Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Weedin v. Banzo Okada, 4332 (1924)

2 F.2d 321 (1924) WEEDIN, Immigration Com'r, v. BANZO OKADA. No. 4332. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 24, 1924. Thos. P. Revelle, U. S. Atty., and C. T. McKinney, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash., for appellant. James Kiefer, of Seattle, Wash., for appellee. Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges. RUDKIN, Circuit Judge. Section 19 of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (39 Stat. 889 [Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 4289¼jj]), provides that,...

# 1
Moore v. United States, 4306 (1924)

1 F.2d 839 (1924) MOORE et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 4306. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1924. Rehearing Denied November 24, 1924. *840 *841 J. Robert O'Connor and Schenck & Kittrelle, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs in error. David V. Cahill and Charles L. Nichols, Sp. Assts. Atty. Gen., for the United States. Before GILBERT, ROSS, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges. RUDKIN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The first and principal assignment of error...

# 2
Calnay v. United States, 4301 (1924)

1 F.2d 926 (1924) CALNAY v. UNITED STATES. No. 4301. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 27, 1924. Charles H. Brennan and Harold C. Faulkner, both of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error. Joseph C. Burke, U. S. Atty., and Robert B. Camarillo, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Eugene T. McGann, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Los Angeles, Cal. Before GILBERT, ROSS, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges. GILBERT, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff in error was convicted under two counts of an indictment...

# 3
The West Hartland, 4298 (1924)

2 F.2d 834 (1924) THE WEST HARTLAND. No. 4298. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 17, 1924. G. R. Snider, Admiralty Counsel, U. S. Shipping Board, and Horace M. Gray, Asst. Admiralty Counsel, U. S. Shipping Board, both of New York City (MacCormac Snow, District Counsel, U. S. Shipping Board, of Portland, Or., and Bronson, Robinson & Jones, of Seattle, Wash., of counsel), for the United States. B. S. Grosscup and W. C. Morrow, both of Seattle, Wash., for Pacific S. S. Co. W. H....

# 4
McCoy v. Pacific Spruce Corporation, 4295 (1924)

1 F.2d 853 (1924) McCOY et al. v. PACIFIC SPRUCE CORPORATION. No. 4295. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1924. *854 I. H. Van Winkle and Wm. P. Ellis, both of Salem, Or., and L. A. Liljeqvist, of Portland, Or., for appellants. McCamant & Thompson, and Ralph H. King, all of Portland, Or., for appellee. Before HUNT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and BOURQUIN, District Judge. RUDKIN, Circuit Judge. There is no controversy over the facts in this case. Prior to the 10th day of...

# 5
Cullen v. United States, 4284 (1924)

2 F.2d 524 (1924) CULLEN et al. v. UNITED STATES. [*] No. 4284. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1924. *525 Alfred L. Bartlett, Thos. P. White, Leo M. Rosecrans, and Otto J. Emme, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff in error King. Schenck & Kittrelle and J. M. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs in error Cullen and Dennison. David V. Cahill and Charles L. Nichols, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for the United States. Before GILBERT, ROSS, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges....

# 6
Deupree v. United States, 4265 (1924)

2 F.2d 44 (1924) DEUPREE v. UNITED STATES. No. 4265. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 27, 1924. *45 J. H. Peterson and T. C. Coffin, both of Pocatello, Idaho, for plaintiff in error. E. G. Davis, U. S. Atty., and James F. Ailshie, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boise, Idaho. Before GILBERT, ROSS, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges. ROSS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). It has been repeatly held by this court that, where a motion for a directed verdict is made upon the...

# 7
Fiorito v. Clyde Equipment Co., 4262 (1924)

2 F.2d 807 (1924) FIORITO et al. v. CLYDE EQUIPMENT CO. No. 4262. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. December 15, 1924. Rehearing Denied February 2, 1925. Grinstead, Laube & Laughlin and Thomas E. Davis, all of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs in error. Van Dyke & Thomas, of Seattle, Wash., for defendant in error. Before HUNT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and BOURQUIN, District Judge. *808 BOURQUIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs in error brought this action at law to recover special damages...

# 8
Stubbs v. United States, 4236 (1924)

1 F.2d 837 (1924) STUBBS v. UNITED STATES. No. 4236. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1924. Rehearing Denied November 24, 1924. *838 James F. O'Brien, Burkey & Burkey, and M. J. Gordon, all of Tacoma, Wash., for plaintiff in error. Thos. P. Revelle, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and W. W. Mount, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Tacoma, Wash. Before HUNT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and BOURQUIN, District Judge. RUDKIN, Circuit Judge. This is a writ of error to review a judgment of...

# 9
Reyff v. United States, 4227 (1924)

2 F.2d 39 (1924) REYFF et al. v. UNITED STATES. [*] No. 4227. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 3, 1924. Edward A. O'Dea, of San Francisco, Cal., and R. G. Retallick, of Fresno, Cal., for appellants. Joseph C. Burke, U. S. Atty., Mark L. Herron, Asst. U. S. Atty., and John R. Layng, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Los Angeles, Cal. Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges. GILBERT, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an indictment which charged them...

# 10
Cooling Tower Co. v. CF Braun & Co., 4221 (1924)

1 F.2d 178 (1924) COOLING TOWER CO., Inc., v. C. F. BRAUN & CO. No. 4221. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. August 4, 1924. Edward A. O'Brien, of San Francisco, Cal. (Ashley & Foulds and Andrew Foulds, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant and cross-appellee. Chas. E. Townsend, of San Francisco, Cal. (Wm. A. Loftus, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee and cross-appellant. Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges. GILBERT, Circuit Judge. This is a...

# 11
Neil Bros. Grain Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 4219 (1924)

1 F.2d 904 (1924) NEIL BROS. GRAIN CO. et al. v. HARTFORD FIRE INS. CO. et al. No. 4219. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 13, 1924. *905 *906 O. C. Moore, of Spokane, Wash., for plaintiffs in error. E. Eugene Davis, of Spokane, Wash., for defendants in error. Before GILBERT, MORROW, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges. RUDKIN, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The power of the court below to withdraw the case from the jury and enter judgments on the merits in favor of the...

# 12
Sayers v. United States, 4218 (1924)

2 F.2d 146 (1924) SAYERS v. UNITED STATES. No. 4218. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1924. *147 Edward H. Chavelle, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff in error. Thos. P. Revelle, U. S. Atty., and J. W. Hoar, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash. Before HUNT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and BOURQUIN, District Judge. BOURQUIN, District Judge. Defendant below, convicted of unlawful possession and sale of intoxicating liquor, assigns errors which in brief and argument are...

# 13
King v. United States, 4210 (1924)

1 F.2d 931 (1924) KING v. UNITED STATES. No. 4210. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. October 20, 1924. Edward H. Chavelle, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff in error. Thos. P. Revelle, U. S. Atty., and J. W. Hoar, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash. Before HUNT and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges, and BOURQUIN, District Judge. BOURQUIN, District Judge. To conviction for unlawfully importing smoking opium and likewise buying, receiving, and concealing it, the principal error assigned by...

# 14
Western Meat Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 4064 (1924)

1 F.2d 95 (1924) WESTERN MEAT CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. No. 4064. Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. September 2, 1924. *96 *97 Sullivan & Sullivan, Theo. J. Roche, and Edward I. Barry, all of San Francisco, Cal., and Frank L. Horton, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. W. H. Fuller, Chief Counsel Federal Trade Commission, and James M. Brinson, Attorney Federal Trade Commission, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent. Before GILBERT, ROSS, and HUNT, Circuit Judges. ROSS, Circuit...

# 15

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer