881 F.2d 777 ALLEGHANY CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents, and Frank M. Singer, Real Party in Interest. No. 89-70270. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 26, 1989. Decided Aug. 4, 1989. Before TANG, PREGERSON and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 The petition for writ of mandamus, seeking review of the district court's order remanding this action to state court, is dismissed for lack of...
891 F.2d 296 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur TUVERSON, Cynthia Tuverson, Petitioners-Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-70174. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4,...
891 F.2d 294 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nemecio ESCORCIA-GARCIA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 89-70150. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 31, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'...
891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio ROMAN-PASILLAZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 89-70127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Oct. 31, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'...
872 F.2d 310 SUNSHINE BEAUTY SUPPLIES, INC., d/b/a Consumer Products Associates Distributors, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, and Armstrong-McCall, Real Party in Interest. No. 89-70073. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 6, 1989. Decided April 6, 1989. Charles R. Chapman, Conkle & Olesten, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Stephen B. Mains, Leland, Parchini, Steinberg, Flinn, Matzger & Melnick, Los...
889 F.2d 210 132 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2961 , 113 Lab.Cas. P 11,648 SIERRA PUBLISHING COMPANY d/b/a The Sacramento Union, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Nos. 88-7522, 89-70037. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 5, 1989. Decided Nov. 3, 1989. Mark H. Van Brussel, Sacramento, Cal., for petitioner. David A. Seid, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review and Cross Petition for Enforcement of Decision and Order of the National...
884 F.2d 420 Santiago MORAN-ENRIQUEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Nos. 86-7739, 89-70010. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 18, 1989. Decided Aug. 29, 1989. James McConnell Bush, Steptoe & Johnson, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner. David V. Bernal, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civ. Div., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Before WIGGINS, KOZINSKI...
888 F.2d 609 58 USLW 2316, 12 U.S.P.Q.2d 1740 VISION SPORTS, INC., a California corporation; Vision Street Wear, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MELVILLE CORPORATION, a New York corporation doing business in California as Melville Shoe Corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 89-55592. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 10, 1989. Decided Oct. 18, 1989. Robert Neuner, New York City, for defendant-appellant. Darrell L. Olson, Newport Beach, Cal., for plaintiffs-...
888 F.2d 1276 Donald Lee McLAUGHLIN, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and Cois Byrd as Sheriff and individually, Defendants-Appellants. Ian McGREGOR, Margine Bonner, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and Floyd Tidwell as Sheriff and individually, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 89-55534, 89-55542. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 11, 1989. Decided Nov. 8,...
891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sidney W.L. HAMMONS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert Glen BORG, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 89-55372. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1989. * Decided Dec. 6, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'...
886 F.2d 1228 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,418, 14 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1298 Marian HOLLYWOOD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SANTA MARIA; Dorothy Lyman; Michael A. Maramonte; Wayne Schwammel, Defendants-Appellees. (Two Cases) Nos. 87-6455, 89-55350. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted to Motions Panel June 12, 1989 * . Decided Oct. 6, 1989. Alan A. Blakeboro, Matsinger & Blakeboro, Santa Barbara, Cal., for Marian Hollywood. Mary L. Dowell, Liebert, Cassidy & Frierson, Los Angeles,...
873 F.2d 238 In re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS. Ahmad SHAMS, Witness-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-55320. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 21, 1989. * Decided April 26, 1989. Donald M. Re, Los Angeles, Cal., for witness-appellant. Mark A. Byrne, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Attys. Office, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE, ALARCON,...
891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Leonadiza L. QUIMBO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Ernest Gustafson, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-55317. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4,...
891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jesus Maria OCHOA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-55264. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before ALARCON, O'...
892 F.2d 1045 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Etta M. COLLIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-55241. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1989. * Decided Dec. 21, 1989. Before GOODWIN,...
891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence S. KRAIN, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Myron BROWN, Ted Millard, Kathleen O'Leary, Marsha Miller, Esq., Barbara Perez, et al., Walter Work, Howard Weiner; R. Butler, Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-55127. United States...
891 F.2d 297 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abraham T. YANG, Petitioner, v. James ROWLAND, Ed Veit, L.E. Debord, Estelle Wayne, et al, Respondents. No. 89-55089. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1989. * Decided Dec. 4, 1989. Before...
891 F.2d 295 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ronald Mark MILLER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-55065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 7, 1989. * Decided Dec. 8, 1989....
892 F.2d 83 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Tommy Vander JACKSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ed MYERS, Superintendent; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 89-55043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1989....
892 F.2d 1046 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Saulo Cortez RENDON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee. No. 89-55032. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 1, 1989. * Decided Dec. 14, 1989. 1 Appeal from the...
