ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Petition of - ) ) Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC ) ASBCA No. 62198-992 ) Under Contract No. N69450-14-C-1756 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE PETITIONER: Brian Stewart, Esq. .Counsel APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jens en, Esq. Navy Chief Trial Attorney Julie C. Riggieri, Esq. Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL On September 25, 2019, Caddell Construction Co. (DE), LLC filed a request under Board Rule l(a)(5) for an order directing the contracting...
This dismissal without, prejudice does not affect Appellant's right to appeal a, contracting officer's final decision regarding Appellant's, termination for convenience claim dated June 13, 2019, or a, subsequent, independent deemed denial appeal of that claim.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mark G. Jackson, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62156, Appeal of Chenega Integrated, Mission Support, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
J, I, I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the, I, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62146, Appeal of, American Best Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's, Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Merrill E. Mead, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62137, Appeal of CenCore, Associates, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
, Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Bryan M. Harrington, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62131, Appeal of Adventus, Technologies Incorporated, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Dustin P. Monokian, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62129, Appeal ofIAP Worldwide, Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of - ) ) Precision Metals Corp. ) ASBCA No. 62126 ) Under Contract No. SPRTAl-12-C-0060 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Tony Figlozzi Vice President APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq. DLA Chief Trial Attorney Edward R. Murray, Esq. Bobby J. Coffman, Esq. Trial Attorneys DLA Aviation Richmond, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: October 29, 2019 dministrative...
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of - ) ) EvolvaAG ) ASBCA Nos. 62110, 62111 ) Under Contract No. HDTRAl-06-C-0029 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: David R. Hazelton, Esq. Kyle R. Jefcoat, Esq. Dean W. Baxtresser, Esq. Latham & Watkins, LLP Washington, DC APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. DCMA Chief Trial Attorney Debra E. Berg, Esq. Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Hanscom AFB, MA ORDER OF DISMISSAL Appellant has requested to withdraw these...
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Hallie H. Gibbs II, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62079, Appeal of Advanced, Cleaning Technologies, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Song Yong Eui, Esq., Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Paul L. Huhtanen, Esq.By Order dated July 1, 2019, the Board advised the parties that the appeal would, be dismissed without prejudice unless either party objected within 14 days of the Order.
APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Robert J. Symon, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62071, Appeal of Turner, Construction Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
reasonable steps to minimize its costs.I, AGR cites, once again, to our holding in Phoenix Data Solutions, as support for, the proposition that an extension does not need to increase the contract's period of, performance to result in unabsorbed overhead ...I, duration in the Phoenix appeal.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.By Order dated August 1, 2019, appellant was directed to show that it is, represented in this appeal by a person who meets the criteria of Board Rule I5(a), or to, designate a proper person as its representative no later than August 15, 2019.
On September 3, 2019, the Board emailed appellant using appellant's business email, address and Mr. Calleson's personal email address, again requesting appellant contact the, Board, but did not receive a reply. This Order was returned to the Board as undeliverable.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62061-990, Petition of Christian &, Sons LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Bryan R. King, Esq.I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed, Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62060, Appeal of Neuber, Environmental Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.This is an appeal from a termination for default, denial of unpaid contract, balance and contract price adjustments, as well as government-assessed reprocurement, costs and damages, by Melville Energy Systems, Inc. (MES or appellant).
APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: A. Clay Rankin, Esq.APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq., Engineer Chief Trial Attorney, Thomas M. Taff, Jr., Esq.PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS, Recorder, Armed Services, Board of Contract Appeals
, C. Kelly Kroll, Esq. In response, by letter dated, May 28, 2019, appellant notified the Board that it wished to withdraw the appeal, and stated, that it intended to file a new claim with the contracting officer to address some of the issues, raised by the government in its motion to dismiss.
