Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
In Re Hertzel, BAP No. 04-8083, Bankruptcy No. 03-63933, Adversary No. 03-6135 (2005)

329 B.R. 221 (2005), In re Lisa Marie HERTZEL, Debtor., Lisa Marie Hertzel, Plaintiff-Appellee v., Educational Credit Management Corporation, Defendant-Appellant., BAP No. 04-8083, Bankruptcy No. 03-63933, Adversary No. 03-6135., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit.

# 1
In Re Van Aken, BAP No. 04-8037 (2005)

Mellon Bank, N.A. Sorah, 163 F.3d at 401. Generally, the contempt power of a court is available to enforce obligations of support, not division of property. The state entries of judgment make no distinction between the Installment Payments and the other provisions of spousal support;

# 2
In Re Green Valentine, Inc., 05-8010, No. 01-34950 (2005)

330 B.R. 880 (2005), In re Green Valentine, Inc.;, Wilson, v., Chamness., No. 05-8010, No. 01-34950., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., September 8, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 3
In Re Bonner, 04-8101, No. 04-13926 (2005)

330 B.R. 880 (2005), In re Bonner;, Bonner, v., Sicherman., No. 04-8101, No. 04-13926., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., September 6, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Reversed.

# 4
In Re Harman, 04-8085 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), IN RE HARMAN HARMAN, v., DAVILLA, No. 04-8085., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., July 12, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 5
In Re Erin Farms, Inc., 04-8072, 04-8095, 04-8096, 03-63627 (2005)

336 B.R. 600 (2005), IN RE ERIN FARMS, INC.;, TIMMONS, v., DEERE CREDIT, INC., No. 04-8072, 04-8095, 04-8096, 03-63627, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit, December 7, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 6
In Re Scheiderer, 04-8066 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), IN RE SCHEIDERER SCHEIDERER, v., PRODUCERS CREDIT CORP., No. 04-8066., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., May 19, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 7
In Re Gasel Transp. Lines, Inc., 04-8062 (2005)

, 851 F.2d at 162.[11], Volvo's subsequent application for an administrative expense claim sought additional adequate protection, of approximately $66, 000, for the period between the filing of the Debtor's chapter 11 case and commencement of adequate protection payments under the Agreed Order.

# 8
In Re Haven, Inc., 04-8058 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), IN RE HAVEN, INC. PORTER DRYWALL CO. INC., v., HAVEN, INC., No. 04-8058., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., April 7, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Reversed.

# 9
O'Donnell v. O'Donnell, 04-8054, No. 04-8056 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), NORMALI O'DONNELL v., O'DONNELL, No. 04-8054, No. 04-8056., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., May 19, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 10
In Re Girton, Oakes & Burger, Inc., 04-8052 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), IN RE GIRTON, OAKES BURGER, INC. PNH, INC., v., SAYAVICH, No. 04-8052., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., June 22, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Reversed.

# 11
In Re Cohara, 04-8051 (2005)

Bartee, 317 B.R. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth *29 Circuit affirmed the decision of the bankruptcy court, stating:, Dismissal of debtors' case would have prejudiced their creditors, because there is no guarantee that debtors will pay their debts outside of bankruptcy.

# 12
In Re Congrove, 04-8049, No. 01-59398 (2005)

330 B.R. 880 (2005), In re Congrove;, Congrove, v., McDonald's Corp., No. 04-8049, No. 01-59398., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., August 31, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed in part, Reversed in part, and Remanded.

# 13
In Re Quaker City Castings, Inc., 04-8045, 03-41848 (2005)

337 B.R. 729 (2005), IN RE QUAKER CITY CASTINGS, INC., SUGARLOAF INDUS. AND MARKETING CO., LLC, v., QUAKER CITY CASTINGS, INC., No. 04-8045, 03-41848., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., November 18, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed; Appeal Dismissed.

# 14
In Re Amro, 04-8043 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), IN RE AMRO ALLIED BUSINESS BROKERS, INC., v., AMRO, No. 04-8043., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., June 22, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 15
In Re Whitaker, 04-8042 (2005)

326 B.R. 901 (2005), IN RE WHITAKER WHITAKER, v., WHITACRE, No. 04-8042., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., June 3, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 16
In Re Fields, 04-8031 (2005)

Cheesman v. Tenn. In re Miller, 377 F.3d at 622. Bankruptcy courts may discharge the portion of student loan debt for which payment would impose an undue hardship on the debtor, emphasizing that the requirement of undue hardship must always apply to the discharge of student loans in bankruptcy.

# 17
In Re Cluxton, 04-8028 (2005)

, In this case, the bankruptcy court denied confirmation of the Debtor's chapter 13 plan. Moreover, Ohio courts have held that a failure to precisely follow the statute by a county auditor does not negate the mobile home becoming part of the real property by operation of law.

# 18
In Re Nowak, 03-8051, No. 01-50913 (2005)

330 B.R. 880 (2005), In re Nowak;, Spragin, v., Nowak., No. 03-8051, No. 01-50913., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., September 16, 2005., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

# 19

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer