The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More10, 13-14, 77 L. Ed. 2d 1431 (1983) (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice ), application to vacate stay denied, 464 U.S. 879, 104 S. Ct. See Plaza Health, 878 F.2d at 578 (applying the higher standard to an injunction prohibiting the government from suspending one plaintiff from Medicaid participation).
50 F.3d 105, 63 USLW 2687, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v.Maximo E. TEJADA-BELTRAN, Alias, etc., Defendant, Appellant. added four more levels because of appellant's role in the offense, see U.S.S.G. United States v. Ruiz, 905 F.2d 499, 508 (1st Cir.1990). See McDowell, 918 F.2d at 1011;
, 7, The first question is whether American Honda and Lyon Lyon may appeal from the discovery order. 1580, 29 L. Ed. 2d 85 (1971). The district judge's careful analysis, detailed order and document-by-document review--undertaken in the middle of a complex trial--were altogether admirable
available to Lyon Lyon. In light of, American Honda's disclosure of information acquired, through internal investigation, the court finds, that American Honda has waived the attorney-client, privilege with respect to documents containing, information acquired through internal, investigation.
71 F.3d 883, Murphyv.First South Production*, NO. 95-6220, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit., Nov 24, 1995, 1, Appeal From: N.D.Ala., No. 94-01946-CV-G-NE, 2, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3
John Francis Corcoran, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA, for Appellee. In No. 95-6112, Gilliam appeals from the district court's order denying his objection to the government's writ of execution against his property located in Scott County, Virginia.
, 7, In applying this rule, courts have granted a client relief from an attorney's conduct only in very limited circumstances, such as the attorney's death or the diagnosis of a debilitating medical condition, or not at all. No request or motion for such a hearing was made by Paik's new counsel.
67 F.3d 972, 314 U.S.App.D.C. and the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is, 2, ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion and order filed June 29, 1995.
, 15, Jason Realty argues (and the bankruptcy court held1) that the estate held an interest in the rents, because the assignment merely pledged the rents as security. of property subject to security interest as provided in section 552(b) of this title.
72 F.3d 122, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for FirstNational Bank of Toms River, N.J.v.William A. Greenberg, Charles N. Loccisano, Joel E.Perlmutter, John J. Tedesco v. Marriott Corporation, NO. 95-5051, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
During this time Norris never missed a scheduled payment. The bankruptcy court found the debt nondischargeable as to Robert Norris, who actually prepared the 1992 financial statement, concluding that he deliberately had misled the bank by providing misinformation to obtain the loan renewal.
584, 46 L. Ed. 2d 542 (1976); Furthermore, any qualms that the district court had concerning diversity jurisdiction should have been resolved by allowing Allstate to amend the removal petition to cure the defect under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1653 instead of sua sponte remanding the case to state court.
(quoting district court order). He held inter alia that Pacific Union was entitled to depose the three Directors because (1) the FDIC is a party to the Houston Action, and that action involves issues concerning Playa del Rio, which is the center of the Brownsville Action;
See Kan. Stat. Ann. However, because we agree with the district court that De Young's complaint does not state a claim for relief against Judge White in either capacity, we affirm the dismissal of the action. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments;
65 F.3d 163, Eleanor C.K. Smithv.Integra Bank, National First Mortgage Corporation, Donald Klein, NO. 95-3092, United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit., July 17, 1995, Appeal From: W.D.Pa., No. 94-01753 Lee, J., 1, AFFIRMED.
71 F.3d 878, Scottv.First Nat'l Bank of Benton*, NO. 95-30705, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., Nov 17, 1995, Appeal From: W.D.La., No. 95-CV-608, 1, REVERSED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2
51 F.3d 1042, Semienv.First Federal Savings**, NO. 95-30028, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., Mar 21, 1995, Appeal From: W.D.La., No. CA-94-2014, 1, DISMISSED., **, Conference Calendar
70 F.3d 126, Lytlev.First Union Nat'l Bank*, NO. 95-2509, United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit., Oct 26, 1995, 1, Appeal From: M.D.Fla., No. 94-01375-CIV-T-17E, 2, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 11th Cir.R. 34-3
Madden v. U.S. Assocs., 6, Plaintiffs do not dispute that Giacometti and the NCUA defendants lacked any contacts with Arkansas, but they argue that actions taken by the NCUA defendants also harmed Loftin and Davis. v. Golden State Strawberries, Inc., 747 F.2d 448, 456 (8th Cir.1985). Ark.Code Ann.
77 F.3d 474, First Statev.North River, Ins.*, NO. 95-20566, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit., Dec 14, 1995, Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. 93-CV-3497, 1, AFFIRMED., *, Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2
