961 F.2d 964 295 U.S.App.D.C. 210 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. UNITED STATES of America v. ONE 1986 MERCEDES BENZ, VIN WDBDA24D6GF150403, with all Appurtenances and Attachments thereon, Beverly E. Nelson, Appellant. No. 90-5357....
978 F.2d 744 298 U.S.App.D.C. 247 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Paul Exzure COFIELD, Petitioner. No. 92-8027. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 30, 1992. Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, KAREN...
976 F.2d 46 298 U.S.App.D.C. 98 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Louis Charles SHEPTIN, Petitioner. No. 92-8024. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 17, 1992. Before STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, SENTELLE...
976 F.2d 45 298 U.S.App.D.C. 97 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Meekaaeel Abduallah AL-MALIK, Petitioner. No. 92-8019. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 17, 1992. Before STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS,...
976 F.2d 1444 298 U.S.App.D.C. 140 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Sylvester JONES, Petitioner. No. 92-8009. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 17, 1992. Before WILLIAMS, SENTELLE and HENDERSON,...
976 F.2d 46 298 U.S.App.D.C. 98 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Roszetta M. McNEILL, Petitioner. No. 92-8001. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Aug. 28, 1992. Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and BUCKLEY...
976 F.2d 45 298 U.S.App.D.C. 97 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Arthur COLLINS, Jr., Appellant, v. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL; Department of Education. No. 92-7122. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 15,...
966 F.2d 702 296 U.S.App.D.C. 182 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Melvin LENKIN, Thelma Z. Lenkin, Petitioners. No. 92-7083. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. May 20, 1992. Before WALD, D.H. GINSBURG...
976 F.2d 46 298 U.S.App.D.C. 98 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Sceva J. KENDALL, Appellant, v. John FERREN, individually and as Judges of the D.C. Court of Appeals, et al. Nos. 92-7031, 92-7032. United States Court of Appeals,...
959 F.2d 1102 295 U.S.App.D.C. 98 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. William REBACK v. Charles Parsons, et al., Appellants. William REBACK v. Charles C. PARSONS; and Reback & Parsons, Attorneys at Law, Chartered, Appellants. Nos. 91-...
957 F.2d 911 294 U.S.App.D.C. 162 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Joan EDDY, Executor of the Estate of James Peter Eddy, Petitioner. No. 92-7003. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 20, 1992....
969 F.2d 1050 34 ERC 2087 , 297 U.S.App.D.C. 50, 60 USLW 2808, 1992-1 Trade Cases P 69,857, 22 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1133 The LTV CORPORATION, et al., Appellants, v. GULF STATES STEEL, INC. OF ALABAMA, Appellee. No. 92-7001. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 4, 1992. Decided June 12, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 20, 1992. Guy Miller Struve, with whom Karen E. Wagner, New York City, and Jerome G. Snider, Washington, D.C., were on the brief,...
979 F.2d 227 298 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 61 USLW 2316 NATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Appellant. No. 92-5252. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Oct. 14, 1992. Decided Nov. 3, 1992. [298 U.S.App.D.C. 289] Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (Civil Action No. 92cv00935). Robert V. Zener, Atty.,...
971 F.2d 765 297 U.S.App.D.C. 302 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. COALITION TO END THE PERMANENT CONGRESS, et al., Appellants, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, et al., Donnald K. Anderson, et al. No. 92-5239. United States Court of Appeals,...
979 F.2d 219 298 U.S.App.D.C. 280 COALITION TO END THE PERMANENT CONGRESS, et al., Appellants, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, et al., Donald K. Anderson, et al. No. 92-5239. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued July 27, 1992. Decided July 30, 1992. Nov. 13, 1992. Paul R.Q. Wolfson argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Alan B. Morrison. Charles Tiefer, Deputy Gen. Counsel to the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives, argued the cause for appellees. With...
983 F.2d 298 299 U.S.App.D.C. 273 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. Irene S. ATRAQCHI, et al., Appellants, v. UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al. No. 92-5238. United States Court of Appeals, District of...
971 F.2d 766 297 U.S.App.D.C. 303 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Douglas Henry THORNTON, Petitioner. Nos. 91-8030, 92-5203. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. June 5, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En...
971 F.2d 766 297 U.S.App.D.C. 303 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Francis FERRI, et al., Petitioners. Nos. 91-8029, 92-5202. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. June 5, 1992. Before HARRY T. EDWARDS,...
976 F.2d 46 298 U.S.App.D.C. 98 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. In re Sedessa RUSTIN, Administratrix of the Estate of James Kenneth Tate. No. 92-5190. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Aug. 31, 1992....
976 F.2d 46 298 U.S.App.D.C. 98 NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant. HALMAN, S.A., et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America. No. 92-5178. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Aug. 31, 1992. Before BUCKLEY,...
