199 U.S. 570 (1905) RUSSIAN-AMERICAN PACKING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 85, 86. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 29, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *572 Mr. Alexander Britton, with whom Mr. Aldis B. Browne was on the brief, for appellants in this case and in No. 86 argued simultaneously herewith. [1] Mr. Frederick De C. Faust, special attorney, with whom Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt was on the brief, for the United States in this...
199 U.S. 53 25 S. Ct. 715 50 L. Ed. 85 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. TWENTY-THIRD STREET RAILWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , v. STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS. NO 75. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CENTRAL CROSSTOWN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , v. STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS. NO 76. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , v. STATE BOARD OF TAX COMMISSIONERS. NO 77. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. NEW AMSTERDAM GAS...
199 U.S. 541 (1905) CLARK v. ROLLER. ROLLER v. CLARK. Nos. 72, 451. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 10, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *542 Mr. Leo Simmons for appellant in No. 72 and appellee in No. 451. Mr. John E. Roller pro. se, with whom Mr. J.O.B. Roller was on the brief, for intervenor and appellee in No. 72 and for appellant in No. 451. MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is an...
199 U.S. 501 (1905) FOPPIANO v. SPEED. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 67 and 68. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. *505 Mr. Wm. M. Randolph, with whom Mr. George Randolph and Mr. Wassell Randolph were on the brief, for plaintiff in error submitted. Mr. Charles T. Cates, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Tennessee, for defendant in error. *516 MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement,...
199 U.S. 414 (1905) UNITED STATES v. UTAH, NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA STAGE COMPANY. UTAH, NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA STAGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 51 and 52. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 8, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *421 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Louis A. Pradt and Mr. Joseph Stewart for the United States. Mr. A.A. Hoehling, Jr., and Mr. J.H. McGowan for Utah, Nevada and California Stage Company. MR. JUSTICE DAY, after making the...
199 U.S. 581 (1905) ECLIPSE BICYCLE COMPANY v. FARROW. Nos. 40, 217. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 3, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *582 Mr. A.S. Worthington and Mr. H.L. Osgood, with whom Mr. C. Schuyler Davis and Mr. D.S. Mackall were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Henry M. Earle and Mr. John C. Gittings for appellee. MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal from a final...
199 U.S. 260 (1905) COCHRAN AND THE FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY SAME v. SAME. Nos. 37, 112. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 2, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *263 Mr. Edgar H. Gans and Mr. Thomas A. Whelan for plaintiffs in error. Mr. William L. Martin and Jesse F. Stallings for defendant in error. *267 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the...
196 U.S. 611 (1905) SCOTTISH UNION AND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOWLAND. BOWLAND v. SCOTTISH UNION AND NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Nos. 360, 361. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 4, 5, 1905. Decided February 20, 1905. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *614 Mr. Judson Harmon and Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. W.O. Henderson was on the brief, for Scottish Union and National Insurance Company, appellant in No. 360 and...
198 U.S. 77 (1905) BEAVERS v. HAUBERT. SAME v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 354, 355. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 23, 1905. Decided April 17, 1905. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *79 Mr. William M. Seabury, with whom Mr. Bankson T. Morgan was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Purdy for the United States. *84 MR....
198 U.S. 236 (1905) BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO v. CHRISTIE GRAIN AND STOCK COMPANY. L.A. KINSEY COMPANY v. BOARD OF TRADE OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO. Nos. 224, 280. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 20, 24, 25, 1905. Decided May 8, 1905. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. *237 Mr. Henry S. Robbins for petitioner in No. 224 and respondent in No. 280. Mr. James H. Harkless and Mr....
198 U.S. 390 (1905) BIRRELL v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY. KIERNS v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 202, 203. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 27, 28, 1905. Decided May 15, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Mr. Alfred B. Cruikshank for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Ira A. Place and Mr. Edward Winslow Paige, with whom Mr. Thomas Emery was on the brief, for defendants in error. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. Plaintiffs...
199 U.S. 212 (1905) MARVIN v. TROUT. Nos. 19, 20. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 24, 25, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. *218 Mr. George F. Pendleton for plaintiff in error. Mr. John Poe for defendant in error. *222 MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff in error seeks to reverse the judgments herein, based on the gaming statute of Ohio, because, as he insists,...
197 U.S. 419 (1905) LINCOLN v. UNITED STATES. WARNER, BARNES AND COMPANY, LIMITED, v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 149, 466. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 3, 1905. Decided April 3, 1905. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *420 Mr. Henry M. Ward, Mr. Frederic R. Coudert and Mr. Paul Fuller for plaintiffs in error in No. 149 and appellant in No. 466. *427 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the...
196 U.S. 539 (1905) CITY OF WORCESTER v. WORCESTER CONSOLIDATED STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. SAME ET AL. v. SAME. SAME ET AL. v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 144, 145, 146, 147 and 148. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 23, 24, 1905. Decided February 20, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL AND THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. *543 Mr. Arthur P. Rugg, with whom Mr. John R. Thayer was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Bentley W. Warren for...
198 U.S. 100 (1905) COVINGTON v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COVINGTON. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF COVINGTON v. COVINGTON. Nos. 113, 114. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 5, 1905. Decided April 17, 1905. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. *104 Mr. J.H. Hazelrigg, with whom Mr. F.J. Hanlon and Mr. Ira Julian were on the brief, for the City of Covington. Mr. Shelley D. Rouse and Mr. Edmund F. Trabue, with whom Mr. James S. Pirtle, Mr....
197 U.S. 1 (1905) NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ELY. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 102, 88. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 15, 1904. Decided February 20, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. Mr. C.W. Bunn and Mr. James B. Kerr for plaintiff in error. Mr. William E. Cullen and Mr. Samuel R. Stern for Ely, defendant in error. *2 Mr. Harold Preston and Mr. F.T. Post for Browne and others, defendants in error, cited to effect that a railroad company may lose...
196 U.S. 115 (1905) FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSBORO v. LASATER. No. 73. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted December 6, 1904. Decided January 3, 1905. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. *116 Mr. J.W. Nichol, Mr. Thomas D. Sporer and Mr. E.W. Nicholson for plaintiff in error. There was no appearance or brief filed for defendant in error. *117 MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the...
197 U.S. 544 (1905) MUHLKER v. NEW YORK AND HARLEM RAILROAD COMPANY. No. 99. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 12, 13, 1905. Reargued February 24, 27, 1905. Decided April 10, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. *548 Mr. Elihu Root, with whom Mr. J.C. Bushby and Mr. L.M. Berkeley were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Ira A. Place, with whom Mr. Thomas Emery was on the brief, for defendants in error. *560 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after stating the case,...
196 U.S. 261 (1905) COOK v. MARSHALL COUNTY, IOWA. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 9, 12, 1904. Decided January 16, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. *262 Mr. Junius Parker, with whom Mr. W.W. Fuller and Mr. Frank S. Dunshee were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. F.E. Northup for defendant in error in this case and Mr. Henry Jayne for defendant in error in No. 150, argued simultaneously herewith. [1] *268 MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the...
196 U.S. 93 (1905) SMALLEY v. LAUGENOUR. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 28, 1904. Decided January 3, 1905. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. *95 Mr. C.S. Voorhees, Mr. Reese H. Voorhees, Mr. H.A.P. Myers and Mr. W.T. Warren for plaintiffs in error. Mr. W.C. Keegin, Mr. Herman D. Williams and Mr. James A. Williams for defendants in error. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The state...
