Daisy Posada was born on December 1, 2014, at Tampa General Hospital in Tampa, Florida. Donald Willis, M.D., an obstetrician specializing in maternal-fetal medicine, was requested by NICA to review the medical records of Daisy Posada and to opine whether an injury occurred in the course of labor, delivery or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period at Tampa General due to oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury. In a report dated December 29, 2017, Dr. Willis described his findings in pertinent part as follows: In summary, delivery was complicated by a significant shoulder dystocia, requiring multiple maneuvers to complete the delivery. The newborn was depressed with Apgar of 0/0. Full resuscitation was required. The newborn hospital course was complicated by multi- system organ failures. The initial ABG, which was done after resuscitation, had a pH of only 692. EEG was abnormal, but MRI was reported as normal. * * * There was an obstetrical event (shoulder dystocia) that resulted in loss of oxygen to the baby’s brain during delivery and continuing into the immediate post delivery period. The oxygen deprivation resulted in at least some degree of brain injury initially, based on the abnormal EEG. However, the brain MRI was normal. There was no mechanical trauma or injury to the spinal cord. Attached to Respondent’s Motion for Summary Final Order is the affidavit of Dr. Willis, dated April 2, 2018. In his affidavit, Dr. Willis affirms the findings in his above-quoted report and maintains that his opinions are within a reasonable degree of medical probability. NICA also retained Michael S. Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist, to review Daisy Posada’s medical records and to conduct an Independent Medical Evaluation of her and to opine as to whether she suffers from a permanent and substantial mental and physical impairment as a result of a birth-related neurological injury. Dr. Duchowny reviewed the medical records, obtained historical information from Ms. Arellano Benitez, and performed an evaluation on January 31, 2018. In a report authored after the neurological evaluation, Dr. Duchowny summarized his findings, in pertinent part, as follows: In SUMMMARY, Daisy’s neurological examination today reveals no specific findings apart from very slight decreased supination of the left hand. She does not otherwise display left upper extremity weakness and has full range of motion. The examination reveals no functional compromise of the left upper extremity, and the remainder of the neurological examination is unremarkable. * * * Despite a complicated perinatal course, Daisy has developed well-therapeutic hyperthermia may have contributed to her favorable outcome responsible [sic]. As there is no evidence of a substantial mental or motor impairment, I do not believe that Daisy should be considered for inclusion within the NICA program. Respondent’s Motion for Summary Final Order also relies upon the attached affidavit from Dr. Duchowny, dated March 27, 2018. In his affidavit, he affirms the findings contained in his report and opines, based upon his education, training and experience, within a reasonable degree of medical probability, that Daisy Posada has not suffered a substantial mental or physical impairment. A review of the file reveals that no contrary evidence was presented to dispute the findings and opinions of Dr. Willis and Dr. Duchowny. Their opinions are credited.
The Issue At issue is whether Gavin Leonard John Chattic (Gavin), a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact By their Joint Stipulation of Facts, the parties have agreed that: On October 24, 2007, the Petitioners as parents and natural guardians of Gavin Leonard John Chattic ("Gavin"), a minor, filed a claim with the Division of Administrative Hearings ("DOAH") for compensation under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (the "Plan"). Such Petition is fully incorporated herein by reference. Gavin was born on October 30, 2006, at Lakeland Regional Medical Center. Corey Leonard Chattic and Christine Lorraine Chattic, currently of 7415 Loblolly Avenue, Lakeland, Florida 33810, are the parents and natural guardians of the infant. Jennifer Mignon Nixon, M.D., whose address is 1733 Lakeland Hills Boulevard, Lakeland, Florida 33805, provided obstetrical services during the delivery of Gavin. Jennifer Mignon Nixon, M.D., is a participating physician as defined in Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. The Parties stipulate that the attached medical records from Lakeland Regional Medical Center are true and correct copies of the medical records kept in the normal course of business. The Parties stipulate that, at birth, the infant, Gavin, weighed 754 grams . . . . The medical records attached to the parties' Joint Stipulation of Facts reveal that Gavin was born premature, at 24 3/7 weeks' gestation, and that his birth weight was 754 grams.
Findings Of Fact Victoryia Williams was born on May 3, 2012, at North Shore Medical Center located in Miami, Florida. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Victoryia. In a report dated July 15, 2015, Dr. Willis described his findings in pertinent part as follows: Delivery was by spontaneous vaginal birth. Birth weight was 3,740 grams or 8 lbs 4 oz’s. Amniotic fluid was clear. The baby was not depressed at birth. Apgar scores were 9/9. The baby had a normal newborn hospital course. Admission physical exam in the nursery diagnosed “term newborn female.” Transition was stated to be “unremarkable.” The baby was out of the nursery and with the mother about 5 hours after birth. Records after hospital discharge indicate the child developed seizures at about 5 months of age. Genetic evaluation was done at about 14 months due to seizures and no genetic abnormalities were found. The baby was not dysmorphic. MRI at this time showed volume loss. In summary, prenatal course was uncomplicated. Labor was induced at 39 weeks. There was no fetal distress during labor. A variable FHR pattern developed just prior to delivery and would be considered fairly normal second stage of labor FHR pattern. This period of variable decelerations did not result in oxygen deprivation to the baby. The baby was delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery and was not depressed at birth. The newborn hospital course was uncomplicated. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery, or the immediate post delivery period. In an affidavit dated July 17, 2015, Dr. Willis confirmed his opinion as stated in his medical report and opined as follows: It is my opinion that the prenatal course was uncomplicated. Labor was induced at 39 weeks. There was no fetal distress during labor. A variable FHR pattern developed just prior to delivery and would be considered fairly normal second stage of labor FHR pattern. This period of variable decelerations did not result in oxygen deprivation to the baby. The baby was delivered by spontaneous vaginal delivery and was not depressed at birth. The newborn hospital course was uncomplicated. As such, it is my opinion that there was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. A review of the file in this case reveals that there have been no opinions filed that are contrary to the opinion of Dr. Willis that there was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby's brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited.
Findings Of Fact Jordan Ware was born on July 28, 2008, at Winnie Palmer Hospital in Orlando, Florida. Donald Willis, M.D. (Dr. Willis), was requested by NICA to review the medical records for Jordan. In a report dated December 14, 2015, Dr. Willis described his findings in pertinent part as follows: Cesarean section was uncomplicated. Amniotic fluid was clear. Birth weight was 2,914 grams or 6 lbs 7 oz’s. The baby was not depressed at birth. Apgar scores were normal at 9/9. Cord blood gas was normal with a pH of 7.25. * * * Seizures were diagnosed in 2003, at about 5 years of age. Neurology clinic at 6 years of age gives a history of seizures and developmental delay. EEG’s were either read as normal, or patterns consistent with heightened tendency for seizures. CT scan was done at one year of age for failure to thrive and was negative. MRI in 2014 identified mesial temporal sclerosis, which is a finding consistent with epilepsy. In summary, Cesarean section delivery was done at 36 weeks due to a non-reassuring FHR pattern and reduced amniotic fluid volume. The baby was not depressed at birth. Apgar scores were 9/9 and pH was normal at 7.25. The baby was described as a healthy newborn. The newborn hospital course was benign. There was no apparent obstetrical event that resulted in loss of oxygen or mechanical trauma to the baby’s brain during labor, delivery or the immediate post delivery period. A review of the file reveals that no contrary evidence was presented to dispute Dr. Willis’ finding that Jordan’s injuries were not the result of oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury during labor, delivery, or the immediate post-delivery period. Dr. Willis’ opinion is credited. The Petition was filed on November 3, 2015, which is more than five years after Jordan’s birth.
The Issue Whether Nathan Eric Powell has suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth- Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as alleged in the claim for compensation.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary matters Nathan Eric Powell (Nathan) is the natural son of Paulette Schwab-Powell and Norman Powell. He was born a live infant on September 23, 1993, at North Florida Regional Medical Center, a hospital located in Gainesville, Alachua County, Florida, and his birth weight was in excess of 2,500 grams. The physicians providing obstetrical services during the birth of Nathan were Eduardo Marichal, M.D. and Gregory Bailey, M.D. NICA concedes that Eduardo Marichal, M.D., was a participating physician in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. 2/ Nathan's birth and injury Paulette Schwab-Powell (Mrs. Powell) was admitted to North Florida Regional Medical Center at or about 6:30 p.m., September 22, 1993, in active labor. At the time, Mrs. Powell was slightly post-term, with an estimated date of delivery of September 11, 1993, and her prenatal course had been essentially uncomplicated. Mrs. Powell continued to have regular uterine contractions and at 10:25 p.m. her membranes were artificially ruptured, with clear fluid noted. Mrs. Powell continued progressing, and became completed dialated at 4:30 a.m., September 23, 1993. Thereafter, at or about 6:15 a.m. pushing was started, with assistance of a vacuum extractor. At 7:45 a.m., due to arrest of descent due to cephalopelvic disproportion, vacuum extraction was abandoned and the decision was made to proceed with a cesarean section. Mrs. Powell was taken to the operating room where a cesarean section was performed, and Nathan was delivered at 8:27 a.m. Upon delivery, Nathan required resuscitation, and his Apgar scores were 2 at one minute and 8 at five minutes. Within twenty-four hours of birth, Nathan developed intermittent tremors in the left leg, which were categorized as suspected seizures, and on September 24, 1993, he was transferred to the NICU II unit at Shands Teaching Hospital in Gainesville, Florida. Upon admission to Shands, Nathan evidenced a seizure and was placed on phenobarbital, later changed to Tegretol, to control his seizures. An EEG revealed seizures activity suggestive of diffuse cerebral dysfunction, and a CT scan revealed a bilateral subarachnoid hemorrhage, with fracture of the parietal bone. Nathan was initially hypertonic with poor suck, but showed gradual improvement until by September 28, 1993, he was able to take full feedings and was weaned off oxygen. On September 29, 1993, Nathan was discharged to the care of his parents, with maintenance Tegretol for seizure control. On November 24, 1993, Nathan was evaluated at the Pediatric Neurology Clinic. At the time, it was reported that Nathan continued on Tegretol and had not experienced any further seizures since those experienced immediately after his admission to Shands on September 24, 1993. A follow-up MRI was performed which showed resolving hemorrhage and no evidence of an ongoing fracture. On examination, Nathan evidenced good developmental milestones. The exam further revealed: . . . In terms of developmental milestones, Nathan has good head control for age. He has turned over one time. He recognizes mom's voice and smiles. On exam he has a height of 58.5 cm., weight of 5.48 kg., head circumference of 39.5 cm., temperature 37.2, pulse 164, respiratory rate of 28. On HEENT the patient's anterior fontanel is soft, flat, bilateral breath sounds are clear to auscultation. Heart rate is regular, no murmurs auscultated. Abdominal exam is benign for hepatosplenomegaly. No birth marks are detected. Specifically on neurologic the patient is awake, alert, easily rooting well. Cranial nerve exam reveals PERRLA, positive red reflex on funduscopic exam, tracking well. In terms of facial movement, there seems to be an asymmetry with a weekness on the left. It was difficult to assess forehead involvement as the baby neither cried nor smiled throughout the exam. It appears to effect [sic] his lower face as well as his left eyelid and mom adds that when he sleeps his left eye does not close spontaneously at times. Motor exam reveals normal tone. Reflexes were easy to elicit and approximately 5-10 beats of clonus was noted bilaterally with upgoing toes. Sensory is grossly intact. Cerebellar is appro- priate for age. As a consequence, it was concluded to continue Nathan on Tegretol, without further increase in dosage, and gradually wean him off the medicine as he gained weight, with the aim of discontinuing Tegretol by six months of age. On January 20, 1995, Nathan was evaluated by Michael Duchowny, M.D., at Miami Children's Hospital, in Miami, Dade County, Florida. Dr. Duchowny is board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology. On examination, Dr. Duchowny found and reported the following observations: GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT: Nathan rolled over at 5 months, sat at 7 months and stood at 9 months, he walked at a year and is not yet toilet trained. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: Reveals Nathan to be an alert, pleasant and cooperative infant. His weight is 24 lbs and height a 34 inches, his skin is warm and moist and no neurocutaneous stigmata, the head circumference measures 48.1 cm. which is in standard percentiles, neck is supple with out masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy and the cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are normal. There are no digital, skeletal or palmar abnormalities. Nathan's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION: Reveals him to be alert and cooperative, he maintains an age appropriate stream of attention and cooperative fully with the examination. He has a good level of curiosity. Nathan did not speak but babble quite melodically throughout the interview. Nathan maintain a good central gaze fixation and congenically follows quite well. There is blink to threat in both directions, the funduscopic examination are unremarkable the pubils [sic] are 4 ml and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. There are no nasolabial asymmetries and the tongue and palate move well, the gag reflex is appropriate active. Motor examination reveals generalized diminution in muscle tone. Motor examination reveals generalized diminution in muscle tone. This is present in a symmetric fashion in all extremities and there is increase range of motion at all joints. I detected no evidence . . . of spasticity or hypotonia and Nathan additionally demonstrate full use of all limbs. He grasp for offered objects with either hand and transferred readily. There is good fine motor movement and thumb finger opposition bilaterally. The deep tendon reflexes were slightly brisk being 2-3+ with both plantar responses being down ongoing. Station and gait revealed the stability in normal stands but a slight truncal ataxia while walking, however, Nathan turn crisply and did not fall. Sensory examination was deferred. Neurovascular examination reveal cervical cranial and ocular bruit and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Nathan neurological examination in detail reveals only mild delays in motor and speech function. I regard the lateralized motor syndrome to be fully resolved. The foregoing findings of Dr. Duchowny are consistent with the other evidence of record which reveals that the consequences of the injury Nathan suffered at birth have, over time, continued to improve. Consequently, the opinion of Dr. Duchowny that Nathan does not suffer a permanent and substantial physical impairment or a permanent and substantial mental impairment is credited.
