RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION J. THOMAS RAY , Magistrate Judge . The following Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to United States District Judge Susan Webber Wright. You may file written objections to all or part of this Recommendation. If you do so, those objections must: (1) specifically explain the factual and/or legal basis for your objection; and (2) be received by the Clerk of this Court within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Recommendation. The failure to...
JUDGMENT BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . Consistent with the order entered today, this case is dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . I. Procedures for Filing Objections This Recommendation has been sent to Judge James M. Moody Jr. Any party may file objections. To be considered, objections must be filed within 14 days of filing of the Recommendation. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. Parties who do not object may waive the right to appeal questions of fact. And, if no objections are filed, Judge...
ORDER D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . On de novo review, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Kearney's recommendation, No. 10, and overrules London's objections, No. 12. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and will dismiss her premature complaint without prejudice. So Ordered.
ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. In response to his query (Doc. No. 38), Mr. Laquerre's objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations were received on November 22, 2019 and filed as Document No. 37. The Clerk is directed to send Mr. Laquerre a file-marked copy of his objections. Mr. Laquerre's motion to amend his complaint (Doc. No. 40)...
ORDER LEE P. RUDOFSKY , District Judge . This Court has received a Recommended Disposition (Recommendation) filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. Doc. 19. The parties have not filed objections. After careful review of the Recommendation, this Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to respond to the Court's October 23, 2019...
ORDER JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 25)...
JUDGMENT KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order entered on this date and pursuant to this Court's prior Orders, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that plaintiff Sylvester O. Barbee's complaint is dismissed. The relief requested is denied. It is so adjudged.
ORDER KRISTINE G. BAKER , District Judge . The Court has received the Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome Kearney (Dkt. No. 94). Plaintiff Sylvester O. Barbee filed an objection to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 96). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and Mr. Barbee's objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their...
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . I. Procedure for Filing Objections This Recommended Disposition (Recommendation) has been sent to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. Any party may file objections to this Recommendation if they disagree with its findings or conclusions. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection. To be considered, objections must be received in the office of the Court Clerk within 14 days of this...
JUDGMENT JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to the order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. This dismissal counts as a "strike" and the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
JUDGMENT D.P. MARSHALL, JR. , District Judge . London's premature complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
JUDGMENT JAMES M. MOODY, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to the order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice.
JUDGMENT LEE P. RUDOFSKY , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order filed on December 30, 2019, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Plaintiff David Applewhite's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED.
JUDGMENT BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . Consistent with the Order that was entered on this day, it is CONSIDERED, ORDERED, and ADJUDGED that this case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED.
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION BETH DEERE , Magistrate Judge . I. Procedure for Filing Objections: This Recommended Disposition ("Recommendation") has been sent to Judge Billy Roy Wilson. Either party may file written objections with the Clerk of Court if they disagree with the findings or conclusions set out in the Recommendation. To be considered, however, objections must be filed within 14 days. Objections should be specific and should include the factual or legal basis for the objection....
ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have carefully reviewed the Recommended Disposition (Doc. No. 16) filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. Mr. Settles has not filed objections and the time for doing so has passed. After careful consideration, I adopt the Recommendation in all respects. Petitioner Quinton Settles's initial and amended petitions for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. Nos. 2, 7) are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, Mr. Settles's motion for default judgment (Doc....
ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation in all respects. Accordingly, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 35) is DENIED IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER BRIAN S. MILLER , District Judge . After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe's recommended disposition [Doc. Nos. 146] is adopted, the motions for summary judgment [Doc. No. 134, 141] are granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 1915(a)(3), it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED.
ORDER BILLY ROY WILSON , District Judge . I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendation's in all respects. Accordingly, Voss's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 6) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.
