STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER RICHARD P. MATSCH, Senior District Judge. The Court has reviewed and considered the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Protective Order. Based on the Joint Motion, it appears that discovery in this case may involve the disclosure of confidential information by the parties and potentially by persons who are not parties to this action. The Court finds that the parties have established good cause for the entry of a protective order. Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ....
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. Each Party and each Counsel of Record stipulate and move the Court for a Protective Order pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure concerning the treatment of Confidential Information (as hereinafter defined), and, as grounds therefor, state as follows: 1. In this action, at least one of the Parties has sought and/or is seeking Confidential Information (as defined in paragraph 2 below). The Parties...
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Guadalupe Sanchez-Penunuri's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. # 1.) For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Mr. Sanchez-Penunuri's petition. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Sanchez-Penunuri is a native and citizen of Mexico who first entered the United States in 1985 and obtained legal permanent residency in 1990. In 2003, Mr. Sanchez-...
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER JOHN L. KANE, Senior District Judge. Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the undersigned parties— plaintiff SEC, defendants Roger Parker and Michael Van Gilder, and non-party Van Gilder Insurance Corporation ("VGIC") ("Party" or "Parties")—hereby stipulate and move, through counsel, for a Protective Order concerning the treatment of confidential information produced by VGIC in response to the Subpoena Duces Tecum attached hereto as...
ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Petitioner Juan Castillo Hernandez's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. (Doc. # 1.) This Court has already granted Mr. Castillo's habeas petition. (Doc. # 10.) Below, the Court sets forth in full its reasoning for granting this relief. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Castillo is a native and citizen of Mexico who first entered the United States in 1995. His habeas...
PROTECTIVE ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and in accordance with the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Confidential information shall be designated by stamping "CONFIDENTIAL" on the copies of the document produced. Stamping "CONFIDENTIAL" on the cover of any multipage document shall designate all pages of the document as Confidential Material, unless otherwise stated by the producing party. In the case of...
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CRAIG B. SHAFFER, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court upon the Plaintiff's and Named Defendants' Stipulated Motion for a Protective Order designed and intended to preserve the confidentiality and privacy of documents and other information to be exchanged between them pursuant to their respective disclosure and discovery obligations in the above-captioned action, and the Court being fully advised in the premises and for good cause appearing, the...
ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on United States' Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 50] filed by plaintiff United States of America ("United States"). This is a forfeiture case wherein the United States seeks to forfeit a residence used to grow marijuana for purposes of distributing it. The Court's jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. 1331. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are undisputed unless otherwise indicated. At all relevant...
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PATENTS '149 AND '611 AND GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON VALIDITY OF THE '149 PATENT David M. Ebel, U.S. CIRCUIT JUDGE This order addresses two matters pending before the Court: (1) Defendants BI Incorporated and Geo Care, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Doc. 136) (the "Summary Judgment Motion"); and (2) Plaintiff Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Validity Regarding the '149...
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROTECTIVE ORDER MICHAEL E. HEGARTY, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER, having come before the Court upon the parties' Joint Motion for Entry of Confidentiality and Protective Order and the Court being fully advised, HEREBY ORDERS that to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of documents and information produced in this lawsuit, the parties' Confidentiality and Protective Agreement below is hereby entered as an Order of the Court. Fisher Sand and Gravel Co. d/b/a Arizona...
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Babcock, J. This case is before me on Defendants Allied Jewish Federation of Colorado ("AJF") and Doug Seserman's ("Seserman") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim Under the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (the "CADA") Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc #6]. After consideration of the motion, all related pleadings, and the case file, I grant Defendants' motion in part and deny it in part as set forth below. I. Background In this action, Plaintiff asserts a...
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS William J. Martinez, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Joseph J. Gomez ("Plaintiff") brings this consumer class action against Defendant Kroll Factual Data, Inc. ("Defendant"), a consumer reporting agency, for negligent and willful violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA"), 15 U.S.C. 1681. Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss ("Motion"). (ECF No. 18.) For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is denied. I....
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE William J. Martinez, United States District Judge. This appeal from an administrative denial of benefits under the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act ("RECA") is before the Court under 42 U.S.C. 2210 note, Sec. 6( l ). Plaintiff Eppie Espinoza ("Plaintiff") challenges the final decision of Defendant, the Department of Justice ("DOJ"), denying his application for benefits under RECA. The Court held Oral Argument in this case on November...
ORDER R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge. This is an appeal from the denial of benefits under an ERISA plan. The case has featured an unusual degree of quarreling about the administrative record and the standard of review. Ultimately, however, it was briefed on the merits and became ripe for review by this Court on March 22, 2013. The matter thereafter tumbled through the cracks, and for that the Court extends its apology to the parties and counsel. For the reasons set forth...
PROTECTIVE ORDER KRISTEN L. MIX, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.26(c), and upon a showing of good cause in support of the entry of a Protective Order to protect the production, discovery, and dissemination of confidential information and/or sensitive financial data or records in the possession or control of Plaintiff Mark Aspiri ("Aspiri") and Defendant Legal Life Plans, Inc. ("Legal Life"), collectively ("the Parties"), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. This Protective Order shall...
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS William J. Martinez United States District Judge. Plaintiff Delbert E. Maxfield ("Plaintiff") has brought this civil action under 42 U.S.C. 1983 against Defendants Dave Bressler and the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado ("Board of Commissioners") (collectively "Defendants"), alleging violations of the First Amendment and wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. (Am. Compl. (ECF No....
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION CRAIG B. SHAFFER, Magistrate Judge. This Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Discovery of Electronically Stored Information shall be the governing document by which the parties and the Court manage the production of documents and data, including electronically stored information ("ESI") in this action. This Stipulation and Proposed Order shall govern all parties to these proceedings and all parties...
STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA, Magistrate Judge. WHEREAS, the following factors that outweigh any interests of potential third parties to obtain access to discovery materials support a finding that "good cause" exists for issuing a Protective Order: disclosure of trade secrets or other proprietary business information contained in the discovery will violate the interest of the parties; neither litigant is a public entity or official; and the sharing of the information...
CONSENT ORDER APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE RECEIVER'S SALE OF PROPERTY MARCIA S. KRIEGER, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Expedited Motion for the Court to Approve and Confirm the Sale of Property and Receiver's Report on Same (the "Motion"). Upon review of the Motion, with the consent of Plaintiff and Defendants as evidenced by the signatures of their respective counsel below and for good cause shown, the Court FINDS as follows: 1. Pursuant to the Order...
ORDER KRISTEN L. MIX, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant's oral Motion to Compel Production of Documents [#253] (the "Motion") 1 . The Court held a hearing on the Motion on August 1, 2013. See generally Minutes/Minute Order [#253]. On August 19, 2013, Plaintiff submitted a Memorandum Re Jackson Hospital Factors (attached hereto as Attachment A), a Declaration of EEOC Chair Jacqueline A. Berrien (attached hereto as Attachment B) and the disputed...
