Military Judge: Ryan Hendricks., For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel R. Davis Younts, USAF., For Appellee: None.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
Considering these facts in light of all the circum-, stances of the case, including the PTA and the sentence adjudged, we are con-, vinced there is no colorable showing of possible prejudice from the SJAR error.
Military Judge: Ryan Hendricks. DISCUSSION, Whether a motion is waived by the waive all waivable motions provision, in the PTA or by Appellants unconditional guilty plea, this court is not pre-, cluded from determining whether Appellant is due relief for a multiplicious, specification.
Military Judge: L. Martin Powell. Mary Ellen, Payne, Esquire. While the PDS admitted, at trial reflects Appellants updated basic pay and [Air Force] Good Conduct Medal, we, find no colorable showing of possible prejudice due to the errors in the PDS attached, to the SJAR.
, We are convinced the military judge in Appellants case determined that, Appellant was guilty of Specification 5 of Charge II, not as it was originally, charged, but as Appellant pleaded and as it was amended pursuant to the PTA., Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Mary Ellen, Payne, Esquire.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred. See Rule for, Courts-Martial (R.C.M. United States v. Books, No., ACM S32369, 2017 CCA LEXIS 226 at *7 (A.F.
UNITED STATES, Appellee, v., Dwayne J.C. Sentence adjudged 30 November 2017 by SpCM con-, vened at Hill Air Force Base, Utah., For Appellant: Captain Mark J. Schwartz, USAF., For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire., Before HARDING, SPERANZA, and HUYGEN Appellate Military, Judges.
Military Judge: John Harwood (motion); Major Todd, M. Swensen, USAF., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE, C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS, ________________________ UNITED STATES, Appellee, v., Javaris E. FORD, Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant, ________________________ , Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months
Shelly W. Schools (arraignment and trial)., For Appellant: Major Meghan R. Glines-Barney, USAF.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred. See Rule for, Courts-Martial (R.C.M.
Military Judge: Andrew Kalavanos. Sentence adjudged 16 October 2017 by SpCM con-, vened at Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia., For Appellant: Major Todd M. Swensen, USAF; Major Christopher C., Newton, USAF., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen, Payne, Esquire.
Sentence adjudged 24 August 2017 by, SpCM convened at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona., For Appellant: Major Kirk W. Albertson, USAF;PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M. A correct statement of, the law in a clemency submission also evidences trial defense, counsels understanding of Article 60, UCMJ, and thus compe-, tency to advise clients during post-trial processing. United States v. Aiken, No. ACM 39288, 2018 CCA LEXIS, 366 (A.F.
Military Judge: Jefferson B. Brown., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen, Payne, Esquire.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
Military Judge: Tiffany J. Williams. Upon our review, we noted the trial counsel argued for, the, military judge adjudged, the staff judge advocate recommended, and the con-, vening authority approved forfeiture of two-thirds pay per month for three, months.1 Article 19, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 819.
Military Judge: John C. Degnan., For Appellant: Captain Meghan Glines-Barney, USAF., For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
Military Judge: Brian D. Teter., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF; Mary Ellen, Payne, Esquire.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
Military Judge: Andrew Kalavanos., For Appellant: Major Allen S. Abrams, USAF., For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire.PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no, error materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred.
Military Judge: John C. Harwood.forfeiture of $1, 066.00 pay per month for 5 months, and reduction to E-, 1. Sentence adjudged 1 June 2017 by SpCM convened at Ramstein Air, Base, Germany., For Appellant: Captain Mark J. Schwartz, USAF., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF.
Military Judge: Lyndell M. Powell. Sentence adjudged 12 July 2017 by SpCM con-, vened at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada., For Appellant: Captain Meghan Glines-Barney, USAF., For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire. Arti-, cles 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).
