32 U.S. 220 (_) 7 Pet. 220 WILLIAM YEATON AND OTHERS, APPELLANTS v. DAVID LENOX AND OTHERS. Supreme Court of United States. Mr Coxe, for the appellees. Mr Neale, contra. Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. *221 In this case a decree was pronounced by the court of the United States for the county of Alexandria in December 1829, from which the defendants in that court appealed, but did not bring up the record. At January term 1832, the appellees, in pursuance of a rule...
32 U.S. 464 7 Pet. 464 8 L. Ed. 749 WILLIAM TYRELL'S HEIRS, Plaintiffs in error, v. ANDREW ROUNTREE and others. January Term, 1833 1 ERROR to the Circuit Court of West Tennessee. An ejectment was brought by the plaintiffs in error, to September term 1830, in the circuit court of West Tennessee, for the recovery of a tract of land, which, in the lifetime of the ancestor of the plaintiffs, had been taken in execution, and sold by the sheriff, to satisfy a debt for which judgment had been obtained...
32 U.S. 633 (_) 7 Pet. 633 GEORGE W. WARD, AND RICHARD K. CALL, REGISTER AND RECEIVER (U.S.), APPELLANTS v. LEWIS GREGORY. SAME, APPELLANTS v. JACOB ROBINSON AND F. SWEARINGEN. Supreme Court of United States. Mr White moved to dismiss these cases, on the grounds that the proceedings were at law in the courts of the United States for the territory of Florida, and that they had been brought up from the court of appeals of that territory, by appeals instead of by writs of error. On the 13th...
32 U.S. 252 (_) 7 Pet. 252 HARLES VATTIER, APPELLANT v. THOMAS S. HINDE, JAMES B. HINDE, MARTHA HINDE, AND JOHN M. HINDE, INFANTS &c. Supreme Court of United States. *254 The case was argued by Mr Caswell for the appellant: and by Mr Ewing and Mr Clay for the appellee. Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. This suit was originally brought in the court of the United States for the seventh circuit and district of Ohio, sitting in chancery, by Thomas S. Hinde and Belinda...
32 U.S. 150 (_) 7 Pet. 150 THE UNITED STATES v. GEORGÉ WILSON. Supreme Court of United States. *155 The case was argued for the United States, by Mr Taney, attorney-general; no counsel appeared for the defendant, George Wilson. *158 Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. In this case the grand jury had found an indictment against the prisoner for robbing the mail, to which he had pleaded not guilty. Afterwards, he withdrew this plea, and pleaded guilty. On a motion by the...
32 U.S. 132 (_) 7 Pet. 132 THE UNITED STATES v. ABEL TURNER. Supreme Court of United States. *133 The case was argued by the attorney-general, for the United States; no counsel appeared for the defendant. *134 Mr Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court. This cause comes before the court upon a certificate of division of opinion of the judges of the circuit court for the district of North Carolina. The defendant, Abel Turner, was indicted for the forgery of, and an attempt to pass, &c....
32 U.S. 164 7 Pet. 164 8 L. Ed. 645 UNITED STATES v. SAMUEL BREWSTER. January Term, 1833 1 CERTIFICATE of Division from the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 2 At the circuit court, in October 1832, an indictment was found against the defendant, containing two counts. The first, that on the 8th day of May 1832, he, unlawfully and feloniously, did sell, utter and deliver a false, forged and counterfeited bill, in imitation of a bill issued by order of the president and...
32 U.S. 18 (_) 7 Pet. 18 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. ELEAZAR W. RIPLEY. Supreme Court of United States. *21 The case was argued, for the plaintiffs in error, by Mr Taney, attorney-general of the United States; no counsel appeared for the defendant in error. *23 Mr Justice M'LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court. The United States have brought this writ of error, to reverse a judgment of the court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana. An action was brought...
32 U.S. 51 (_) 7 Pet. 51 THE UNITED STATES, APPELLANTS v. JUAN PERCHEMAN, APPELLEE. Supreme Court of United States. *59 The case was argued by Mr Tancy, attorney-general, for the United States; and by Mr White, for the appellee. *82 Mr Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court. This is an appeal from a decree pronounced by the judge of the superior court for the district of East Florida, confirming the title of the appellee to two thousand acres of land lying in that territory,...
32 U.S. 138 (_) 7 Pet. 138 THE UNITED STATES, v. JOHN B. MILLS. Supreme Court of United States. *140 The case was argued for the United States by the attorney-general, Mr Taney; no counsel appeared for the defendant. Mr Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court. The defendant was indicted in the circuit court of the United States for the district of North Carolina, under the twenty-fourth section of the act of 1825, entitled "an act to reduce *141 into one, the several acts...
32 U.S. 1 (_) 7 Pet. 1 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. GEORGE MACDANIEL. Supreme Court of United States. *7 The case was argued by Mr Taney, attorney-general, for the United States; and by Mr Coxe and Mr Jones, for the defendant. *10 Mr Justice M'LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court. A writ of error is prosecuted in this case, by the United States, to recover a judgment of the circuit court for the district of Columbia. The action was brought by the government to recover from the...
32 U.S. 28 (_) 7 Pet. 28 THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. THOMAS FILLEBROWN, JUN. Supreme Court of United States. *37 The case was argued by Mr Taney, attorney-general, for the United States; and by Mr Coxe and Mr Jones, for the defendant. *42 Mr. Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This case comes before the court on a writ of error to the circuit court of the district of Columbia. The action was brought to recover a balance certified at the treasury against the...
32 U.S. 453 (_) 7 Pet. 453 IN THE MATTER OF THE UNITED STATES v. EIGHTY-FOUR BOXES OF SUGAR, TUFTS AND CLARKE CLAIMANTS. Supreme Court of United States. *455 The case was argued by Mr Mayer, for the appellants; and by Mr Taney, attorney-general, for the United States. *458 Mr Justice M'LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court. This case is brought before the court, by an application for a mandamus to be directed to the judge of the court of the United States for the district of Louisiana,...
32 U.S. 287 (_) 7 Pet. 287 UNION BANK OF GEORGETOWN v. GEORGE B. MAGRUDER Supreme Court of United States. For the plaintiffs in error, Mr. Key cited, Wynn v. Thornton. Mr Coxe, for the defendant in error. Mr Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court. This cause was formerly before the court upon a writ of error to the circuit court of the district of Columbia, sitting for the county of Washington. The judgment then rendered was reversed (Magruder v. Union Bank of Georgetown, 3 Peters's...
32 U.S. 399 7 Pet. 399 8 L. Ed. 727 THOMAS DEYE OWINGS and others, Appellants, v. ANDREW KINCANNON, Appellee. January Term, 1833 APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Kentucky. In the circuit court, Andrew Kincannon, the appellee, filed a bill, on the 28th of December 1815, claiming a tract of land, by virtue of a prior entry to that under which the persons named in the bill asserted a title to, and held possession of the land; and praying the court to compel the defendants to release all claim to...
32 U.S. 651 7 Pet. 651 8 L. Ed. 816 STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Complainant, v. STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. January Term, 1833 1 MR. Robbins , solicitor for the complainant, having renewed his motion of last term, in this case, prayed the court to award such process, and in such form, as the court may deem proper. 2 ON consideration of the motion made in this case, it is now here ordered by the court that process of subpoena be and the same is hereby awarded, as prayed for by the complainant, and that...
32 U.S. 292 (_) 7 Pet. 292 JOSEPH SHAW, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. JOSEPH COOPER. Supreme Court of United States. *299 The case was submitted to the court, on printed arguments, by Mr Paine, for the plaintiff in error; and Mr Emmet, for the defendant. *310 Mr Justice M'LEAN delivered the opinion of the Court. This writ of error brings before this court, for its revision, a judgment of the circuit court of the United States for the southern district of New York. An action was brought in the circuit...
32 U.S. 596 (_) 7 Pet. 596 RICHARD M. SCOTT, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR v. EZRA LUNT'S ADMINISTRATOR. Supreme Court of United States. *602 The case was argued by Mr Swann, for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr Jones, for the defendant. Mr Justice STORY delivered the opinion of the Court. This cause comes before us upon a writ of error to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, sitting in Alexandria. The original suit is an action of covenant brought by Scott, as assignee, to recover the amount...
32 U.S. 586 (_) 7 Pet. 586 JOSHUA SCHOLEFIELD AND JOHN TAYLOR, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR v. JESSE EICHELBERGER, SURVIVING PARTNER OF JOHN CLEMM, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. Supreme Court of United States. *590 The case was argued by Mr Donaldson and Mr Taney, for the plaintiffs in error; for the defendant, a printed argument was submitted to the court by Mr R. Johnson and Mr R.B. Magruder. *592 Mr Justice JOHNSON delivered the opinion of the Court. The action here is assumpsit to recover the balance of an...
32 U.S. 222 (_) 7 Pet. 222 BERNARDO SAMPEYREAC AND JOSEPH STEWART, APPELLANTS v. THE UNITED STATES, APPELLEES. Supreme Court of United States. *225 The case was argued by Mr Prentiss and Mr White, for the appellants; and by Mr Fulton and Mr Taney, the attorney-general, for the United States. *234 Mr Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court. This case comes up on appeal from the superior court in the territory of Arkansas. The decree of the court was founded upon proceedings...
