The Issue At issue is whether Maxwell Hubmann, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan (Plan).
Findings Of Fact Stipulated facts related to compensability Petitioners, Roger and Sara Hubmann, are the parents of Maxwell Hubmann, a minor. Maxwell was born a live infant on March 25, 2008, at Sacred Heart Hospital, a hospital located in Pensacola, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. Obstetrical services were delivered at Maxwell's birth by Brian Sontag, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by . . . mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. Here, the parties have stipulated, and the proof is otherwise compelling, that Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during the delivery process. (Transcript, pp. 9 and 10; Respondent's Exhibits 1-4). What remains to resolve is whether such injury rendered Maxwell permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. To address the nature and significance of Maxwell's injury, NICA offered the affidavit and report of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board-certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology, who evaluated Maxwell on January 28, 2009. Based on his evaluation, as well as his review of the medical records, Dr. Duchowny was of the opinion that while Maxwell suffered a traumatic brain injury during delivery, his mental function was normal and his motor deficit was quite mild. In so concluding, Dr. Duchowny documented the results of his examination, as well as his conclusions, as follows: PHYSICAL EXAMINATION today reveals an alert, well-developed and cooperative, well- nourished 10-month-old infant. Maxwell weighs 24 pounds and is 30 inches in height. The skin is warm and moist. There are no neurocutaneous stigmata. The hair is blond and of normal texture. The spine is straight without dysraphism. The head circumference measures 46.1 centimeters which is within standard percentiles. The anterior and posterior fontanels are patent and flat. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries. The tongue and palate are moist. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory, and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. Maxwell's NEUROLOGICAL EXAMINATION reveals him to be alert, cooperative and fully attentive. He is quite sociable and maintains an age appropriate stream of attention. He has good central gaze fixation with conjugate following movements. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. Funduscopic examination revealed no abnormal retinal findings. There are no significant facial asymmetries of movement. The uvula is midline and the pharyngeal folds are symmetric. Tongue movements are full in all planes. Motor examination reveals an asymmetry of movement with relatively greater movement on the right side. The left upper extremity has mild stiffness but has full range of motor. There is fine motor dexterity of both hands but Maxwell demonstrates a right arm preference and will preferentially reach for an object with the right hand. When an object is moved to the left, he will ultimately offer the left and readily transfers between hands. He has symmetrical movement of both legs. He has well-developed traction and grasp responses and good head control for age. The deep tendon reflexes are slightly exaggerated being 3+ at the knees and biceps. There are no pathologic reflexes. Plantar responses are downgoing. He can stand and bear weight with good axial tone and support does not take steps independently. He has good sitting balance as well. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. Neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Maxwell's neurological examination reveals that his motor developmental milestones are on time despite a very mild asymmetry of movement and muscle tone in the upper extremities. He is preferentially a right hander due to the motoric asymmetry. In other respects, Maxwell's neurologic status is quite good and his overall level of mental functioning appears to be on target at age level. I have had an opportunity to fully review the medical records which were mailed on January 12, 2009. The records indicate that Maxwell's neurologic problems at birth were the result of mechanical injury acquired during the delivery process. However, he has made remarkable progress and his mental function is normal and his motor deficit is quite mild . . . . (Respondent's Exhibits 3 and 4). Here, the opinions of Dr. Duchowny were logical, consistent with the record, not controverted, and not shown to lack credibility. Consequently, it must be resolved that Maxwell's brain injury did not render him permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired. See Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.").
The Issue At issue in this proceeding is whether Aubreigh Kathryne Delisle, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact As observed in the preliminary statement, neither Petitioners nor anyone on their behalf appeared at hearing, and no proof was offered to support their claim. Contrasted with the dearth of proof offered by Petitioners, Respondent offered the opinions of Michael Duchowny, M.D., a physician board certified in pediatrics, neurology with special competence in child neurology, and clinical neurophysiology. It was Dr. Duchowny's opinion, based on his neurological evaluation of Aubreigh on December 3, 1998 (at 7 years of age) and his review of Aubreigh's medical records, that Aubreigh's current neurological condition did not result from oxygen deprivation or mechanical trauma occurring during the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate post-delivery period. Rather, it was Dr. Duchowny's opinion that Aubreigh's neurological presentation was most consistent with "abnormal brain maturation" or, stated differently, "there was no brain damage whatsoever, but rather her brain was not developing normally." (Transcript, page 9.) Given the proof, it must be resolved that Petitioners have failed to demonstrate that Aubreigh suffered a "birth- related neurological injury" as alleged in the claim for benefits.
The Issue At issue is whether Chandler Jachimiak, a minor, qualifies for coverage under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.
Findings Of Fact Preliminary findings Charil Rodriguez is the natural mother and guardian of Chandler Jachimiak (Chandler), a minor. Chandler was born a live infant on May 26, 1999, at Baptist Hospital of Miami (Baptist Hospital), a hospital located in Miami, Florida, and his birth weight exceeded 2,500 grams. The physician providing obstetrical services at Chandler's birth was Pablo Delgado, M.D., who, at all times material hereto, was a "participating physician" in the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, as defined by Section 766.302(7), Florida Statutes. Coverage under the Plan Pertinent to this case, coverage is afforded by the Plan for infants who suffer a "birth-related neurological injury," defined as an "injury to the brain . . . caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital, which renders the infant permanently and substantially mentally and physically impaired." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. See also §§ 766.309 and 766.31, Fla. Stat. In this case, Petitioner is of the view that Chandler suffered a "birth-related neurological injury," as defined by the Plan. In contrast, NICA is of the view that Chandler did not suffer a "birth-related neurological injury" since the proof failed to support the conclusion that, more likely than not, Chandler's brain injury was "caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period in a hospital." § 766.302(2), Fla. Stat. Chandler's birth and postnatal course at Baptist Hospital The medical records related to Chandler's birth reveal that at or about 10:25 a.m., May 25, 1999, Ms. Rodriguez, with an estimated delivery date of May 22, 1999, and the fetus at 40+ weeks gestation, was admitted to Baptist Hospital, for induction of labor. At the time, Ms. Rodriguez's temperature was 98.5°F, her membranes were intact, and vaginal examination revealed the cervix at 1 centimeter dilation, effacement at 50 percent, and the fetus at station -3. Following admission, Petocin induction was started, but was discontinued at 9:30 p.m., to allow Ms. Rodriguez to rest overnight. Then, at 8:20 a.m., May 26, 1999, Ms. Rodriguez's membranes were artificially ruptured, with thick meconium noted, and at 8:30 a.m., Petocin induction resumed. Ms. Rodriguez's labor progressed slowly, with complete dilation noted at 8:40 p.m., and Chandler was delivered at 10:10 p.m. Of note, but for a slight increase in heart rate (tachycardia), continuous fetal monitoring was reassuring. Also of note, Ms. Rodriguez's temperature was 101.2°F, at 7:15 p.m., for which she received penicillin, and at delivery her temperature was 99.4°F. At delivery, Chandler was depressed, without respiratory effort and a heart rate in the 60-beat-per-minute range, and he was immediately suctioned, with no evidence of meconium below the cords; mask-bagged for a few seconds, without evidence of respiratory effort; and orally intubated without difficulty, and hand bagged with good response at about one minute. Notably, Chandler's arterial blood gases were within the normal range, and his Apgar scores were recorded as 4, 6, and 9, at one, five, and ten minutes, respectively.2 At 10:28 p.m., following stabilization, Chandler was transported to the special care nursery (SCN) for further observation and management. There, on admission, Chandler's temperature was 100.4°F, and physical examination noted mild respiratory distress, but was otherwise unrevealing. Admitting impressions were newborn depression, suspected meconium aspiration, suspected sepsis,3 and suspected pneumothorax (right). Plan included sepsis workup, antibiotics pending culture results, oxyhood 100 percent for nitrogen washout and chest x-ray. Chandler remained hospitalized until June 26, 1999, when he was discharged to his mother's care. In the interim, Chandler received respiratory support for 2-3 days; antibiotics for suspected sepsis; support due to poor feeding and failure to thrive; and Phenobartital for 10 days, following the onset of seizure activity. Notably, a head ultrasound at 8:33 p.m., May 27, 1999, about two hours after the onset of seizure activity, revealed the following: Bilateral lateral ventricles are small in size, but are felt to be within the normal range. There is no evidence of subependymal or intraventricular hemorrhage. The ventricles are normal in configuration. No periventricular leukomalacia is seen. There is no mass effect of midline shift. There is limited evaluation of the midline structures on this examination. The posterior fossa is intact. IMPRESSION: No evidence of intracranial hemorrhage. A follow-up CT of the brain on May 31, 1999, revealed: CT brain reveals diffuse lucency throughout the hemisphere bilaterally. The basoganglia and cerebellum are somewhat spared. The possibility that this [is] secondary to diffuse ischemic process is difficult to exclude. No evidence of hemorrhage is identified. There is soft tissue swelling over the left parietal and occipital scalp. IMPRESSION: Diffuse lucency throughout the white matter in the hemispheres, bilaterally, suggestive of a edema. This may be secondary to diffuse ischemia. Cerebellar hemispheres and basoganglia are somewhat