DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs XIU HUA YANG, LMT
Whether Respondent committed the child care licensing violations alleged in the Administrative Complaints; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent should be fined, and Respondent's child care license, should be revoked, due to violations of child care licensing standards.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS vs JULIAN CARRASQUILLA
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES vs KIDS R KREATIVE
REBECCA ANN VANDENBURGH vs DAVID ALLEN BOGUE
FRANCES M. MARSHALL vs HEIDI CHRISTINE BUTLER
LLIANA ARRUEBO vs JOSE CARLOS MESTRE-SANCHEZ
ANASTAISHA JEWELS VALDEZ vs TYLER ALEXANDER NORRIS
DAVONNA STANFORD vs EDWIN SMITH
JENNIFER RENEE GOODRICH vs JOSEPH WILLIAM ERCOLANO
JASMYN HAUGABOOK vs SILAS JAMES LAMBERT
VASHAWN CHANELL THURSTON vs JEFFREY BRADSHAW
AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION vs ACR COMMUNITY SERVICES, LLC
: 409.913
GREGORY GUILLAUME vs MARIE DANIELLE JEAN LOUIS
HEATHER CHEYENNE MESTRE vs JARED LEE BEACH
COREY LEIGH WILLIAMS vs BRIAN KEITH SWINNEY
BRITTANEY MICHELLE GREGORY vs ORRI KUSHUN MCGREW
MERCEDES BROOKE HARRIS vs DAVID LAMONT ROSS
SCKEPHANID SAINT-ARMAND vs MAURICE THOMPSON
Is Respondent, Rosebourne Investments, LLC (Rosebourne), along with related entities described in the “Determination: No Reasonable Cause,” an “employer” as defined by section 760.02(7), Florida Statutes (2018)?1/The evidence did not prove that Respondent was an employer as defined in s. 760.02(7). Petitioner did not prove how many people Respondent employed.
