Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

United States Customs Court

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Globemaster Midwest, Inc. v. United States, R.D. 11758 Reappraisement No. R62-15424 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Dec. 30, 1971

337 F. Supp. 465 (1971) GLOBEMASTER MIDWEST, INC. v. UNITED STATES. R.D. 11758; Reappraisement No. R62/15424. United States Customs Court. December 30, 1971. *466 Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (Joseph Schwartz and Irving Levine, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Andrew P. Vance and Urban S. Mulvehill, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant. RE, Judge: The legal question presented in this appeal for reappraisement pertains to...

# 1
JE Bernard & Co. v. United States, R.D. 11739 Reappraisement R65-22938 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Mar. 29, 1971

324 F. Supp. 496 (1971) J. E. BERNARD & CO., Inc. v. UNITED STATES. R.D. 11739; Reappraisement R65/22938. United States Customs Court. March 29, 1971. *497 Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (Joseph Schwartz, New York City, of counsel) for plaintiff. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Steven P. Florsheim, New York City, trial attorney), for defendant. MALETZ, Judge: This case presents the issue not previously decided as to whether the doctrine of collateral estoppel is applicable...

# 2
Dollar Trading Corp. v. United States, C.D. 4290, Protest No. 66-42298-31186-65 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Nov. 01, 1971

349 F. Supp. 1395 (1971) DOLLAR TRADING CORP., Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant. C.D. 4290, Protest No. 66/42298-31186-65. United States Customs Court, Second Division. November 1, 1971. Tompkins & Tompkins, Staten Island, N. Y. (Allerton deC. Tompkins, Staten Island, N. Y., of counsel), for plaintiff. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Civ. Div., Customs Section, New York City (John A. Winters, Trial Atty., New York City), for defendant. Before RAO, FORD, and NEWMAN, JJ. RAO,...

# 3
Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. United States, C.D. 4267 Protest No. 68-55086-151 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Sep. 14, 1971

332 F. Supp. 203 (1971) COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. C.D. 4267; Protest No. 68/55086-151. United States Customs Court. September 14, 1971. Thacher, Proffitt, Prizer, Crawley & Wood, New York City (Robert S. Stitt and George W. Taliaferro, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Glenn E. Harris, New York City, trial atty.), for defendant. *204 RAO, Chief Judge: The merchandise involved in this...

# 4
American Express Company v. United States, C.D. 4266 Protest 68-59881-54944-67 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Sep. 13, 1971

332 F. Supp. 191 (1971) AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. C.D. 4266; Protest 68/59881-54944-67. United States Customs Court, Third Division. September 13, 1971. *192 *193 Edward Garfield, Howard M. Landa, Jay L. Samoff and Dolph R. Chianchiano, Greenbaum, Wolff & Ernst, New York City (Edward Garfield, New York City, of counsel), and Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, E. Thomas Honey, New York City, for plaintiff. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Andrew P. Vance, Glenn E. Harris and...

# 5
Haan v. United States, C.D. 4260 Protests 68-31495-101436, 68-54337-104761 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Aug. 27, 1971

332 F. Supp. 182 (1971) Vilem B. HAAN et al. v. UNITED STATES. C.D. 4260; Protests 68/31495-101436, 68/54337-104761. United States Customs Court, First Division. August 27, 1971. Glad & Tuttle, Los Angeles, Cal. (Robert Glenn White, Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for plaintiffs. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Herbert P. Larsen, and Urban S. Mulvehill, New York City, trial attys.), for defendant. Before WATSON, MALETZ and RE, Judges. RE, Judge. The question presented in these two...

# 6
CL Hutchins & Co. v. United States, C.D. 4252 Protest 67-25245-2353 (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Aug. 12, 1971

331 F. Supp. 318 (1971) C. L. HUTCHINS & CO., Inc., Imperial Rug Mills, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant. C.D. 4252; Protest 67/25245-2353. United States Customs Court. August 12, 1971. Glad & Tuttle, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs. L. Patrick Gray III, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendant. RAO, Chief Judge. Defendant has moved, under Rule 4.7 (b) of the Rules of this Court, to dismiss the above-entitled action on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim, (...

# 7
Imbert Imports, Inc. v. United States, A.R.D. 294 Reap. No. R63-5025 and 13 others (1971)
United States Customs Court Filed: Sep. 10, 1971

331 F. Supp. 1400 (1971) IMBERT IMPORTS, INC., et al., Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee. A.R.D. 294; Reap. No. R63/5025 and 13 others. United States Customs Court, Second Division, Appellate Term. September 10, 1971. *1401 *1402 Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (Norman C. Schwartz, David O. Elliott, New York City of counsel), for appellants. L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Glenn E. Harris, trial atty.), for appellee. Before LANDIS, MALETZ and NEWMAN, Judges. NEWMAN,...

# 8

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer