Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of the United States

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Roby v. Colehour, Nos. 987-990 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 07, 1892

146 U.S. 153 13 S. Ct. 47 36 L. Ed. 922 ROBY v. COLEHOUR et al. Nos. 987-990. November 7, 1892. Statement by Mr. Justice HARLAN: John M. Palmer, for plaintiff in error. H. S. Monroe and W. C. Goudy, for defendants in error. Mr. Justice HARLAN, after stating the facts in the foregoing language, delivered the opinion of the court. 1 The principal facts appearing upon the present motion to dismiss these writs of error for want of jurisdiction in this court, or to affirm the decrees, are as follows:...

# 1
United States v. Southern Pacific R. Co., Nos. 921, 922 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 12, 1892

146 U.S. 570 (1892) UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 921, 922. [1] Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 10, 1892. Decided December 12, 1892. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. *574 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Maury for appellant. Mr. Joseph H. Call, special attorney on behalf of the United States, filed a brief for appellant. Mr. James C. Carter...

# 2
United States v. Colton Marble & Lime Co., Nos. 862, 863 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 12, 1892

146 U.S. 615 (1892) UNITED STATES v. COLTON MARBLE AND LIME COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 862, 863. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 10, 1892. Decided December 12, 1892. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. *616 Mr. Assistant Attorney General Maury for appellant. Mr. James C. Carter for appellees. MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. The...

# 3
Scott v. Armstrong, Nos. 53, 1,025 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 12, 1892

146 U.S. 499 (1892) SCOTT v. ARMSTRONG. FARMERS' AND MERCHANTS' STATE BANK v. ARMSTRONG. Nos. 53, 1025. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 18, 21, 1892. Decided December 12, 1892. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *503 Mr. William Worthington, (with whom was Mr. J.W. Warrington on the brief,) for plaintiffs in error and appellants. Mr. J.W. Herron, for...

# 4
United States v. Dunnington, Nos. 51, 52 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 05, 1892

146 U.S. 338 (1892) UNITED STATES v. DUNNINGTON. DUNNINGTON v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 51, 52. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 18, 1892. Decided December 8, 1892. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *340 Mr. George A. King (with whom was Mr. Charles W. Hornor on the brief) for Dunnington's heirs. Mr. Solicitor General for the United States. *343 MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court. *344 This was a proceeding by the heirs at...

# 5
Illinois Central R. Co. v. Illinois, Nos. 419, 608, 609 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 05, 1892

146 U.S. 387 (1892) ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. ILLINOIS. CHICAGO v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. ILLINOIS v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 419, 608, 609. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 12, 13, 14, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *414 Mr. Benjamin F. Ayer for the Illinois Central Railroad Company. Mr. John S. Miller for the City of Chicago. Mr. John N. Jewett...

# 6
Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Mike & Starr Gold & Silver Mining Co., Nos. 2, 3 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 29, 1892

143 U.S. 394 (1892) IRON SILVER MINING COMPANY v. MIKE AND STARR GOLD AND SILVER MINING COMPANY. No. 2. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 20, 23, 1891. Decided February 29, 1892. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. *399 Mr. L.S. Dixon and Mr. Ashley Pond for plaintiff in error. Mr. James McKeen and Mr. Frank W. Owers were on their brief. Mr. T.M. Patterson for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE BREWER delivered the opinion of the court. This...

# 7
Chicago & Northwestern R. Co. v. Osborne, Nos. 1,238, 1,239 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 05, 1892

146 U.S. 354 (1892) CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. OSBORNE. SAME v. JUNOD. Nos. 1238, 1239. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 21, 1892. Decided December 5, 1892. ORIGINAL. *355 Mr. C.C. Nourse for the petitioners. Mr. W.C. Goudy opposing. THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the eighth circuit are denied. McLish v. Roff, 141 U.S. 661 ; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U.S. 197 ; Meagher v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing...

# 8
Campbell v. O'Neill, Nos. 1,220-1,231 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 11, 1892

149 U.S. 767 13 S. Ct. 1044 37 L. Ed. 958 CAMPBELL v. O'NEILL. SAME v. QUIGLEY. SAME v. HOFFMAN. SAME v. OLIVER. SAME v. BEATTIE. SAME v. SANDERS. SAME v. GRIMKE. SAME v. OLIVER. SAME v. REHKOPF. SAME v. PETERSON. SAME v. DOTHAGE. SAME v. LAFFAN. Nos. 1,220-1,231. November 11, 1892. 1 No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, on motion of A. G. Riddle, for defendants in error.

# 9
Roby v. Colehour, 990, 987, 988, 989 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Nov. 07, 1892

146 U.S. 153 (1892) ROBY v. COLEHOUR AND ANOTHER. ROBY v. COLEHOUR. ROBY v. COLEHOUR AND ANOTHER. ROBY v. COLEHOUR AND ANOTHER. Nos. 990, 987, 988, 989. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted May 2, 1892. Decided November 7, 1892. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. *154 Mr. Henry S. Monroe and Mr. William C. Goudy for the motions. Mr. John M. Palmer opposing. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. The principal facts appearing upon the present motion to...

# 10
United States v. Des Moines Nav. & R. Co., 987 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 11, 1892

142 U.S. 510 (1892) UNITED STATES v. DES MOINES NAVIGATION AND RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 987. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 18, 19, 1891. Decided January 11, 1892. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. *519 Mr. Attorney General for the United States, appellant. Mr. C.H. Gatch for all the appellees except the Des Moines Navigation and Railway Company. Mr. William Connor was with him on the brief. Mr. Benton J. Hall for the Des Moines...

# 11
Pacific Express Co. v. Seibert, 983 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 04, 1892

142 U.S. 339 (1892) PACIFIC EXPRESS COMPANY v. SEIBERT. No. 983. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 9, 1891. Decided January 4, 1892. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. *343 Mr. Westel W. Morsman for appellant. Mr. John M. Wood, Attorney General of the State of Missouri, for appellees. *348 MR. JUSTICE LAMAR delivered the opinion of the court. According to the view we take of the case, it is not necessary to inquire into the...

# 12
Schwab v. Berggren, 977 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 29, 1892

143 U.S. 442 (1892) SCHWAB v. BERGGREN. No. 977. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 21, 26, 1892. Decided February 29, 1892. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. *443 Mr. Benjamin F. Butler and Mr. M. Salomen for appellant. Mr. George Hunt, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, (with whom was Mr. E.S. Smith on the brief,) for appellee. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. This is an appeal from an order...

# 13
Ficklen v. Shelby County Taxing Dist., 97 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Apr. 11, 1892

145 U.S. 1 (1892) FICKLEN v. SHELBY COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 18, 21, 1892. Decided April 11, 1892. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. *7 Mr. W. Hallett Phillips for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Henry Craft filed a brief for plaintiffs in error. Mr. S.P. Walker for defendant in error. *19 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. In Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing District, 120 U.S. 489...

# 14
Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comm'rs, 912 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Dec. 19, 1892

146 U.S. 646 (1892) YESLER v. WASHINGTON HARBOR LINE COMMISSIONERS. No. 912. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 24, 25, 1892. Decided December 19, 1892. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. *653 Mr. Thomas R. Shepard and Mr. A.H. Garland for plaintiff in error. Mr. Andrew F. Burleigh and Mr. Charles E. Shepard were on Mr. Shepard's brief. Mr. W.C. Jones, Attorney General of the State of Washington, for defendants in error. Mr. John H. Mitchell and Mr. Beriah Brown,...

# 15
Fielden v. Illinois, 909 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Feb. 29, 1892

143 U.S. 452 (1892) FIELDEN v. ILLINOIS. No. 909. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 21, 26, 1892. Decided February 29, 1892. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Mr. Benjamin F. Butler and Mr. M. Salomon for plaintiff in error. Mr. George Hunt, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, (with whom was Mr. E.S. Smith on the brief,) for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. *453 The judgment of the Supreme Court of Illinois,...

# 16
Stutsman County v. Wallace, 89 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 04, 1892

142 U.S. 293 (1892) STUTSMAN COUNTY v. WALLACE. No. 89. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 13, 1891. Decided January 4, 1892. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. *296 *297 Mr. John F. Dillon for appellant. Mr. Harry Hubbard was with him on the brief. *298 Mr. W.E. Dodge (with whom were Mr. J.H. Baldwin, Mr. D.B. Kurtz and Mr. John S. Watson on the brief) for appellees. *305 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court....

# 17
Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROAD, 889 (1892)

145 U.S. 263 (1892) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. No. 889. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 17, 18, 1892. Decided May 16, 1892. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *269 *270 Mr. Samuel Shellabarger and Mr. Alfred G. Safford (with whom were Mr. Attorney General and Mr. J.M. Wilson on the brief) for appellant. Mr. John K. Cowen and Mr. Hugh L. Bond, Jr., for appellee. *275 MR. JUSTICE BROWN...

# 18
Doon Township v. Cummins, 883 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Jan. 04, 1892

142 U.S. 366 (1892) DOON TOWNSHIP v. CUMMINS. No. 883. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 6, 1891. Decided January 4, 1892. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. *369 Mr. B.F. Kauffman, Mr. A. Van Wagenen, Mr. H.T. McMillan and Mr. N.T. Guernsey for plaintiff in error. Mr. J.H. Swann, Mr. M.B. Davis and Mr. W.E. Gantt for defendant in error. *370 MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The...

# 19
CINCINNATI &C. CO. v. Grand Rapids Deposit Co., 872 (1892)
Supreme Court of the United States Filed: Oct. 31, 1892

146 U.S. 54 (1892) CINCINNATI SAFE AND LOCK COMPANY v. GRAND RAPIDS SAFETY DEPOSIT COMPANY. No. 872. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted October 17, 1892. Decided October 31, 1892. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. *55 Mr. Charles B. Wilby and Mr. Gustavus H. Wald for the motion. Mr. John F. Follett and Mr. T.H. Kelley, opposing. THE CHIEF JUSTICE: Judgment was rendered in this case by the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer