179 U.S. 646 (1901) DOOLEY v. HADDEN. HADDEN v. DOOLEY. Nos. 96, 99. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 9, 12, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *649 Mr. William B. Putney and Mr. Henry B. Twombly for the Haddens. Mr. Edward Winslow Paige for Dooley. *650 MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court. Whether Chaffee, as president and general manager of the silk company, had...
181 U.S. 29 (1901) INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CLYDE STEAMSHIP COMPANY. SAME v. WESTERN AND ATLANTIC RAILROAD COMPANY. SAME v. CLYDE STEAMSHIP COMPANY. Nos. 68, 69, 70. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 5, 6, 1900. Decided April 8, 1901. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Mr. L.A. Shaver for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Beck was on his brief. Mr. Edward Baxter for appellees. MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court. *30...
182 U.S. 221 (1901) GOETZE v. UNITED STATES. CROSSMAN v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 340 and 515. Supreme Court of United States. The two were decided together May 27, 1901. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Mr. Edward C. Perkins and Mr. Everit Brown for appellant in No. 340. Mr. J.B. Henderson also filed a brief for same. Mr. E. Ham, Mr. Alexander Porter Morse and Mr. Charles F. Manderson filed a brief in this case on behalf of industrial...
181 U.S. 610 (1901) AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 225, 236. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 12, 1901. Decided May 20, 1901. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. H.B. Closson for the Sugar Refining Company. Mr. John E. Parsons was on his brief. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for the United States. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. These two cases...
181 U.S. 481 (1901) BARKER v. HARVEY. QUEVAS v. HARVEY. Nos. 209, 210. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 20, 21, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. *486 Mr. Shirley C. Ward and Mr. Assistant Attorney General Hoyt for plaintiffs in error. Mr. David L. Withington for defendants in error. Mr. Stephen M. White, Mr. Charles Monroe and Mr. Cassius Carter were on his brief. MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of...
181 U.S. 68 (1901) BROWNE v. CHAVEZ. BROWNE v. CHAVEZ. Nos. 165 and 247. Supreme Court of United States. Argued March 6, 1901. Decided April 8, 1901. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. *70 Mr. William B. Childers for plaintiff in error and appellant. Mr. Bernard S. Rodey for defendant in error and appellee. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. The writ of scire facias has been, among other things, customarily used to obtain...
183 U.S. 483 22 S. Ct. 165 46 L. Ed. 289 CHARLES C. McCHORD, James F. Dempsey, and John C. Wood, Appts. , v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS, & TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. CHARLES C. McCHORD, James F. Dempsey, and John C. Wood, Appts. , v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. CHARLES C. McCHORD, James F. Dempsey, and John C. Wood, Appts. , v. LOUISVILLE, HENDERSON, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. CHARLES C. McCHORD, James F. Dempsey, and John C. Wood, Appts. , v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY....
180 U.S. 250 (1901) In re DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, No. 1. In re DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, No. 2. Nos. 13 and 14, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 21, 1901. Decided February 11, 1901. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Mr. Robert A. Howard for the District of Columbia, petitioner. Mr. A.A. Hoehling, Jr., by leave of court, filed a brief in bealf of certain interested parties. *251 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. These are petitions for mandamus. The...
179 U.S. 622 (1901) BOARD OF LIQUIDATION OF NEW ORLEANS v. LOUISIANA. DRAINAGE COMMISSION OF NEW ORLEANS v. WILDER. Nos. 114, 119. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 4, 5, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. *636 Mr. Branch K. Miller for the Board of Liquidation of the City Debt. Mr. Chester J. Theard for the Drainage Company. Mr. Arthur McGuirk and Mr. Henry L. Lazarus were on his brief. Mr. William Wirt Howe and Mr. Walker B....
180 U.S. 49 (1901) QUEEN OF THE PACIFIC. No. 130. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted December 14, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *51 Mr. Thomas B. Reed for the Pacific Coast Steamship Company. Mr. Milton Andros for the Bancroft-Whitney Company and others. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. The Court of Appeals in its opinion dwelt upon several...
180 U.S. 126 (1901) DOOLEY v. PEASE. No. 97. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 12, 1900. Decided January 21, 1901. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. *127 Mr. Edward Winslow Paige for plaintiff in error. Mr. Lockwood Honore for defendant in error. Mr. A.W. Green and Mr. F. Peters were on his brief. MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court. Among other questions passed upon by the Circuit Court was whether the alleged sale of goods by the...
180 U.S. 72 (1901) THOMPSON v. LOS ANGELES FARMING AND MILLING COMPANY. No. 87. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted November 8, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Mr. Harvey M. Friend for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Stephen M. White and Mr. James H. Shankland for defendant in error submitted on their brief. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action of ejectment in which defendant in error was...
180 U.S. 92 (1901) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. ROBINSON. No. 86. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 7, 8, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *93 Mr. Andrew B. Duvall for plaintiff in error. Mr. Clarence A. Brandenburg was on his brief. Mr. Conway Robinson and Mr. Walter D. Davidge for defendants in error. Mr. Leigh Robinson and Mr. Conway Robinson, Jr., were on their brief. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court....
180 U.S. 132 (1901) LIVERPOOL AND LONDON AND GLOBE INSURANCE COMPANY v. KEARNEY. No. 85. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted November 7, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *133 Mr. E.S. Quinton for plaintiff in error. Mr. A.C. Cruce and Mr. W.I. Cruce for defendants in error. *134 MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. This action was brought to recover the amount alleged to be due on two policies of fire insurance...
181 U.S. 562 (1901) MARKS v. SHOUP. No. 82. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted February 28, 1901. Decided May 13, 1901. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. Mr. W.W. Dudley and Mr. L.T. Michener for plaintiff in error. Mr. W.E. Crews and Mr. J.H. Cobb were on their brief. Mr. S.M. Stockslager, Mr. George C. Heard and Mr. Arthur K. Delaney for defendant in error. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. This is an action for damages,...
183 U.S. 619 22 S. Ct. 268 46 L. Ed. 357 MIDWAY COMPANY, Plff. in Err. , v. FRANK W. EATON, Leonidas Merritt, Merrill M. Clark, Richard H. Fagan, and Margaretha Lonstorf. No. 81. October Term, 1901. Messrs . Walter Ayers and P. H. Seymour for plaintiff in error. Messrs . Jed L. Washburn, Luther C. Harris, Charles A. Towne , and William D. Bailey for defendant in error. Mr. Justice McKenna delivered the opinion of the court: 1 This action was brought by the Germania Iron Company against the...
188 U.S. 375 23 S. Ct. 334 47 L. Ed. 508 JOHN FRANCIS, Anthony Hoff, and John Edgar, alias Peter Edgar, Retitioners , v. UNITED STATES. No. 80. Argued October 16, 17, 1901. Ordered for reargument before full bench November 10, 1902. Reargued December 15, 16, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Messrs. Miller Outcalt, George F. Edmunds, and Thomas F. Shay for petitioners on original argument. Messrs. Miller Outcalt and John G. Carlisle for petitioners on reargument. Assistant Attorney General Beck...
180 U.S. 28 21 S. Ct. 251 45 L. Ed. 410 ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, Appt. , v. WIRT ADAMS. No. 77. Argued October 24, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. This was a bill in equity filed by the railroad company, an Illinois corporation, against Wirt Adams, revenue agent, a citizen of the state of Mississippi, the railroad commission of that state, and the Canton, Aberdeen, & Nashville Railroad Company, a corporation of the state of Mississippi, to enjoin the railroad commission from approving...
180 U.S. 343 (1901) UNITED STATES v. BEEBE. No. 71. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 6, 7, 1900. Decided February 25, 1901. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *348 Mr. W.S. Reese, Jr., and Mr. Robert A. Howard for appellants. Mr. Solicitor General was on their brief. Mr. Alexander Troy and Mr. Henry S. Cattell for appellees, except the Henshaw heirs. Mr. W.A. Gunter filed a brief for the Henshaw heirs. MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the above...
182 U.S. 562 (1901) FULLER v. UNITED STATES. No. 7. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted April 15, 1901. Decided May 27, 1901. ORIGINAL APPLICATION FOR MANDAMUS. Mr. Richard B. Shepard, Mr. Harrison O. Shepard and Mr. William T. Hutchings, for petitioner, submitted on their brief. *563 Mr. James Hagerman for respondent. Mr. Clifford L. Jackson and Mr. Joseph M. Bryson were on his brief. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. Orange Fuller, assignee of Butler...
