Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Cornell SS Co. v. Phoenix Constr. Co., Nos. 933, 934, and 935 (1914)

233 U.S. 593 (1914) CORNELL STEAMBOAT COMPANY v. PHOENIX CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 933, 934, 935. Supreme Court of United States. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 27, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Mr. E. Crosby Kindleberger for defendant in error, in support of motion. Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for plaintiff in error, in opposition to motion. *595 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court. The...

# 1
Platt v. City of New York, Nos. 85 and 86 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 05, 1914

232 U.S. 35 (1914) PLATT, TREASURER OF UNITED STATES EXPRESS COMPANY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK. CITY OF NEW YORK v. PLATT, TREASURER OF UNITED STATES EXPRESS COMPANY. Nos. 85, 86. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 3, 4, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. Walker D. Hines for United States Express Company. [1] *36 Mr. Terence Farley, with whom Mr. Archibald R. Watson was on the...

# 2
Barrett v. City of New York, Nos. 83 and 84 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 05, 1914

232 U.S. 14 (1914) BARRETT, PRESIDENT OF ADAMS EXPRESS CO., v. CITY OF NEW YORK. CITY OF NEW YORK v. BARRETT, PRESIDENT OF ADAMS EXPRESS CO. Nos. 83, 84. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 3, 4, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *15 Mr. William D. Guthrie for Adams Express Company. Mr. Walker D. Hines for the United States Express Company in Nos. 85 and 86, argued simultaneously...

# 3
Tap Line Cases, Nos. 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836 (1914)

234 U.S. 1 (1914) THE TAP LINE CASES. [1] Nos. 829, 830, 831, 832, 833, 834, 835, 836. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 8, 9, 13, 1914. Decided May 25, 1914. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COMMERCE COURT. *12 Mr. Blackburn Esterline, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom The Solicitor General and Mr. Karl W. Kirchwey, Attorney, were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. Charles W. Needham, with whom Mr. Joseph W. Folk was on the brief, for the Interstate Commerce...

# 4
Rainey v. United States, Nos. 74, 627, 73, and 628 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1914

232 U.S. 310 (1914) RAINEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RAINEY. RAINEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RAINEY. Nos. 74, 627, 73, 628. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 6, 7, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT...

# 5
United States v. Birdsall, Nos. 727, 728, and 729 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 06, 1914

233 U.S. 223 (1914) UNITED STATES v. BIRDSALL. UNITED STATES v. BRENTS. UNITED STATES v. VAN WERT. Nos. 727, 728, 729. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted and argued January 8, 9, 1914. Restored for reargument January 19, 1914. Reargued February 25, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. *224 The Solicitor General, Mr. Assistant Attorney General Denison and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Wallace for the United...

# 6
Pierce v. United States, Nos. 65 and 624 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1914

232 U.S. 292 (1914) PIERCE v. UNITED STATES (NO. 2). UNITED STATES v. PIERCE. Nos. 65, 624. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 6, 7, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. William D. Guthrie for the yacht owner in this and other cases argued simultaneously herewith. [1] Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins, with whom Mr. Karl W....

# 7
Ohio Tax Cases, Nos. 642 and 643 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 09, 1914

232 U.S. 576 (1914) OHIO TAX CASES. OHIO RIVER AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. DITTEY ET AL., AS THE TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO. MARIETTA, COLUMBUS AND CLEVELAND RAILROAD COMPANY v. CREAMER ET AL., AS THE TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO. Nos. 642, 643. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *580 Mr. Robert J. King and Mr F.A. Durban for appellants. *583 Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., and...

# 8
Gompers v. United States, Nos. 640 and 574 (1914)

233 U.S. 604 (1914) GOMPERS v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 640, 574. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 7, 8, 1914. Restored for reargument April 6, 1914. Reargued April 20, 21, 1914. Decided May 11, 1914. ERROR TO, APPEAL FROM AND ON PETITION FOR CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *605 Mr. Alton B. Parker and Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, with whom Mr. William E. Richardson was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error and appellants. Mr. J.J. Darlington and Mr. Daniel...

# 9
Pierce v. United States, Nos. 64 and 623 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1914

232 U.S. 290 (1914) PIERCE v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. PIERCE. Nos. 64 and 623. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 6, 7, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. William D. Guthrie, for the yacht owner in this and other cases argued simultaneously herewith. [1] *291 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins, with whom Mr. Karl W....

# 10
United States v. Goelet, Nos. 631 and 632 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1914

232 U.S. 293 (1914) UNITED STATES v. GOELET. Nos. 631, 632. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 6, 7, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. CERTIFICATES FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *294 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins, with whom Mr. Karl W. Kirchwey was on the brief, for the United States. [1] Mr. William D. Guthrie for the yacht owner in this and other cases argued simultaneously herewith. [2] MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court....

# 11
United States v. Billings, Nos. 626 and 67 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1914

232 U.S. 289 (1914) UNITED STATES v. BILLINGS. BILLINGS v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 626 and 67. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 6, 7, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Adkins, with whom Mr. Karl W. Kirchwey was on the brief, for the United States. [1] Mr. William D. Guthrie for the yacht owner in this...

# 12
United States v. Reynolds, Nos. 478 and 479 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 30, 1914

235 U.S. 133 (1914) UNITED STATES v. REYNOLDS. UNITED STATES v. BROUGHTON. Nos. 478, 479. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 23, 1914. Decided November 30, 1914. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. *134 The Solicitor General for the United States. Mr. William L. Martin, with whom Mr. Robert C. Brickell, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, was on the brief, for defendants in error. *138 MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of...

# 13
Baker v. Warner, Nos. 41 and 42 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 05, 1914

231 U.S. 588 (1913) BAKER v. WARNER. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 41, 42. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 5, 1913. Decided December 22, 1913. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *590 Mr. Frank J. Hogan and Mr. Henry E. Davis for plaintiff in error. *591 Mr. W.C. Sullivan and Mr. J.J. Darlington for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court. The plaintiff, who was United States District...

# 14
Pullman Co. v. Knott, Nos. 383, 384 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 02, 1914

235 U.S. 23 (1914) PULLMAN COMPANY v. KNOTT, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 383, 384. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 21, 1914. Decided November 2, 1914. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. *24 Mr. Frank B. Kellogg, with whom Mr. Gustavus S. Fernald and Mr. John E. Hartridge were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Thomas F. West, Attorney General of the State of Florida, for appellee. *25 MR. JUSTICE...

# 15
Kansas Southern Ry. v. Kaw Valley Dist., Nos. 313, 314 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 06, 1914

233 U.S. 75 (1914) KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KAW VALLEY DRAINAGE DISTRICT. KANSAS CITY TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 313, 314. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 19, 20, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. *76 Mr. Samuel W. Moore, with whom Mr. Samuel W. Sawyer and Mr. James M. Souby were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Thomas A. Pollock for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the...

# 16
International Harvester Co. of America v. Kentucky, Nos. 276, 291, 292 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 08, 1914

234 U.S. 216 (1914) INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY OF AMERICA v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 276, 291, 292. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 23, 24, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. Mr. Alexander Pope Humphrey and Mr. Edgar A. Bancroft, with whom Mr. Victor A. Remy was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. James Garnett, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and Mr. Charles Carroll, with whom Mr. Frank E....

# 17
Wilson v. United States, Nos. 168 and 169 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1914

232 U.S. 563 (1914) WILSON, ALIAS CHARLES WILLARD, v. UNITED STATES. WILSON, ALIAS ZOE WILLARD, v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 168, 169. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted October 23, 1913. Decided February 24, 1914. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *564 Mr. Elijah N. Zoline for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Denison for the United States. *565 MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion of the court. This case comes here...

# 18
John II Estate, Ltd. v. Brown, 98 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 07, 1914

235 U.S. 342 (1914) JOHN Ii ESTATE, LIMITED, v. BROWN. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 13, 1914. Decided December 7, 1914. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *343 Mr. Reuben D. Silliman, with whom Mr. Joseph Larocque and Mr. Clarence Blair Mitchell were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. A.A. Wilder, with whom Mr. F.E. Thompson was on the brief, for defendants in error. *345 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court. This case...

# 19
Interstate Com. Comm. v. So. Pac. Co., 98 (1914)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 08, 1914

234 U.S. 315 (1914) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 15, 1914. Decided June 8, 1914. APPEAL FROM THE COMMERCE COURT. Mr. Blackburn Esterline, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom The Solicitor General was on the brief, for the United States. [1] Mr. P.J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission. [1] Mr. Fred H. Wood and Mr. Gardiner Lathrop, with whom Mr. Robert Dunlap, Mr. T.J. Norton,...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer