Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Hecht v. Malley, Nos. 99-101, 119 (1924)

265 U.S. 144 44 S. Ct. 462 68 L. Ed. 949 HECHT et al. v. MALLEY, Former Collector of Internal Revenue. HOWARD et al. v. SAME. HOWARD et al. v. CASEY, Former Acting Collector of Internal Revenue. CROCKER et al. v. MALLEY, Former Collector of Internal Revenue. Nos. 99-101, 119. Argued May 3, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. Mr. Edward F. McClennen, of Boston, Mass., for petitioners Hecht, Howard, and others. Messrs. Harrison M. Davis and Felix Rackemann, both of Boston, Mass., for petitioners Crocker...

# 1
House v. Road Improvement Dist. No. 2 of Conway Cty., Nos. 92 and 93 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 17, 1924

266 U.S. 175 (1924) HOUSE v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2, OF CONWAY COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. HOUSE v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, OF CONWAY COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. Nos. 92 and 93. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 17, 20, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. *176 Mr. Joseph M. Hill, with whom Mr. Henry L. Fitzhugh was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. G.B. Rose and Mr. Lasker Ehrman, with whom Mr. Chas. T. Coleman,...

# 2
Matthew Addy Co. v. United States, Nos. 84, 85 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1924

264 U.S. 239 (1924) MATTHEW ADDY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. FORD v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 84 and 85. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 17, 18, 1923. Decided February 25, 1924. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Mr. Julius R. Samuels, with whom Mr. Nelson B. Cramer was on the briefs, for petitioners. Mr. Geo. Ross Hull, Special Assistant to the Attorney General. for the United States. *240 MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. The...

# 3
Dillingham v. McLaughlin, Nos. 690, 691 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 07, 1924

264 U.S. 370 (1924) DILLINGHAM, AS PRESIDENT, ET AL. v. McLAUGHLIN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. McLAUGHLIN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. DILLINGHAM, AS PRESIDENT, ET AL. Nos. 690 and 691. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 17, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. *371 Mr. Oliver D. Burden, with whom Mr. Terry A. Lyon was on the briefs,...

# 4
United States v. American Ry. Exp. Co., Nos. 666-668 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1924

265 U.S. 425 (1924) UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. SOUTHEASTERN EXPRESS COMPANY v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. SOUTHERN TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY ET AL. Nos. 666-668. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 16, 17, 1924. Decided June 2, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. *426 Mr. Blackburn Esterline, Assistant to the...

# 5
Meek v. Centre County Banking Co., Nos. 590-592 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 21, 1924

264 U.S. 499 (1924) MEEK v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., BANKRUPTS. DALE v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., BANKRUPTS. BREEZE v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., BANKRUPTS. Nos. 590-592. Supreme Court of United States. Motions to dismiss submitted March 10, 1924. argued March 13, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. *500 Mr. Mortimer C. Rhone and Mr. Ellis L. Orvis, with whom Mr. Harry Keller was on the brief, for...

# 6
MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co., Nos. 55, 59 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 17, 1924

266 U.S. 131 (1924) MACKENZIE v. A. ENGELHARD & SONS COMPANY. A. ENGELHARD & SONS COMPANY v. MACKENZIE. Nos. 55 and 59. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 9, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *132 Mr. William Marshall Bullitt, with whom Mr. Samuel B. King was on the brief, for Mackenzie. Mr. J. Verser Conner, with whom Mr. Percy N. Booth was on the brief, for A. Engelhard & Sons Company. *140 MR. JUSTICE HOLMES...

# 7
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall, Nos. 540, 789 (1924)

265 U.S. 196 (1924) PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. KUYKENDALL, AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. Nos. 540 and 789. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 17, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. *197 Mr. Otto B. Rupp, with whom Mr. Frank T. Post, Mr. H.D. Pillsbury, Mr. C.M. Bracelen and Mr. W.V. Tanner were on the briefs, for appellant. Mr. John H. Dunbar, Attorney General of the...

# 8
Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. of Spokane v. Kuykendall, Nos. 539, 790 (1924)

265 U.S. 206 (1924) HOME TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY OF SPOKANE v. KUYKENDALL, AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS OF WASHINGTON, ET AL. Nos. 539 and 790. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 17, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. *207 Mr. Otto B. Rupp, with whom Mr. Frank T. Post, Mr. H.D. Pillsbury, Mr. C.M. Bracelen and Mr. W.V. Tanner were on the briefs, for appellant. Mr. John H. Dunbar, Attorney...

# 9
Brooks-Scanlon Corp. v. United States, Nos. 367, 385 (1924)

265 U.S. 106 (1924) BROOKS-SCANLON CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. BROOKS-SCANLON CORPORATION. Nos. 367, 385. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 8, 1924. Decided May 12, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *107 Mr. John Junell, with whom Mr. William A. Lancaster, Mr. David F. Simpson and Mr. Edward P. Sanborn were on the brief, for Brooks-Scanlon Corporation. *111 Mr. Henry M. Ward, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Chauncey G. Parker and Mr. Alfred A....

# 10
Washington v. WC Dawson & Co., Nos. 366, 684 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 25, 1924

264 U.S. 219 (1924) STATE OF WASHINGTON v. W.C. DAWSON & COMPANY. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. JAMES ROLPH COMPANY ET AL. Nos. 366 and 684. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 8, 9, 1924. Decided February 25, 1924. ERROR TO SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. *220 Mr. John H. Dunbar, Attorney General of the State of Washington, with whom Mr. Raymond W. Clifford, Assistant Attorney...

# 11
Miller v. Robertson, Nos. 35, 145 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 17, 1924

266 U.S. 243 (1924) MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL. v. ROBERTSON. ROBERTSON v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL. Nos. 35 and 145. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 1, 2, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *245 Mr. Lindley M. Garrison, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Adna R. Johnson, Jr., and Mr. Dean Hill Stanley, Special Assistants to the Attorney...

# 12
Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. City and County of San Francisco, Nos. 34-36 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 02, 1924

265 U.S. 403 (1924) PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL. Nos. 34-36. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 17, 1923. Restored for reargument November 27, 1923. Reargued February 19, 1924. Decided June 2, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. *404 Mr....

# 13
Salinger v. Loisel, Nos. 341, 342, 705 (1924)

265 U.S. 224 (1924) SALINGER, JR. v. LOISEL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. SAME v. SAME. SALINGER, JR. v. UNITED STATES, AND LOISEL, AS UNITED STATES MARSHAL, EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 341, 342, 705. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 15, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *225 Mr. B.I....

# 14
Idaho Irrigation Co. v. Gooding, Nos. 324, 336 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1924

265 U.S. 518 (1924) IDAHO IRRIGATION COMPANY, LTD., ET AL. v. GOODING ET AL. GOODING ET AL. v. IDAHO IRRIGATION COMPANY, LTD., ET AL. Nos. 324 and 336. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 11, 14, 1924. Decided June 9, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *519 Mr. Gordon M. Buck, with whom Mr. Raymond J. Scully was on the briefs, for the Idaho Irrigation Company, Ltd. *520 Mr. Harrison Tweed for the Equitable Trust Company of New York et al., Trustees....

# 15
Air-Way Elec. Appliance Corp. v. Day, Nos. 31 and 32 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 20, 1924

266 U.S. 71 (1924) AIR-WAY ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CORPORATION v. DAY, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF OHIO, ET AL. DAY, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF OHIO, ET AL. v. AIR-WAY ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CORPORATION. Nos. 31 and 32. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 30, May 1, 1924. Decided October 20, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *72 Mr. Newton A. Tracy, with whom Mr. Thomas H. Tracy and Mr. George D. Welles were on the briefs, for Air-Way...

# 16
RR Comm. v. Southern Pac. Co., Nos. 283-285 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 07, 1924

264 U.S. 331 (1924) RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY ET AL. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 283-285. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 22, 1923. Decided April 7, 1924. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. *332 Mr. William W. Clary and Mr. Hugh Gordon for...

# 17
Weiss v. Stearn, Nos. 262, 263 (1924)

265 U.S. 242 (1924) WEISS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. STEARN. WEISS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. WHITE. Nos. 262 and 263. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 30, 1924. Decided May 26, 1924. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *243 Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Charles P. Hine, with whom Mr. Amos Burt Thompson was on the brief, for...

# 18
Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co., Nos. 246 and 232 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 20, 1924

266 U.S. 42 (1924) MICHAELSON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES EX REL. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY. SANDEFUR v. CANOE CREEK COAL COMPANY. Nos. 246 and 232. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 9, 10, 1924. Decided October 20, 1924. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *44 Mr. Donald R. Richberg and Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, with whom Mr. John A. Cadigan and Mr. Peter B....

# 19
Chicago Great Western R. Co. v. Kendall, Nos. 22, 23 (1924)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 17, 1924

266 U.S. 94 (1924) CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KENDALL, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF IOWA, ET AL. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. KENDALL, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF IOWA, ET AL. Nos. 22 and 23. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 7, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. *95 Mr. Donald Evans, with whom Mr. Clifford V. Cox and Mr. Wm. F. Riley were on the brief, for appellant in...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer