I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order Pursuant to Rule l(a)(5), of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA 60884-975, Petition of, First Division Design, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mark B. Carter, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60859, Appeal of Infinite Services &, Solutions, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE PETITIONER: Eden Brown Gaines, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. We deem this date reasonable.Accordingly, the Board hereby directs the contracting officer to issue a decision, on the contractor's claim by 10 November 2016.
CLARKE, Administ ative Judge, Armed Services Board, of Contract Appeals, I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60845, Appeal of Ken, Laster Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
, Deputy Chief Trial Attorney, Christopher S. Cole, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60830, Appeal of Advanced Medical, Partners, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael J. Gardner, Esq., Navy Chief Trial Attorney, David B. Stinson, Esq. Unless either party or the Board acts to reinstate, the appeal within one year from the date of this Order, the dismissal shall be deemed with, prejudice.
, Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Steven W. Feldman, Esq., Garry L. Brewer, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60758, Appeal of Gilbane, Federal, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq., Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney, Anna F. Kurtz, Esq.By Order dated 24 August 2016, the Board requested that appellant provide a copy, of the claim it submitted to the contracting officer prior to the filing of this appeal.
Appeal of ), ), Bulldozer Gulf General Trading & ) ASBCA No. 60740, Contracting Co. W.L.L.APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Shabeeb Z., DLA Chief Trial Attorney, Robin Walters, Esq. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed from the Board's docket without, prejudice. See TTF, L.L.C.
THIS IS THE FINAL DECISION OF THE, CONTRACTING OFFICER.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60739, Appeal of Military, Aircraft Parts, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Derek J. Lindenschmidt, Esq., Army Chief Trial Attorney, Robert B. Neill, Esq.It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. ยงยง 7105(e), 7108(b), and the, parties' stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. This amount is inclusive of interest.
APPEARANCES FOR THE PETITIONER: Jeffrey G. Gilmore, Esq. We deem this date reasonable.Accordingly, the Board hereby directs the contracting officer to issue a decision, on the contractor's claim by 30 September 2016.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
FMARK N. STEMPLER, Administrative Judge, Acting Chairman, Armed Services Board, of Contract Appeals, I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60715, Appeal ofL-3, Communications Integrated Systems, L.P.
extension of time request for railings 3 dated 15 March, 2016 4 ; Pursuant to Board Rule l(a)(5), Volmar petitioned the Board, by letter dated, 23 July 2016, for an order directing the CO to issue a decision on its seven remaining, claims no later than a reasonable time set by the Board (pet.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.Appellant's notice of appeal requested the email address of the contracting officer, for this appeal and indicated that it desires to submit its claim to the contracting officer, for a decision.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.By Order dated 21 July 2016, the Board requested that appellant provide a copy of, the claim it had submitted to the contracting officer prior to the filing of this appeal., The Board has not received an objection from either party.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.By Orders dated 28 July 2016 and 15 August 2016, the Board requested that, appellant provide a copy of the claim it had submitted to the contracting officer prior to, the filing of this appeal.
On 12 September 2016, the government moved to dismiss appellant's appeal for, lack of jurisdiction alleging that appellant had failed to submit a claim to a contracting, officer. Both parties have notified the Board that they do, not object to dismissal.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.By Order dated 18 July 2016, the Board requested that appellant provide a copy of, the claim it submitted to the contracting officer prior to the filing of this appeal. The Board, has not received an objection from either party.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.By Order dated 21 July 2016, the Board requested that appellant provide a copy of, the claim it had submitted to the contracting officer prior to the filing of this appeal. The Board has not received an, objection from either party.
