The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
MorePetitioner is one of a number of defendants in a suit alleging misuse of union welfare funds., 4, The opinion and order from which petitioner here seeks to appeal is interlocutory, and would normally be appealable only upon the final disposition of the case upon the merits by the district court.
511 F.2d 1100, David L. STROUD, Petitioner, v.Frank A. HALL et al., 2, The starting point for our inquiry is the 14-page Findings of Fact and Rulings on Defendant's Motions to Suppress filed by the state court trial judge and based upon a hearing he conducted on the motions., 4, Certificate denied.
522 F.2d 1278, *dDraganescuv.First National Bank of Hollywood, 75-2922, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit, 10/21/75, 1, S.D.Fla., AFFIRMED, *, Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N
520 F.2d 941, *dFirst State Bank, Clutev.Smith, 75-2154, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit, 9/22/75, 1, S.D.Tex., AFFIRMED, *, Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N
525 F.2d 691, *dFirst Federal Savings and LoanAssociation of Charlotte County, Floridav.U. S., 75-2054, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Fifth Circuit, 12/18/75, 1, M.D.Fla., AFFIRMED, *, Summary Calendar case; Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of N
515 F.2d 1216, SOUTHERN ELECTRIC STEEL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BIRMINGHAM, Defendant-Appellee.*, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. See McDaniel v. Painter, 10 Cir. Bell v. Hood, 1946, 327 U.S. 678, 66 S. Ct. 773, 90 L. Ed. 939;
FFA sued for commissions earned as sales representative, for damages resulting from an alleged breach of contract, trade libel and inducement to breach of contract by Pro Golf. In 1961 Robert G. Wynn (Wynn) became the Far East sales representative for FIRST FLIGHT golf clubs and balls. Code Ann.
527 F.2d 643, Quinn, In Re, 75-1467, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/30/75, 1, D.N.H., AFFIRMED
527 F.2d 643, 7 Envtl. L. Rep. 20, 050, City of Bostonv.Coleman, 75-1419, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/22/75, D.Mass., 397 F. Supp. 698, DISMISSED AND REMANDED
527 F.2d 643, Appeal of Massachusetts Port Authority, 75-1418, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/22/75, D.Mass., 397 F. Supp. 698, DISMISSED AND REMANDED
527 F.2d 643, Lai Siu Kuenv.Immigration and Naturalization Service, 75-1402, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/8/75, 1, I.N.S., DISMISSED
, ALDRICH, Senior Circuit Judge., 4, Emhart's business is also diversified. During final arguments below, immediately before it announced its opinion, the court expressly referred to the limitations the Supreme Court had placed upon USM's domestic shoe machinery activities. 150, 42 L. Ed. 2d 123.
527 F.2d 643, Bradleyv.Food and Drug Administration, 75-1367, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/5/75, 1, F.D.A., DISMISSED
William J. Deachman, United States Attorney for the District of New Hampshire, stated that he was familiar with both the investigation into the purchase of a substantial number of firearms by Quinn and the proposed lines of inquiry by the grand jury. 2357, 33 L. Ed. 2d 179 (1972).
527 F.2d 643, Spencer Companies, Inc.v.Sternback, 75-1358, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/15/75, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
527 F.2d 643, Weiss-Lawrence, Inc.v.James Talcott, Inc., 75-1351, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/10/75, D.N.H., 399 F. Supp. 84, AFFIRMED AND REMANDED
527 F.2d 643, New Hampshire Sign Association, Inc.v.City of Concord, 75-1349, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/2/75, 1, D.N.H., AFFIRMED
527 F.2d 643, Conklinv.Helgemoe, 75-1345, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/19/75, 1, D.N.H., AFFIRMED
521 F.2d 1397, Cainv.State of Florida, 75-1328, 75-1329, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 8/29/75, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
The statute applies by its terms only to boats 'operating from any locality in the state of Rhode Island.' Appellants claim that this language limits application of the regulation to Rhode Island boats; 289, 42 L. Ed. 2d 249 (1974), and MTM, Inc. v. Baxley, 420 U.S. 799, 95 S. Ct.
