Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Missouri Rate Cases, Nos. 9, 12, 339, 340, 341, 342, 345, (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 16, 1913

230 U.S. 474 (1913) MISSOURI RATE CASES. [1] Nos. 9, 12, 339, 340, 341, 342, 345, 346, 349, 350, 351, 352, 357, 358, 365, 366, 367, 368. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 12, 13, 1910. Ordered for reargument April 10, 1911. Reargued April 1, 2, 3, 1912. Argued April 1, 2, 3, 1912. Decided June 16, 1913. APPEALS AND CROSS APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. *479 Mr. Elliott W. Major, Attorney General of Missouri, Mr. Sanford B....

# 1
United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co., Nos. 783, 784, 785, and 786 (1913)

229 U.S. 53 (1913) UNITED STATES v. CHANDLER-DUNBAR WATER POWER COMPANY. CHANDLER-DUNBAR WATER POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ST. MARYS POWER COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. BROWN, RECEIVER OF THE MICHIGAN LAKE SUPERIOR POWER COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 783, 784, 785, 786. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 28, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. *59 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Fowler, with whom Mr....

# 2
Zimmerman v. Harding, Nos. 771 and 894 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1913

227 U.S. 489 (1913) ZIMMERMAN v. HARDING. HARDING v. ZIMMERMAN. Nos. 771, 894. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 10, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. *491 Mr. N.B.K. Pettingill for Zimmerman. Mr. H.H. Scoville and Mr. Willis Sweet for Harding. *492 MR. JUSTICE LURTON, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. We agree with the court below that although there was no express...

# 3
Hughes v. United States, Nos. 718 and 719 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 16, 1913

230 U.S. 24 (1913) HUGHES v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. HUGHES. Nos. 718, 719. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 10, 1913. Decided June 16, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Mr. Waitman H. Conaway for appellant in No. 718 and appellee in No. 719. Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson and Mr. J. Harwood Graves for the United States. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court. This suit was commenced to recover from the United States the sum of...

# 4
Ettor v. Tacoma, Nos. 68 and 69 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 07, 1913

228 U.S. 148 (1913) ETTOR v. CITY OF TACOMA. HOWARD v. SAME. Nos. 68, 69. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 6, 1912. Decided April 7, 1913. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. *149 Mr. Stanton Warburton, with whom Mr. John M. Boyle, Mr. E.B. Brockway and Mr. C.M. Boyle were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Heman H. Field, with whom Mr. George W. Korte and Mr. T.L. Stiles were on the brief, for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE LURTON delivered the...

# 5
City and County of Denver v. New York Trust Co., Nos. 642 and 643 (1913)

229 U.S. 123 (1913) CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER v. NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER v. DENVER UNION WATER COMPANY ET AL. Nos. 642, 643. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 28, 29, 1912. Decided May 26, 1913. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *124 Mr. William H. Bryant and Mr. Charles W. Waterman, with whom Mr. William P. Malburn and *125 Mr. William A. Jackson were on the brief, for petitioners. [1] Mr. Henry McAllister, Jr., with whom...

# 6
United States v. Harvey Steel Co., Nos. 615 and 616 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 03, 1913

227 U.S. 165 (1913) UNITED STATES v. HARVEY STEEL COMPANY. MIDVALE STEEL COMPANY v. HARVEY STEEL COMPANY. Nos. 615, 616. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 6, 1913. Decided February 3, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Mr. James R. Sheffield and Mr. James J. Cosgrove for appellee, in support of motion to affirm. Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson and Mr. Philip M. Ashford for the United States, appellant in No. 615, in opposition to the motion. Mr. A.H....

# 7
Rogers v. Arkansas, Nos. 576 and 577 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1913

227 U.S. 401 (1913) ROGERS v. STATE OF ARKANSAS. BARNHILL v. SAME. Nos. 576, 577. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 21, 1913. Decided February 24, 1913. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. *402 Mr. A.C. Lyon for plaintiff in error: [1] Mr. Charles C. Reid, with whom Mr. Hal L. Norwood, Attorney General of Arkansas, Mr. Wm. H. Rector, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. T.M. Mehaffy were on the brief, for defendant in error: [1] *408 MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the...

# 8
Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, Nos. 573 and 639 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 16, 1913

230 U.S. 84 (1913) BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED, v. BOISE CITY. BOISE CITY v. BOISE ARTESIAN HOT AND COLD WATER CO., LIMITED. Nos. 573, 639. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 7, 8, 1913. Decided June 16, 1913. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. *85 Mr. Richard H. Johnson, with whom Mr. Richard Z. Johnson was on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 573, and defendant in error in No. 639. *86 Mr. Charles C. Cavanah and Mr....

# 9
United States v. Whitridge, Nos. 466 and 467 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 10, 1913

231 U.S. 144 (1913) UNITED STATES v. WHITRIDGE, RECEIVER OF THE THIRD AVENUE RAILROAD COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. JOLINE AND ROBINSON, RECEIVERS OF THE METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY. Nos. 466, 467. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 21, 1913. Decided November 10, 1913. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Graham for the United States. Mr. Joseph H. Choate, Jr., with whom Mr. Matthew C. Fleming was on the brief, for...

# 10
National City Bank of NY v. Hotchkiss, Nos. 459 and 460 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 03, 1913

231 U.S. 50 (1913) NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK v. HOTCHKISS, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF HASKINS. HOTCHKISS, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF HASKINS, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK. Nos. 459, 460. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 17, 20, 1913. Decided November 3, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *51 Mr. John A. Garver for appellant in No. 459 and for appellee in No. 460. Mr. Abram I. Elkus, with whom Mr. Wesley S. Sawyer was on the brief,...

# 11
Allen v. St. Louis, IM & SR Co., Nos. 440 and 441 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 16, 1913

230 U.S. 553 (1913) ALLEN ET AL., RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS, v. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. Nos. 440, 441. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 12, 15, 1912. Decided June 16, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. *554 Mr. Joseph M. Hill for appellants. Mr. John M. Moore, with whom Mr. Martin S. Clardy and Mr. Samuel H. West were on the...

# 12
Plumley v. United States, Nos. 35 and 36 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 06, 1913

226 U.S. 545 (1913) PLUMLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. PLUMLEY. Nos. 35, 36. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 9, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Mr. George A. King, with whom Mr. William B. King was on the brief, for appellant in No. 35, and appellee in No. 36. Mr. William W. Scott, with whom Mr. Assistant Attorney General John Q. Thompson was on the brief, for the United States. MR. JUSTICE LAMAR delivered the opinion of the court. In...

# 13
Knott v. St. Louis, KC & CR Co., Nos. 347 and 348 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 16, 1913

230 U.S. 512 (1913) KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS, v. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. ST. LOUIS, KANSAS CITY AND COLORADO RAILROAD CO. v. KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS. Nos. 347, 348. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 1, 2, 3, 1912. Decided June 16, 1913. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Memorandum opinion by direction of the court. BY MR. JUSTICE HUGHES....

# 14
Knott v. St. Louis Southwestern R. Co., Nos. 343, 344, 353, 354, 355, (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 16, 1913

230 U.S. 509 (1913) KNOTT ET AL., RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI, v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY CO. [1] ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KNOTT. Nos. 343, 344, 353, 354, 355, 356, 359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 369, 370, 371, 372. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 1, 2, 3, 1912. Decided June 16, 1913. APPEALS AND CROSS-APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. *510 Memorandum opinion by...

# 15
Gray v. Taylor, Nos. 322 and 483 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 20, 1913

227 U.S. 51 (1913) GRAY v. TAYLOR ET AL., AND LINCOLN COUNTY, TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO, BY CLANCY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ON THE RELATION OF ARAGON v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LINCOLN COUNTY, NEW MEXICO. Nos. 322, 483. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 6, 1913. Decided January 20, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. *52 Mr. T.B. Catron and Mr. George B. Barber for appellant. Mr. John Y. Hewitt and Mr. Andrew H. Hudspeth...

# 16
Baltic Mining Co. v. Massachusetts, Nos. 30 and 353 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 03, 1913

231 U.S. 68 (1913) BALTIC MINING COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. S.S. WHITE DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 30, 353. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 29, 30, 1913. Decided November 3, 1913. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. *69 Mr. William P. Everts and Mr. Charles A. Snow for plaintiffs in error. Mr. James M. Swift and Mr. Andrew Marshall for defendant in error. *78 MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion...

# 17
The Minnesota Rate Cases, Nos. 291, 292, 293 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1913

230 U.S. 352 (1913) THE MINNESOTA RATE CASES. SIMPSON ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE RAILROAD AND WAREHOUSE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA v. SHEPARD. SAME v. KENNEDY. SAME v. SHILLABER. Nos. 291, 292, 293. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 9, 10, 11, 12, 1912. Decided June 9, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. *356 Mr. Thomas D. O'Brien for appellants. Mr. Edward T. Young, also for the appellants. Mr. George T. Simpson, Attorney...

# 18
Pullman Co. v. Croom, Nos. 28 and 158 (1913)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 22, 1913

231 U.S. 571 (1913) THE PULLMAN COMPANY v. CROOM, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 28,158. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 31, November 3, 1913. Decided December 22, 1913. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. *574 Mr. Frank B. Kellogg, with whom Mr. Gustavus S. Fernald was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. T.F. West, Attorney General of the State of Florida, with whom Mr. Park Trammell, former Attorney...

# 19
First Nat. Bank of Claremore v. Keys, Nos. 263, 264, 302, and 303 (1913)

229 U.S. 179 (1913) FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CLAREMORE v. KEYS. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF VINITA v. SAME. CITIZENS' BANK OF PRYOR CREEK v. SAME. HOGAN v. SAME. Nos. 263, 264, 302, 303. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 25, 28, 1913. Decided May 26, 1913. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA. *183 Mr. W.H. Kornegay, with whom Mr. J. Howard Langley was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Robert F. Blair for defendants in error. MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after making the foregoing...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer