The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More855 F.2d 1, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v.Dale Scott HUNNEWELL, Defendant, Appellant. Because of the compelling interest in prompt trials, the Court has interpreted the requirements of the collateral-order exception to the final judgment rule with the utmost strictness in criminal cases.
, A. Reasonable Cause, 16, The district court did not specifically determine whether there was reasonable cause to believe that Tomco violated the Act.3 Instead the court assumed the truth of the allegations contained in the Board's petition for interim injunctive relief under section 10(j).
YOUNG, Warden;, ORDER, 1, This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit., 2, This pro se federal prisoner appeals the judgment in favor of defendants in his civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.
862 F.2d 307, Ellovich (Joseph E.)v.First Fidelity Bank, N.A., New Jersey, North Jersey DistrictWater Supply Commission, NO. 88-5412, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., OCT 17, 1988, Appeal From: D.N.J. Sarokin, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
at 627 (permanently attached indorsements to instrument travel with it wherever it might go)., The district court concluded that, although the notes bear the legend Pay to the order of EMPIRE OF AMERICA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK (Empire North), Putnam intended to indorse the notes to Empire South.
, ORDER, 1, The debtors move for permission to file briefs from their state court attorneys on appeal from the district court's order affirming the decision of the bankruptcy court in this Chapter 11 case.
, Before DONALD RUSSELL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge., PER CURIAM:, 1, Plaintiff bank appeals from a judgment of the district court affirming the judgment of the bankruptcy court which held that defendant Mullins had no intent to defraud the plaintiff.
That refund suit had consisted of claims for refunds for the years 1967 through 1974, resulting from net operating losses incurred in the years 1975 and 1976, which under applicable law could be carried back to the years 1967 through 1974. The district court erred in transferring the action.
861 F.2d 1278, Mirannev.First Financial Bank*, NO. 88-3489, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., NOV 17, 1988, Appeal From: E.D.La., 87 B.R. 897, 1, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2
852 F.2d 805, 12 Fed., 2, After reviewing the pertinent authorities in this area, we are persuaded that the district court retained jurisdiction to grant appellant's request for a stay despite the fact that a notice of appeal to this Court was filed prior to the request for a stay. Fed.R.App.P.
, PER CURIAM:, 1, Calvin Bernie Smith appeals from the district court's affirmance of the bankruptcy court's dismissal of Smith's Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. On August 18, 1987, Smith filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit., ORDER, 1, The plaintiff moves to expedite this appeal and to reverse and remand the district court's judgment dismissing this civil rights case. The appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Brown, 803 F.2d at 122. No later decision by either court will affect the order. Because the voting has not yet been conducted, Century Glove's plan might be defeated or upheld whether or not the contested rejections are counted.4 Therefore, FAB argues, the district court's order is not yet final.
857 F.2d 240, 57 USLW 2248, Fed. 978, 99 L. Ed. 2d 194 (1988). Although he was in poor health, Bennie Taylor negotiated the stock sale through an attorney who testified that he advised caution in the sale and informed Taylor of the possibility of a First Union-Southern merger.
846 F.2d 751, First RepBk Dallasv.Fender, NO. 88-2039, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., MAY 04, 1988, 1, Appeal From: E.D.Tex., 2, DISMISSED.
Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770, 398 U.S. 235, 90 S. Ct. 127, 54 L. Ed. 2d 99 (1977). Postal Workers, 621 F.2d at 618 (injunction vacated where work shift eliminated but job security remained, despite threats to seniority, time off, vacation and convenience factors);
865 F.2d 1, 130 L.R.R.M., Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, COFFIN and SELYA, Circuit Judges., MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Entered November 22, 1988, 1, The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has filed a motion to transfer a petition for review to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
860 F.2d 1073, In re Pontarelli, NO. 88-1901, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., SEP 02, 1988, 1, Appeal From: D.R.I., 2, DENIED.
566, 46 L. Ed. 2d 407 (1975); involving case management order). Recticel, 859 F.2d at 1005 n. 4, 1, Which approval shall not be unreasonably denied, 2, Designating party includes non-party entities, 3, The party calling the deposition must pay the costs of the transcript as customary
860 F.2d 1073, U.S.v.Encarnacion (Manuel), NO. 88-1811, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit., SEP 28, 1988, 1, Appeal From: D.N.H., 2, VACATED AND REMANDED.
