Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Moya v. DeBaca, 996 M (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 23, 1969

395 U.S. 825 (1969) MOYA ET UX. v. DeBACA, DBA DeBACA & CO. CREDIT & COLLECTION AGENCY, ET AL. No. 996, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 23, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. William G. Fitzpatrick, Jr., for appellants. Claud S. Mann for DeBaca et al., and Boston E. Witt, Attorney General, and James V. Noble, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of New Mexico, appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma...

# 1
Kenneth Herbert Hanna v. United States, 983 (1969)

394 U.S. 1015 89 S. Ct. 1625 23 L. Ed. 2d 42 Kenneth Herbert HANNA, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES. No. 983. Supreme Court of the United States May 5, 1969 Guy Johnson, for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer, for the United States. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 1 Denied. 2 Petitioner asks that we review the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth...

# 2
Cleveland L. Sellers, Jr. v. Melvin R. Laird, Secretary of Defense, 979, Misc (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1969

395 U.S. 950 89 S. Ct. 2022 23 L. Ed. 2d 470 Cleveland L. SELLERS, Jr., petitioner, v. Melvin R. LAIRD, Secretary of Defense, et al. No. 979, Misc. Supreme Court of the United States June 9, 1969 Charles Morgan, Jr., Reber F. Boult, Jr., Howard Moore, Jr., Morris Brown, Melvin L. Wulf, Martin Garbus, and Eleanor Holmes Norton, for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Morton Hollander and Robert V. Zener, for respondents. Petition for writ of certiorari to...

# 3
Jones v. United States, 966, Misc (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jun. 09, 1969

395 U.S. 462 (1969) JONES v. UNITED STATES. No. 966, Misc. Supreme Court of United States. Decided June 9, 1969. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Edward L. Cragen for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Jerome M. Feit, and Robert G. Maysack for the United States. PER CURIAM. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is...

# 4
Local 182, International Brotherhood v. NLRB, 958 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 10, 1969

394 U.S. 213 (1969) LOCAL 182, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 958. Supreme Court of United States. Decided March 10, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. John T. Buckley for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, and Norton J. Come for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers...

# 5
Commissioner v. Shaw-Walker Co., 95 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 27, 1969

393 U.S. 478 (1969) COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SHAW-WALKER CO. No. 95. Supreme Court of United States. Decided January 27, 1969. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Solicitor General Griswold for petitioner. Richard E. Nolan and John P. Carroll, Jr., for respondent. PER CURIAM. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in...

# 6
Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles, 945 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1969

394 U.S. 102 89 S. Ct. 926 22 L. Ed. 2d 112 Eugene HOLDEN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH, City Attorney, Los Angeles, et al. No. 945. Supreme Court of the United States March 3, 1969 Burton Marks, for appellants. Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns, for appellees. PER CURIAM. 1 The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.

# 7
United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission .No. 899. Charles E. Brundage v. United States, 942 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1969

393 U.S. 1077 89 S. Ct. 874 21 L. Ed. 2d 771 UNITED STATES, appellant, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION et al. .no. 899. Charles E. BRUNDAGE et al., appellants, v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 942. 1 CITY OF AUBURN, appellant, 2 v. 3 UNITED STATES et al. 4 No. 999. 5 LIVING TON ANTI-MERGER COMMITTEE, appellant, 6 v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION et al. 7 No. 1003. Supreme Court of the United States February 24, 1969 8 Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Deputy...

# 8
Kohler v. Tugwell, 933 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1969

393 U.S. 531 (1969) KOHLER ET AL. v. TUGWELL, TREASURER OF LOUISIANA, ET AL. No. 933. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Donald V. Organ for appellants. Dorothy Wolbrette and William P. Curry, Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

# 9
The New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company First Mortgage 4% Bondholders Committee v. United States, 915 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 01, 1969

396 U.S. 1056 90 S. Ct. 757 24 L. Ed. 2d 751 The NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY FIRST MORTGAGE 4% BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE, appellant, v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 915. 1 MANUFACTURERS HANOVER TRUST COMPANY, etc., appellant, 2 v. 3 UNITED STATES et al. 4 No. 917. 5 The CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, N. A., etc., appellant, 6 v. 7 UNITED STATES et al. 8 No. 921. 9 The NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY 10 FIRST MORTGAGE 4% BONDHOLDERS COMMITTEE, petitioner, 11 v. Richard...

# 10
Mayhue's Super Liquor Stores, Inc. v. Meiklejohn, 904 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 24, 1969

394 U.S. 319 (1969) MAYHUE'S SUPER LIQUOR STORES, INC. v. MEIKLEJOHN, DIRECTOR, BEVERAGE DEPARTMENT OF FLORIDA, ET AL. No. 904. Supreme Court of United States. Decided March 24, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Daniel S. Pearson for appellant. T. T. Turnbull, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, for appellees. PER CURIAM. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

# 11
United States v. State of Louisiana, 9, Original (1969)

395 U.S. 901 89 S. Ct. 1737 23 L. Ed. 2d 215 UNITED STATES of America, plaintiff, v. State of LOUISIANA et al. No. 9, Original. Supreme Court of the United States May 19, 1969 1 The LOUISIANA BOUNDARY CASE. 2 Pursuant to the opinion of this Court of March 3, 1969, 394 U.S. 11 , 89 S. Ct. 773 , 22 L. Ed. 2d 44 , it is ordered that Walter P. Armstrong, Jr., Esquire, of Memphis, Tennessee, be, and he is hereby, appointed as Special Master in this cause to make a preliminar determination consistent...

# 12
United States v. Louisiana the Louisiana Boundary Case, 9 ORIG (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 21, 1969

394 U.S. 11 89 S. Ct. 773 22 L. Ed. 2d 44 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. LOUISIANA et al. The LOUISIANA BOUNDARY CASE. No. 9, Orig. Argued Oct. 14, 15, 1968. Decided March 3, 1969. Rehearing Denied April 21, 1969. See 394 U.S. 994 , 89 S. Ct. 1451 . [Syllabus from pages 11-13 intentionally omitted] Archibald Cox, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff. Victor A. Sachse, Baton Rouge, La., and J. B. Miller, New Orleans, La., for defendants. Mr. Justice STEWART delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 In...

# 13
United States v. Louisiana, 9 ORIG (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1969

394 U.S. 1 (1969) UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA ET AL. (TEXAS BOUNDARY CASE). No. 9, Orig. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 18, 1968. Decided March 3, 1969. ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR THE ENTRY OF A SUPPLEMENTAL DECREE AS TO THE STATE OF TEXAS. Louis F. Claiborne argued for the United States on its proposed supplemental decree as to the State of Texas. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Martz, Roger P. Marquis, and George S. Swarth. Houghton...

# 14
United States v. Louisiana, 9 ORIG (1969)

394 U.S. 836 (1969) UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA ET AL. (TEXAS BOUNDARY CASE). No. 9, Orig. Supreme Court of United States. Decided May 31, 1960, December 4, 1967, and March 3, 1969. Decree Entered December 12, 1960. Supplemental Decree Entered May 5, 1969. For the purpose of giving effect to the conclusions of this Court as stated in its opinions announced December 4, 1967, and March 3, 1969, supplementing the decree entered herein on December 12, 1960, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed as...

# 15
Shapiro v. Thompson, 9 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 21, 1969

394 U.S. 618 (1969) SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT v. THOMPSON. No. 9. Supreme Court of United States. Argued May 1, 1968. Reargued October 23-24, 1968. Decided April 21, 1969. [*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. *620 Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, argued the cause for appellant in No. 9 on the original argument and on the reargument. With him on the brief on the original argument was Robert K....

# 16
Nacirema Operating Co. v. Johnson, 9 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 15, 1969

396 U.S. 212 (1969) NACIREMA OPERATING CO., INC., ET AL. v. JOHNSON ET AL. No. 9. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 25, 1969. Reargued October 20, 1969. Decided December 9, 1969. [*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Randall C. Coleman argued the cause for petitioners in No. 9 on the original argument and on the reargument. With him on the briefs was William B. Eley. Solicitor General Griswold argued the cause for petitioners in No. 16 on the...

# 17
National Industrial Traffic League v. United States, 898 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1969

393 U.S. 535 (1969) NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 898. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. John F. Donelan, John M. Cleary, Arthur A. Arsham, and John J. C. Martin for appellants. Solicitor General Griswold, Acting Assistant Attorney General Hammond, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., LeGrand A. Carlston,...

# 18
Black Unity League of Ky. v. Miller, 892 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Mar. 03, 1969

394 U.S. 100 (1969) BLACK UNITY LEAGUE OF KENTUCKY ET AL. v. MILLER ET AL. No. 892. Supreme Court of United States. Decided March 3, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Robert Allen Sedler, and Morton Stavis for appellants. W. Scott Miller, Jr., pro se, and for other appellees. PER CURIAM. Appellant organizations brought this suit for injunctive and declaratory relief against investigations which appellees,...

# 19
Baker National Bank v. Henderson, 883 (1969)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 24, 1969

393 U.S. 530 (1969) BAKER NATIONAL BANK v. HENDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX. No. 883. Supreme Court of United States. Decided February 24, 1969. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA. Thomas E. Towe for appellant. PER CURIAM. The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, and MR. JUSTICE WHITE are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer