Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Micro Motion Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., 89-1117 (1988)

873 F.2d 1450 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. MICRO MOTION INCORPORATED, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KANE STEEL CO., INC., Appellant....

# 1
Sealtite Corporation v. The United States, 89-1084 (1988)

873 F.2d 1450 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. SEALTITE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee. No. 89-1084....

# 2
89-1036 (1988)

867 F.2d 615 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. INTERVET AMERICA, INC., Plaintff-Appellant, v. KEEVET LABORATORIES, INC., Robert D....

# 3
Federal Trade Commission v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 88-5048 (1988)

850 F.2d 694 271 U.S.App.D.C. 1 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellant v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., et al. No. 88-5048. Civ. A. No. 88-00022. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. April 8, 1988. Prior report: 681 F. Supp. 27 . Before ROBINSON, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM. 1 Upon consideration of Appellant's Suggestion of Mootness and Motion to Vacate Order of the District Court and to Remand With Instructions to Dismiss Complaint, and the...

# 4
88-4034 (1988)

846 F.2d 1012 19 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 76, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,342 In the Matter of Alois A. REINERS, et ux., Debtors. Alois A. REINERS, and Lucille Gossen Reiners, Appellants, v. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF JACKSON, Appellee. No. 88-4034 Summary Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 13, 1988. David F. Townsend, Opelousas, La., for appellants. Mary L. Fullinton, Carmouche, Gray & Hoffman, Lake Charles, La., for appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the...

# 5
Rosa M. Brown v. Department of the Navy, 88-3438 (1988)

865 F.2d 269 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Rosa M. BROWN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent. No. 88-3438....

# 6
Jody L. Bernard v. Office of Personnel Management, 88-3435 (1988)

873 F.2d 1450 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Jody L. BERNARD, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 7
Carunda D. Krishnan v. Department of the Air Force, 88-3427 (1988)

865 F.2d 268 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Carunda D. KRISHNAN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the AIR FORCE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 8
James L. Worthington v. Department of Agriculture, 88-3405 (1988)

865 F.2d 268 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. James L. WORTHINGTON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 9
Edward E. Marshall v. United States Postal Service, 88-3398 (1988)

865 F.2d 268 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Edward E. MARSHALL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 10
Milton K. Kuntz v. United States Postal Service, 88-3393 (1988)

865 F.2d 269 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Milton K. KUNTZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 11
Franklin D. Harris v. Department of the Navy, 88-3387 (1988)

865 F.2d 269 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Franklin D. HARRIS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent. No. 88-3387....

# 12
Joseph F. Rohrer v. Office of Personnel Management, 88-3379 (1988)

864 F.2d 149 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Joseph F. ROHRER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 13
Joann Marshburn v. United States Postal Service, 88-3378 (1988)

864 F.2d 148 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Joann MARSHBURN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 14
Silverio D. Tambo v. Office of Personnel Management, 88-3365 (1988)

867 F.2d 615 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Silverio D. TAMBO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No....

# 15
B. Louise Wallace v. Office of Personnel Management, 88-3363 (1988)

864 F.2d 149 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. B. Louise WALLACE, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No....

# 16
Ronald v. Jones v. United States Postal Service, 88-3360 (1988)

864 F.2d 149 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Ronald V. JONES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 17
Perry L. Burrell v. United States Postal Service, 88-3351 (1988)

864 F.2d 149 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Perry L. BURRELL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 88-...

# 18
Frank Johnson v. Department of the Army, 88-3350 (1988)

864 F.2d 148 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Frank JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent. No. 88-3350....

# 19
Barbara W. Franklin v. Department of the Navy, 88-3341 (1988)

865 F.2d 269 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Barbara W. FRANKLIN, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent. No. 88-3341....

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer