The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More500 F.2d 113, John T. ROHE, Petitioner-Appellant, v.Robert T. FROEHLKE, Secretary of the Army, and CommandingGeneral, First United States Army, Respondent-Appellee., United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. On January 15, 1972, the unit commander replied to these requests. Appeal board.
489 F.2d 769, 85 L.R.R.M. 2001, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1123 (1967), the Court held that the union did not commit an unfair labor practice in fining its members who violated a union rule by working during an authorized strike, and seeking court enforcement of the fine. 412 U.S. 84, 93 S. Ct.
We therefore look on the injury to plaintiffs as perhaps irreparable but not of great magnitude. All we now say is that we lack appellate jurisdiction over plaintiffs' appeal from the court's denial of their request for a temporary restraining order enjoining the three flights.
498 F.2d 1400, 87 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3275, N.L.R.B.v.First National Bank of New Smyrna Beach, 74-2416, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit, 8/16/74, 1, N.L.R.B., Fla., 2, PETITION DENIED***, ***, Opinion contains citation(s) or special notations
506 F.2d 1051, First National Bank of Minneapolisv.Order of Saint Paul, First Hermit--The Pauline Fathers, 74-1442, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit, 12/13/74, 1, E.D.Pa., AFFIRMED
508 F.2d 834, N. L. R. B.v.Union De Trabajadores De La Industria Gastronomica De PuertoRico, Local 610, of Hotel and Restaurant Employeesand Bartenders International Union, AFL-CIO, 74-1395, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/6/74, 1, N.L.R.B., ENFORCEMENT
515 F.2d 502, Ploufv.Connors, 74-1393, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 11/10/74, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
511 F.2d 471, In re Lionel MINTZER, Appellant., No. 74--1388., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., Argued Dec. 4, 1974.Decided Dec. 26, 1974., Henry D. Katz, Boston, Mass., with whom Joseph J. Balliro, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellant., George F. Kelly, Sp. Atty.
507 F.2d 195, In re John E. DUNN, Appellant. We believe that the affidavit provided a sufficient factual statement to enable the court to find, as it did, that normal investigative procedures reasonably appeared unlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous.
505 F.2d 1250, In re Rudolph William STUCKENBERG, Jerome W. SIDEL, Trusteein Bankruptcy, Appellant, v.FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS LOAN ASSOCIATION OF NORMANDY, Appellee., United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. The District Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, reported at 374 F. Supp.
508 F.2d 834, N. L. R. B.v.Biy Y Supermarkets, Inc., 74-1351, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 11/5/74, 1, N.L.R.B., ENFORCEMENT
508 F.2d 834, Sykesv.Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, 74-1342, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/12/74, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
508 F.2d 834, N. L. R. B.v.Frank v. L. McKinney, Inc. 74-1341, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 10/30/74, 1, N.L.R.B., ENFORCEMENT
The Moderator in charge of the election had a standing rule that candidates must stay beyond the door of the polling place, except when voting, but there was a further exception, and the cause of this dispute: the Ward Clerk is expected to work inside the polling place, even if a candidate.
504 F.2d 826, Harry GIBSON et al., LIVELY, Circuit Judge. Whether the complaint states a cause of action on which relief could be granted is a question of law and just as issues of fact it must be decided after and not before the court has assumed jurisdiction over the controversy.
508 F.2d 834, N. L. R. B.v.Union de Periodistas, 74-1321, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 10/11/74, 1, N.L.R.B., ENFORCED
In past years appellee, along with other New England apple growers, has sumbitted to the state employment service clearance orders requesting apple pickers, and, after hiring the few workers locally available, has obtained the requisite certification for the admission of alien workers.
508 F.2d 834, Baconv.Fuller, 74-1314, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/26/74, 1, D.N.H., AFFIRMED
507 F.2d 467, MERRILL TRUST COMPANY, Executor of the Estates of Dean W.Footman and Priscilla L. Footman, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.Merrill BRADFORD, Executor of the Estates of Charles D.Meyer and Sandra W. Meyer, Defendant-Appellee. 67, 74 L. Ed. 643; at 469.6 Yachting is not a commercial venture.
506 F.2d 1238, Michael SPARKS et al., 4, Our hope is that by setting forth what we regard as examples of complaints that must be resolved within the prison system, we will discourage similar suits and enable the courts to focus on serious and important claims of prisoners.