spared. No evidence of hemorrhage is identified. Follow-up is suggested. And, a brain MRI on June 6, 1999, was read as follows: Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is compared with prior CT scan dated 05/31/99 Again noted is the presence of extensive abnormalities throughout the white matter in the supratentorial compartment. Now noted is prominent cortical sulci consistent with probable moderate volume loss which was not seen on the previous study. The sulci may have been effaced on the prior examination secondary to brain swelling. There is scalp soft tissue swelling in the right posterofrontal parietal convexity. There is no evidence of mass or hemorrhage. IMPRESSION: Extensive abnormalities throughout the supratentorium and white matter consistent with increased brain water without evidence of associated mass effect. Prominent cortical sulci are noted which may be secondary to loss of volume. There is no evidence of hemorrhage. Serial electroencephalograms (EEGs) on May 27, May 29, June 3, and June 8, 1999, were abnormal and consistent with a mild diffuse encephalopathy and a lowered seizure threshold. Chandler's subsequent development The medical records related to Chandler's subsequent development reflect that on August 6, 1999, Chandler presented at Miami Children's Hospital for a follow-up neurology examination. At the time, a CT scan of the brain revealed "extensive bilateral cerebral encephalomalacia with associated brain atrophy," and "bilateral chronic subdural hematomas, more pronounced on the left." Chandler was admitted for further evaluation, and a brain MRI of August 12, 1999, revealed: There are bilateral chronic subdural hematomas with the left much larger than the right. The left subdural collection extends into the interhemispheric fissure. The findings could be consistent with nonaccidental trauma, and clinical correlation is needed in this regard. There is bilateral cerebral atrophy and multifocal cystic encephalomalacia. There is mass effect upon the left cerebral hemisphere, related to the subdural collection but there is no midline shift. There is generalized ventriculomegaly that appears predominantly related to central atrophy. Chandler was discharged by Miami Children's Hospital on August 30, 1999. Chandler's hospital course was briefly described in his discharge summary, as follows: HOSPITAL COURSE: An ENT consult was placed. A bone survey was shown to be normal. Because of the persistent inspiratory and expiratory stridor, bronchoscopy was done by Pulmonary which showed a laryngomalacia. Tracheostomy tube was placed and the patient was transferred to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for observation. Post operation day #6, the patient was transferred back from Pediatric Intensive Care Unit to 3 South. A chest xray done on 8/25 showed no significant change in the lung fields as compared to previous xray The patient was also followed by Neurology. The magnetic resonance scan done on 8/12 showed a mass effect of the left cerebral hemisphere with mucocystic encephalomalacia or chronic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurology's plan was to repeat CT prior to discharge home . . . . CT scan was done on 8/29/99 which was read as brain atrophy encephalomalacia with decrease in subdural hematoma. As compared to previous film, there was no brain edema . . . . On April 21, 2004, following the filing of the claim in this case, Chandler was examined by Michael Duchowny, M.D., a pediatric neurologist associated with Miami Children's Hospital. Dr. Duchowny reported the results of his neurology evaluation, as follows: I evaluated Chandler Jachimiak on April 21, 2004. The evaluation was conducted in my office at Miami Children's Hospital with history provided by Chandler's mother.[4] History according to Ms. Jachimiak. The mother began by explaining that Chandler "was in the birth canal too long" when he was born and "had a lack oxygen in his blood." He was delivered at term at Baptist Hospital and remained in the newborn nursery for approximately one month due to poor feeding and failure to thrive. He was discharged in stable condition, but was admitted to Miami Children's Hospital three weeks later when a CT scan of the brain revealed a fluid collection over the convexities. The purpose of admission was to rule out possible child abuse, but Chandler ultimately remained hospitalized for approximately six weeks because of chronic feeding and breathing difficulties. He eventually had a tracheostomy, gastrostomy and Nissan fundoplication performed. The tracheostomy and g-tube were both removed last summer. Apparently, a diagnosis of Pierre-Robin Syndrome was entertained, but was never formally diagnosed. Chandler's growth and development have subsequently been quite slow. He has been followed by Dr. Oscar Papazian and was initially diagnosed with cerebral palsy and spasticity. He received Botox injections to the lower extremities until two years ago. His mother now feels that "he doesn't need it." Chandler is still not speaking. He has no verbal communication. He receives physical, speech and occupational therapy at the Neva King Cooper School. Chandler's social skills and behavior is another area of difficulty. He does not play well with other children and tends to be a loner. He likes playing with his toys. He is easily frustrated and will bite himself or other children. He tends to be "in his own little world" and his mother has noted poor eye contact. He frequently claps his hands repetitively and enjoys listening to music. Chandler's health is otherwise good. He has never had seizures and is on no intercurrent medications. He is scheduled for strabismus surgery in early May. His vision is otherwise intact. His hearing has been screened and is normal. Chandler sleeps through the night and his appetite has been stable, although he continues to be slow to gain weight. * * * FAMILY HISTORY: Chandler's father is absent from the family. His mother is 33 and is healthy. Multiple maternal brothers have learning disabilities and a maternal grandmother suffers from migraines. An 8- year-old sister is healthy. There are no family members with degenerative illnesses, mental retardation, epilepsy or cerebral palsy. PHYSICAL EXAMINATION reveals a small, but appropriately proportioned 4-year-old boy. The skin is warm and moist without cutaneous stigmata. The hair is brown and of normal texture. His weight is 32 pounds and his height is 40 inches. Head circumference measures 44.1 cm, which is well below the second percentile for age. There are no cranial or facial anomalies or asymmetries and the fontanels are closed. The neck is supple without masses, thyromegaly or adenopathy. The cardiovascular, respiratory and abdominal examinations are unremarkable. The healed tracheostomy and gastrostomy sights are noted. Peripheral pulses are 2+ and symmetric. NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION was difficult to complete because of oppositional and defiant behavior. Chandler was restrained by his mother and intermittently sucked on his left thumb. Frequent tongue protrusions were noted and he drooled intermittently. He did not speak in words at any time during the examination. He could not name body parts or colors. He could not follow simple commands. He frequently waved his hands and clapped them. The two upper incisors are absent due to trauma. Cranial nerve examination reveals bilateral blink to threat. A funduscopic examination could not be performed. The pupils are 3 mm and react briskly to direct and consensually presented light. The extraocular movements demonstrate alternating exotropia. There are no facial asymmetries. The tongue movements are poorly coordinated. The uvula is midline. Motor examination reveals a generalized static hypotonia with a dynamic increase in tone. There is full range of motion in all joints. There are no adventitious movements and no focal weakness or atrophy. The deep tendon reflexes are slightly brisk and 2+ to 3+ bilaterally, but plantar responses are downgoing. Sensory examination is intact to withdrawal of all extremities to stimulation. Coordination could not be performed. The neurovascular examination reveals no cervical, cranial or ocular bruits and no temperature or pulse asymmetries. In SUMMARY, Chandler's neurologic examination does not reveal focal or lateralizing features, but does demonstrate significant delays in multiple domains consistent with a pervasive developmental disorder. He is clearly behind with regard to his receptive and expressive language development, but also has short attention span, high activity level, immature social skills with poor eye contact and a behavior disorder. He is also microcephalic and has short stature. I believe that Chandler is at significant risk for fitting within the low functioning autistic spectrum. I have not yet received medical records regarding Chandler's background and will issue a final report once the records have been received and reviewed. The cause and timing of Chandler's brain injury Dr. Duchowny ultimately reviewed Chandler's medical records and, as revealed by his deposition (Respondent's Exhibit 4), was of the opinion, based on that review and his neurologic evaluation, that the most likely cause of Chandler's brain injury was an infection, and that such injury occurred prior the onset of labor, as opposed to having been caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery or resuscitation. Notably, the opinions of Dr. Duchowny are consistent with the record and otherwise uncontroverted. Consequently, it must be resolved that Chandler's brain injury was not caused by oxygen deprivation or mechanical injury occurring in the course of labor, delivery, or resuscitation in the immediate postdelivery period, as required for coverage under the Plan. . See Wausau Insurance Company v. Tillman, 765 So. 2d 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)("Because the medical conditions which the claimant alleged had resulted from the workplace incident were not readily observable, he was obliged to present expert medical evidence establishing that causal connection."); Ackley v. General Parcel Service, 646 So. 2d 242 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)(determining cause of psychiatric illness is essentially a medical question, requiring expert medical evidence); Thomas v. Salvation Army, 562 So. 2d 746, 749 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)("In evaluating medical evidence, a judge of compensation claims may not reject uncontroverted medical testimony without a reasonable explanation.").
