APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Richard P. Rector, Esq., Dawn E. Stem, Esq. The government does not object. See TTF, L.L.C.ASBCA No. 58494, 13 BCA, 35, 343 at 173, 464.LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Paul R. Hahn, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: William E. Brazis, Jr., Esq., DISA General Counsel, Colleen M. Eagan, Esq.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Scott R. Williamson, Esq. See, TTF, L.L.C.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61865, Appeal ofKnowlogy, Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Appeals of ), ), Saban Aerospace, Inc. ) ASBCA Nos., Emily A. Unnasch, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Maria L. Panichelli, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61815, Appeal of Comp, Environmental, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Appeals of ), ), The Boeing Company ) ASBCA Nos.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq., DCMA Chief Trial Attorney, St~phen M. Wilson, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos.
See Cessna, 126 F.3d at 1451.dealing with enforcement of labor standards, in particular payroll reviews. I conclude that, proof of such direct and predictable harm to a contractor is prima facie evidence that a, regulation, in this case FAR 22.406-1, exists for the benefit of the contractor.
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Damien C. Specht, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61748, Appeal of Pioneer Aerospace, Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
If the CO fails to comply, with this order, such failure will be deemed a decision by the CO denying the claim, and, the contractor may appeal to this Board or sue in the United States Court of Federal, Claims pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7I03(f)(5) and 7104.
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61740, Appeal of, ManTechAdvanced Systems International, Inc., rendered in conformance with the, Board's Charter.
Gregory S. Jacobs, Esq.Erin L. Felix, Esq.l I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61735, Appeal of DynCorp, II, International LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Carl J. Nichols, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61729, Appeal of United, Launch Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Board Rule l(a)(5) implements this, section providing that [i]n lieu of filing a notice of appeal under paragraph (a)(l) or, (a)(2) of this Rule, the contractor may petition the Board to direct the contracting, officer to issue a decision in a specified period of time as determined by the Board.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Robert J. Roux, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61720, Appeal of Louisiana, Workforce Commission, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61719, Appeal of Panjshir Star, Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Phyllis E. Andes, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61684-986, Petition of Maruf Sharif, Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61676, Appeal of Green Life, Environmental, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
Sea Cycle Construction Company (appellant) appeals from a contracting, officer's final decision denying its claim for payment under a contract for construction, work in Afghanistan. Appellant timely filed its notice of appeal, with the Board by email dated June 27, 2018.
As explained in our decision dismissing this appeal, if a contractor seeks more, than $100, 000 in a claim to the government, it must certify that claim using language, that comports with the requirements of the Contract Disputes Act in 41 U.S.C. § 7103(b).incorporating the Disputes clause).
