In the first proceeding, the, 3 bankruptcy court found appellant, Darryl Parker (Mr. Parker), in, 4 contempt for violating the § 5241 discharge injunction and, 5 awarded sanctions to appellee-debtor, Jessica Arlene Nelson, 6 (Debtor), consisting of $2, 048.45 in attorneys fees and costs.
In the first proceeding, the, 3 bankruptcy court found appellant, Darryl Parker (Mr. Parker), in, 4 contempt for violating the § 5241 discharge injunction and, 5 awarded sanctions to appellee-debtor, Jessica Arlene Nelson, 6 (Debtor), consisting of $2, 048.45 in attorneys fees and costs.
i.e., factor one. i.e., they filed, 22 three Form B22cs all of which were false, seven sets of, 23 Schedule I and Js all of which falsely stated income and, 24 expenses, and six plans, only one of which was confirmed due to, 25 the courts reliance on Debtors false testimony and Form B22c.
i.e., factor one. i.e., they filed, 22 three Form B22cs all of which were false, seven sets of, 23 Schedule I and Js all of which falsely stated income and, 24 expenses, and six plans, only one of which was confirmed due to, 25 the courts reliance on Debtors false testimony and Form B22c.
, 19 The state court, at summary judgment, found that Debtor, 20 admitted in [a] hearing that he personally received millions, 21 of dollars from Banana when Banana made nothing and that his, 22 behavior amounted to a deliberate looting or waste of funds, 23 invested by [] Arnold in Banana.
, 19 The state court, at summary judgment, found that Debtor, 20 admitted in [a] hearing that he personally received millions, 21 of dollars from Banana when Banana made nothing and that his, 22 behavior amounted to a deliberate looting or waste of funds, 23 invested by [] Arnold in Banana.
BAP Rule 8024-1. The United States Trustee argued, 5 that Renewable Energys lack of such insurance exposed its, 6 bankruptcy estate to an unacceptable risk of postpetition liquor-, 7 related liability and hence constituted cause for dismissal or, 8 conversion under § 1112(b).
BAP Rule 8024-1. The United States Trustee argued, 5 that Renewable Energys lack of such insurance exposed its, 6 bankruptcy estate to an unacceptable risk of postpetition liquor-, 7 related liability and hence constituted cause for dismissal or, 8 conversion under § 1112(b).
JACK CULLEN;, 19 After considering the parties positions, the bankruptcy, 20 court ruled that the automatic stay prevented the state court and, 21 Yellow Express from continuing with contempt proceedings based on, 22 Dingleys failure to pay the $4, 000 prepetition discovery, 23 sanctions award.
JACK CULLEN;, 19 After considering the parties positions, the bankruptcy, 20 court ruled that the automatic stay prevented the state court and, 21 Yellow Express from continuing with contempt proceedings based on, 22 Dingleys failure to pay the $4, 000 prepetition discovery, 23 sanctions award.
FILED, MAR 15 2016, SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK, 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL, OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2, 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL, 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 5 In re: ) BAP No. WW-14-1424-KiFJu, ), 6 JEFFREY LLOYD WICKLUND, ) Bk. No. 14-11419-KAO, ), 7 Debtor. ), ), 8 )
FILED, MAR 15 2016, SUSAN M. SPRAUL, CLERK, 1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION U.S. BKCY. APP. PANEL, OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 2, 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL, 4 OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT, 5 In re: ) BAP No. WW-14-1424-KiFJu, ), 6 JEFFREY LLOYD WICKLUND, ) Bk. No. 14-11419-KAO, ), 7 Debtor. ), ), 8 )
He contended that the United States of America is the, 28 principal liable for payment on the Promissory Note., 10 STANDARD OF REVIEW, 11 We review the bankruptcy courts dismissal of a chapter 13, 12 bankruptcy case under any of the enumerated paragraphs of, 13 § 1307(c) for abuse of discretion.
He contended that the United States of America is the, 28 principal liable for payment on the Promissory Note., 10 STANDARD OF REVIEW, 11 We review the bankruptcy courts dismissal of a chapter 13, 12 bankruptcy case under any of the enumerated paragraphs of, 13 § 1307(c) for abuse of discretion.
(citing In re Mickey Thompson, 16 Entmt Grp., 19 Appellants argue, in summary, that Ms. McGees probability, 20 of success in the Arizona family court litigation is low, because, 21 (1) it was improper for Ms. McGee to have brought the action in, 22 family court, rather than civil court;
(citing In re Mickey Thompson, 16 Entmt Grp., 19 Appellants argue, in summary, that Ms. McGees probability, 20 of success in the Arizona family court litigation is low, because, 21 (1) it was improper for Ms. McGee to have brought the action in, 22 family court, rather than civil court;
determined by this court. This, 16 was inconsistent with Ninth Circuit case law that laches and the, 17 passage of time cannot serve as a basis to deny a motion to, 18 reopen. The bankruptcy court may consider the defense of laches, (and all other substantive issues) after reopening the, 18 case.
determined by this court. This, 16 was inconsistent with Ninth Circuit case law that laches and the, 17 passage of time cannot serve as a basis to deny a motion to, 18 reopen. The bankruptcy court may consider the defense of laches, (and all other substantive issues) after reopening the, 18 case.
Debtor unsuccessfully appealed from the, 11 confirmation order; After a hearing, which Debtor did not, 3 attend, and Debtors filing of a financial management course, 4 certification, the bankruptcy court entered an order granting, 5 Debtors discharge under § 1141(d) and, again, closing her case.
Debtor unsuccessfully appealed from the, 11 confirmation order; After a hearing, which Debtor did not, 3 attend, and Debtors filing of a financial management course, 4 certification, the bankruptcy court entered an order granting, 5 Debtors discharge under § 1141(d) and, again, closing her case.
