APPEARANCE FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott W. Barber, Esq.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61305, Appeal of Shams Walizada, Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael J. Gardner, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61303, Appeal of TSO Armor and, Training, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Jeffrey S. Frasier, Esq., Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney, Cristopher S. Cole, Esq.It is the Board's decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7IOS(b), and the, parties' joint request, that the appeal is sustained.
If the CO fails to comply, with this Order, such failure will be deemed a decision by the CO denying the claim, and, I, the contractor may appeal to this Board or sue in the United States Court of Federal, Claims pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 7103(f)(5) and 7104.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Raymond A. Peters, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq., Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Anna D. Ross, Esq.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.By Order dated 12 September 2017, the Board requested that appellant provide a, copy of the claim it had submitted to the contracting officer prior to the filing of this, appeal. The Board has not received an, objection from either party.
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Pamela J. Mazza, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas J. Warren, Esq., Acting Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Anna D. Ross, Esq.LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Seth H. Locke, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61242, Appeal of The Boeing, Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
ministrative Judge, Chairman, Armed Services Board, of Contract Appeals, I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61238, Appeal of The Clement, Group, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mark G. Jackson, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61231, Appeal ofChenega, Integrated Mission Support, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Ronald J. Borro, Esq., Navy Chief Trial Attorney, Mark S. Christopher, Esq., David D. Perrone, Esq., Michael S. Roys, Esq. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed by, 11 September 201 7.
Appeals of ), ), Lulus Ostrich Ranch ) ASBCA Nos., Appellant (Lulus Ostrich Ranch) says the government violated procurement rules in its, award of ice delivery contracts to other contractors (app.* The Board lacks, jurisdiction to entertain those bid protest-type claims, which are dismissed.
When the Board did not receive a complaint, pursuant to Board Rule 6(a), it issued an Order, dated 20 July 2017, directing appellant to, file a complaint within 21 days of the date of the Order, or immediately advise the Board, how much more time was needed and why.
When the Board did not receive a complaint, pursuant to Board Rule 6(a), it issued an Order, dated 20 July 2017, directing appellant to, file a complaint within 21 days of the date of the Order, or immediately advise the Board, how much more time was needed and why.
, Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Brett R. Howard, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61207, Appeal of Dover Vantage, Inc., rendered in, conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas L. Tabeling, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq., Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Brett R. Howard, Esq.Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Douglas L. Tabeling, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq., Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Brett R. Howard, Esq.Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.JEFFREY D. GARDIN, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. During a conference call with the parties, appellant informed the Board that, after it filed its notice of appeal, the contracting officer informed appellant that her office, had recently moved and that she never received appellant's claim.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Traeger Machetanz, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61202, Appeal of Bristol, General Contractors, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
