Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
ROWE v. BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY, 218 A.3d 784 (2019)
Supreme Court of New Jersey Filed:NJ Sep. 11, 2019 Citations: 218 A.3d 784, 081602, A-16 September Term 2018

JUSTICE PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. Pursuant to the Comparative Negligence Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1 to -5.8, and the Joint Tortfeasors Contribution Law, N.J.S.A. 2A:53A-1 to -5, a defendant may seek the allocation of a percentage of fault to a codefendant with whom the plaintiff has settled. Krzykalski v. Tindall , 232 N.J. 525 , 534-37, 181 A.3d 981 (2018); Young v. Latta , 123 N.J. 584 , 593-96, 589 A.2d 1020 (1991). If the factfinder assigns a percentage of...

# 1
DIMITRAKOPOULOS v. BORRUS, GOLDIN, FOLEY, VIGNUOLO, HYMAN AND STAHL, P.C., 203 A.3d 133 (2019)
Supreme Court of New Jersey Filed:NJ Mar. 07, 2019 Citations: 203 A.3d 133, 080357., A-46 September Term 2017

JUSTICE PATTERSON delivered the opinion of the Court. The entire controversy doctrine "seeks to impel litigants to consolidate their claims arising from a single controversy whenever possible." Thornton v. Potamkin Chevrolet , 94 N.J. 1 , 5, 462 A.2d 133 (1983) (quoting Alfone v. Sarno , 87 N.J. 99 , 113, 432 A.2d 857 (1981) (internal quotation marks omitted) ). The doctrine serves "to encourage complete and final dispositions through the avoidance of piecemeal decisions and to...

# 2
KAMINSKAS v. DEPT. OF LAW, 200 A.3d 389 (2019)
Supreme Court of New Jersey Filed:NJ Jan. 17, 2019 Citations: 200 A.3d 389, A-31 September Term 2017 080128.

JUSTICE FERNANDEZ-VINA delivered the opinion of the Court. Lieutenant John Kaminskas and Chief Daniel Vaniska, who were both members of the Union County Police Department, requested defense and indemnification by the Office of the Attorney General (Attorney General) in a civil action brought against them for alleged investigatory and prosecutorial misconduct. The Attorney General denied their request on the basis that it is a county's duty, under N.J.S.A. 40A:14-117, to defend and...

# 3

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer