) Paragraph 13 of the confirmation order also states: This Court retains jurisdiction over post confirmation matters as set forth in 11 U.S.C. §§ 1141 to 1146, as required by the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, Local Bankruptcy Rules, or as set forth in the confirmed Plan.
464 B.R. 61 (2006), IN RE HAKE;, BUCKEYE RETIREMENT CO., L.L.C., LTD., v., HAKE., Nos. 06-8007, 04-41352., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Sixth Circuit., September 14, 2006. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION, Affirmed.
I. ISSUES ON APPEAL, Whether the Debtors' proposed Chapter 13 plan, prior to amendment, unfairly discriminated between joint and individual creditors even though the only property available for distribution in a hypothetical Chapter 7 case would be property held as tenants by the entireties.
Neither the parties nor the bankruptcy court cited any cases interpreting this particular exemption. 590, 34 L. Ed. 2d 608 (1973), the issue was whether a state welfare agency could reach exempt federal social security disability benefits funds which had been deposited in a bank account.
The bankruptcy court rejected Tidewater's argument that its prepetition repossession of the Debtor's vehicle changed the parties' respective property rights, thereby prohibiting modification and cram down of Tidewater's secured claim. BAP 1997) (applying Whiting Pools analysis to chapter 13 case);
v., United Producers, Inc. and Producers Credit Corp., Appellees.OPINION, PARSONS, Bankruptcy Judge., Presently before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) is the Appellees' motion for an order dismissing this appeal of the bankruptcy court's plan confirmation orders because of equitable mootness.
350 B.R. 628 (2006), In re Perron, Perron, v., eCast Settlement Corp., Nos. 05-8075, 03-90592., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., October 13, 2006., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
337 B.R. 729 (2006), IN RE WELLMAN., WELLMAN, v., SALT CREEK VALLEY BANK., No. 05-8064, 03-51439., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., January 26, 2006., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
, The issue presented is whether the claims of Petitioning Creditors are subject to bona fide disputes. On July 12, 2004, Spitzer paid MACS $112, 210.98 (check # 13086) for two invoices related to television advertisements MACS placed with WEWS and WKYC. Agency, Inc. v. Avco Broad.
337 B.R. 729 (2006), IN RE DAYTON TITLE AGENCY, INC., DAYTON TITLE AGENCY, INC., v., WHITE FAMILY COMPANIES, INC., No. 05-8029, 99-35768., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., January 26, 2006., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
336 B.R. 600 (2006), IN RE COOK;, COOK, v., TERLECKY, No. 05-8027, 03-67981, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit, January 4, 2006., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
337 B.R. 728 (2006), IN RE BARCLAY., BARCLAY, v., REIMER LORBER CO. LPA., No. 05-8019, 02-50794., United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Sixth Circuit., February 1, 2006., Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
In Britton, the bankruptcy court determined that land sale contracts were analogous to mortgages in that the vendor holds legal title to the land only as security for the payment of the purchase price. See Robert M. Curry James Geoffrey Durham, Ohio Land Contract Law, 19 U. Dayton L.Rev.
, United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit., Educational Credit Management Corporation (ECMC) appeals an order of the bankruptcy court discharging the debtor's student loans as the result of undue hardship pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). Tirch, 409 F.3d at 682.
