Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Garcia Maytin v. Vela, Nos. 90 and 245 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 21, 1910

216 U.S. 598 (1910) MONSERRATE GARCIA MAYTIN v. VELA. BEATRIZ DE LOS ANGELES, WIDOW OF ALOS, v. MONSERRATE AND DOMINGA GARCIA MAYTIN Nos. 90, 245. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 8, 9, 1910. Decided March 21, 1910. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. *599 Mr. N.B.K. Pettingill, with whom Mr. Robert H. Todd was on the brief, for appellant in No. 90, and appellee in No. 245. Mr. Willis Sweet for appellee in No. 90 and appellant in No. 245, submitted. MR. JUSTICE HOLMES...

# 1
Wilson v. United States, Nos. 759, 760, and 788 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 21, 1910

221 U.S. 361 31 S. Ct. 538 55 L. Ed. 771 CHRISTOPHER C. WILSON, Plff. in Err., v. UNITED STATES. NO 759. CHRISTOPHER C. WILSON, Appt., v. UNITED STATES. NO 760. CHRISTOPHER C. WILSON, Appt., v. UNITED STATES. NO 788. Nos. 759, 760, and 788. Argued March 2 and 3, 1911. Decided May 15, 1911. [Syllabus from pages 361-363 intentionally omitted] Messrs. John B. Stanchfield, Louis S. Levy, and William M. Parke for plaintiff in error and appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 363-365 intentionally...

# 2
Interstate Comm. Com. v. Chi., RI & Pac. Ry., Nos. 663, 664 (1910)

218 U.S. 88 (1910) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. BURNHAM, HANNA, MUNGER DRY GOODS COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 663, 664. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 5, 6, 1910. Decided May 31, 1910. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *89 Mr. Wade H. Ellis and Mr. Luther M. Walter, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Edwin P. Grosvenor, Special Assistant to the Attorney...

# 3
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Mazursky, Nos. 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 21, 1910

216 U.S. 122 (1910) ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. MAZURSKY. SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. McTEER. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CHARLES. SAME v. VON LEHE. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 58, 59, 60, 61, 62. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 9, 1909. Decided February 21, 1910. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. *125 Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, with whom Mr. P.A. Willcox, Mr. F.L. Willcox and Mr. Henry E. Davis were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr....

# 4
St. Louis, KC & CR Co. v. Wabash R. Co., Nos. 57 and 301 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 11, 1910

217 U.S. 247 (1910) ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD COMPANY v. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY AND CITY OF ST. LOUIS. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 57, 301. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 9, 1909. Decided April 11, 1910. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *248 Mr. Frank Hagerman, with whom Mr. W.F. Evans and Mr. M.A. Low were on the brief, for...

# 5
United States v. Carter, Nos. 551, 552, and 10, Original (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 18, 1910

217 U.S. 286 (1910) UNITED STATES v. OBERLIN M. CARTER. OBERLIN M. CARTER v. UNITED STATES. EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE UNITED STATES, PETITIONER. Nos. 551, 552. No. 10, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 13, 14, 1910. Decided April 18, 1910. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. *287 Mr. Marion Erwin, with whom Mr. Edwin W. Sims was on the brief for the United States, Appellant in No. 551 and *288 Appellee...

# 6
United States v. Mason, Nos. 510, 511, 512 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 05, 1910

218 U.S. 517 (1910) UNITED STATES v. MASON. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 510, 511, 512. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 18, 19, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Mr. Assistant Attorney-General Fowler for the United States. Mr. Boyd B. Jones, with whom Mr. George L. Wilson was on the brief, for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE HUGHES delivered the opinion of the court. The defendant, the clerk of...

# 7
Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Gaston, Nos. 451, 466 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 21, 1910

216 U.S. 418 (1910) LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. GASTON. CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 451, 466. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 16, 17, 1909. Submitted January 3, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. *419 Mr. Gregory L. Smith, with whom Mr. H.L. Stone was on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 451. Mr. Alfred P. Thom, with whom Mr. Alexander Pope Humphrey and Mr. James Weatherly were on the...

# 8
Eliot v. Freeman, Nos. 448 and 496 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 05, 1910

220 U.S. 178 31 S. Ct. 360 55 L. Ed. 424 AMORY ELIOT, Appt., v. JAMES G. FREEMAN, Robert A. Boit, Nathanael Thayer, and Robert H. Gardner. NO 448. MAINE BAPTIST MISSIONARY CONVENTION, Appt., v. CHARLES E. COTTING and Charles F. Adams, 2d, Trustees, etc. NO 496. Nos. 448 and 496. Argued January 19, 1911. Decided March 13, 1911. Messrs. Moorfield Storey, John W. Yerkes, Richard Hale, and Frank W. Grinnell for appellant in No. 448. [Argument of Counsel from pages 178-181 intentionally omitted]...

# 9
King v. West Virginia, Nos. 445, 446, 447 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 31, 1910

216 U.S. 92 (1910) KING v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA AND SPRUCE COAL AND LUMBER COMPANY. SAME v. SAME AND MILLS. SAME v. SAME AND BUSKIRK. Nos. 445, 446, 447. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 14, 15, 16, 1909. Decided January 31, 1910. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. Mr. Hannis Taylor and Mr. Maynard F. Stiles, with whom Mr. John G. Carlisle was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. William G. Conley, Attorney General of the State of *93 West...

# 10
Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. Miller & Lux, Nos. 4 and 5 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 07, 1910

218 U.S. 258 (1910) RICKEY LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY v. MILLER AND LUX. SAME v. WOOD. Nos. 4, 5. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 18, 19, 1910. Reargument January 31, 1910. Reargued October 24, 25, 1910. Decided November 7, 1910. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *259 Mr. Charles C. Boynton and Mr. James F. Peck, with whom Mr. Frederic D. McKenney was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Aldis B. Browne and Mr. E.F. Treadwell, with whom Mr. W.B....

# 11
National Bank of Commerce v. Downie, Nos. 31 and 32 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 28, 1910

218 U.S. 345 (1910) NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v. DOWNIE, TRUSTEE. SEATTLE NATIONAL BANK v. SAME. Nos. 31, 32. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 3, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Mr. George E. De Steiguer, with whom Mr. Frederick Bausman and Mr. Daniel Kelleher were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. J.E. Horan, with whom Mr. H.D. Cooley, Mr. W.A. Peters, Mr. J.H. Powell and Mr. Harold Preston were on the brief, for...

# 12
Southern R. Co. v. King, Nos. 140, 141 (1910)

217 U.S. 524 (1910) SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. JOSEPHINE KING. SAME v. INEZ KING. Nos. 140, 141. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 6, 7, 1910. Decided May 16, 1910. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *525 Mr. John J. Strickland, with whom Mr. A.P. Thom and Mr. Hamilton McWhorter were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Reuben R. Arnold for defendant in error. *530 MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court. These cases were tried...

# 13
Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Nebraska, Nos. 127, 128 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 04, 1910

217 U.S. 196 (1910) MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF NEBRASKA. SAME v. SAME EX REL. FARMERS' ELEVATOR COMPANY. Nos. 127, 128. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 7, 1910. Decided April 4, 1910. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. Mr. Balie P. Waggener, with whom Mr. James W. Orr was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. R.C. James, Mr. William P. Thompson and Mr. Norris Brown, with whom Mr. C. Gillespie was on the brief, for defendants in error. Mr....

# 14
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company, in Error v. United States, Nos. 124, 125 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 14, 1910

216 U.S. 617 30 S. Ct. 576 54 L. Ed. 639 BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 124, 125. Supreme Court of the United States March 14, 1910 1 Messrs. Edward Colston, Judson Harmon, A. W. Golsmith, and George Hoadly for plaintiff in error. 2 The Attorney General and the Solicitor General for defendant in error. 3 Judgments affirmed by a divided court and causes remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Southern district of...

# 15
United States v. American Tobacco, Nos. 118 and 119 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 11, 1910

221 U.S. 106 31 S. Ct. 632 55 L. Ed. 663 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appt., v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY and Others. NO 118. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY and Others, Appts., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. NO 119. Nos. 118 and 119. Argued January 3, 4, 5, and 16, 1910. Ordered for reargument April 11, 1910. Reargued January 6, 9, 10, 11, and 12, 1911. Decided May 29, 1911. [Syllabus from pages 106-108 intentionally omitted] Mr. J. C. McReynolds and Attorney General Wickersham for the United States on...

# 16
Albright v. Sandoval (No. 2), Nos. 116, 117 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 21, 1910

216 U.S. 331 (1910) ALBRIGHT v. SANDOVAL. SANDOVAL v. ALBRIGHT. Nos. 116, 117. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 28, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. Mr. E.L. Medler for Albright. Mr. Neill B. Field for Sandoval. *335 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. These cases involve controversies over the right to the fees of the office of assessor of Bernalillo County, New Mexico. Plaintiff in error received the...

# 17
Hawaiian Trust Co. v. Von Holt, Nos. 106, 107 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 21, 1910

216 U.S. 367 (1910) HAWAIIAN TRUST COMPANY, LIMITED, ET AL., EXECUTOR, v. VON HOLT ET AL., TRUSTEES. [1] SAME v. SAME. Nos. 106, 107. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 26, 1910. Decided February 21, 1910. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. Mr. Aldis B. Browne, with whom Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. Evans Broune, Mr. Sidney M. Ballou, Mr. Mason F. Prosser, Mr. Robbins B. Anderson, Mr. F.E. Thompson and Mr. C.F. Clemons were on the brief for appellants. Mr. E.M....

# 18
James A. Shine v. Fox Brothers Manufacturing Company, No 383 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 07, 1910

216 U.S. 609 30 S. Ct. 575 54 L. Ed. 636 JAMES A. SHINE et al., Appellants, v. FOX BROTHERS MANUFACTURING COMPANY. No 383. Supreme Court of the United States March 7, 1910 1 Messrs. Shepard Barclay, Thomas T. Fauntleroy, and Cornelius H. Fauntleroy for appellants. 2 Messrs. Herbert R. Marlatt and Frank H. Sullivan for appellee. 3 Per Curiam: In the circumstances disclosed by this record, we are of opinion that a direct appeal does not lie to this court from the decree of the circuit court, and...

# 19
Boston Chamber of Commerce v. Boston, 99 (1910)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 04, 1910

217 U.S. 189 (1910) BOSTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE v. CITY OF BOSTON. No. 99. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 2, 3, 1910. Decided April 4, 1910. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. *190 Mr. Charles A. Williams and Mr. Charles S. Hamlin for plaintiff in error. Mr. Thomas M. Babson for defendant in error. *193 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This is a petition for the assessment of damages caused by the laying out of a public street over 2955...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer