Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
United States v. Gilbert M. Morgan, 99-7097 (1974)

491 F.2d 71 160 U.S.App.D.C. 278 UNITED STATES of America v. Gilbert M. MORGAN, Appellant. No. 72-1639. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Feb. 7, 1973. Decided Jan. 25, 1974. Sheldon I. Cohen and Joseph Albert Broderick, Washington, D.C., were on the motion for appellant. Harold H. Titus, Jr., U.S. Atty., John A. Terry, Herbert B. Hoffman, and David G. Larimer, Asst. U.S. Attys., for appellee. Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, and VAN PELT, *...

# 1
Carl H. Alley v. Dodge Hotel, 74-8016 (1974)

501 F.2d 880 163 U.S.App.D.C. 320 Carl H. ALLEY, Petitioner, v. DODGE HOTEL, Respondent. No. 74-8016. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. July 23, 1974. Carl H. Alley, pro se, was on the motion for petitioner. Before FAHY, Senior Circuit Judge, and ROBINSON, Circuit judge. PER CURIAM: 1 This case is before us on a pro se motion under Fed.R.App.P. 24(a) for leave to appeal in forma pauperis the dismissal of an action brought by the movant, Carl H. Alley, against the...

# 2
United States v. Napoleon, 74-2091 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Napoleon 74-2091 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/30/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED *

# 3
Sears, Roebuck and Company v. General Services Administration, Council on Economic Priorities, Intervenor-Plaintiff, 74--1946 (1974)

509 F.2d 527 8 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1296 , 8 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 9827, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 194 SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, Appellant, v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al., Council on Economic Priorities, Intervenor-Plaintiff. No. 74-1946. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Dec. 9, 1974. Lawrence M. Cohen, S. Richard Pincus, Paul J. Cherner, Gerard C. Smetana, Chicago, Ill., Alan Raywid, and Burt A. Braverman, Washington, D.C., were on the pleadings for...

# 4
United States v. Henry Skrypeck and Joan K. Cavanagh, 74-1888 (1974)

505 F.2d 458 164 U.S.App.D.C. 351 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Henry SKRYPECK and Joan K. Cavanagh, Appellants. No. 74-1888. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued Sept. 30, 1974. Decided Oct. 23, 1974, As Amended Oct. 29, 1974. Henry Skrypeck, pro se; Joan K. Cavanagh, pro se; James Drew, Atty. Advisor (appointed by the United States District Court), for appellants. David T. Stitt, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Earl J. Silbert, U.S. Atty., and John A....

# 5
Vietnam Veterans Against the War/winter Soldier Organization, a Non-For-Profit Illinois Corporation v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the Interior, 74-1667 (1974)

506 F.2d 53 164 U.S.App.D.C. 391 VIETNAM VETERANS AGAINST THE WAR/WINTER SOLDIER ORGANIZATION, a Non-for-Profit Illinois corporation, et al. v. Rogers C. B. MORTON, Secretary of the Interior, et al., Appellants. No. 74-1667. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. June 28, 1974, On Appellee's Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Aug. 19, 1974. Earl J. Silbert, U.S. Atty., John A. Terry, Arnold T. Aikens and Gil Zimmerman, Asst. U.S. Atty., for appellants. Leonard H. Becker,...

# 6
United States v. Brown, 74-1626 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Brown 74-1626 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/17/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED *

# 7
Consumers Union of United States, Inc., San Francisco Consumer Action v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 74-1620 (1974)

505 F.2d 475 164 U.S.App.D.C. 368 Consumers Union of United States, Inc., San Francisco Consumer Action v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System 74-1620 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 11/27/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 REMANDED * * The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment. Such memorandum is not included with the opinions of the Court that are printed, and it may not be cited in briefs or memoranda of counsel as precedents, under...

# 8
United States v. Williams, 74-1496 (1974)

495 F.2d 1076 162 U.S.App.D.C. 20 U. S. v. Williams 74-1496 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 5/30/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

# 9
John N. Mitchell v. Honorable John J. Sirica, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 74-1492 (1974)

502 F.2d 375 163 U.S.App.D.C. 373 John N. MITCHELL et al., Petitioners, v. Honorable John J. SIRICA, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Respondent. No. 74-1492. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. June 7, 1974, Dissenting Opinion July 9, 1974, Certiorari Denied July 25, 1974, See 94 S. Ct. 3232 . Plato Cacheris, Washington, D.C., for John N. Mitchell. Edmund D. Campbell, Washington, D.C., for Kenneth Wells Parkinson. John M. Bray,...

# 10
United States v. Ford, 74-1469 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Ford 74-1469, 74-1627 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/17/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED *

# 11
Raymond L. Reese v. United States Board of Parole, 74-1465 (1974)

498 F.2d 698 162 U.S.App.D.C. 156 Raymond L. REESE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF PAROLE et al. No. 74-1465. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. May 10, 1974. Before BASTIAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MacKINNON, Circuit judge. PER CURIAM: 1 This matter involves the proper jurisdiction for a habeas corpus proceeding. We remand the case to the District Court with instructions to transfer same to the District of Arizona where the petitioner is incarcerated. 2...

# 12
United States v. Brown, 74-1449 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Brown 74-1449 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/19/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

# 13
United States v. Griffith, 74-1447 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Griffith 74-1447 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/20/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

# 14
United States v. Robinson, 74-1444 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Robinson 73-1630, 74-1444 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/30/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED *

# 15
United States v. Butler, 74-1413 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Butler 74-1413 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/3/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

# 16
Dormu v. Powell, 74-1407 (1974)

506 F.2d 1321 165 U.S.App.D.C. 282 Dormu v. Powell 74-1407 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/11/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

# 17
Delevay v. Gresham, 74-1390 (1974)

506 F.2d 1321 165 U.S.App.D.C. 282 DeLevay v. Gresham 74-1390 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/6/74 1 D.C.D.C. AFFIRMED

# 18
United States v. Claggett, 74-1376 (1974)

506 F.2d 1322 165 U.S.App.D.C. 283 U. S. v. Claggett 74-1376 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 12/17/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED *

# 19
United States v. Duncan, 74-1374 (1974)

505 F.2d 476 164 U.S.App.D.C. 369 U. S. v. Duncan 74-1374 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS District of Columbia Circuit 11/15/74 1 D.C.D.C. 2 AFFIRMED * * The judgment or order is accompanied by a Memorandum explanatory of the judgment. Such memorandum is not included with the opinions of the Court that are printed, and it may not be cited in briefs or memoranda of counsel as precedents, under local rule

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer