219 U.S. 339 31 S. Ct. 256 55 L. Ed. 244 LAWRENCE E. SEXTON, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Kessler & Company, Appts., v. LEOPOLD LOUIS DREYFUS, Louis Louis Dreyfus, and Charles Louis Dreyfus, Composing the Firm of Louis Dreyfus & Company. NO 662. SAME v. LLOYDS BANK, Ltd. NO 663. Nos. 662 and 663. Submitted January 6, 1911. Decided January 23, 1911. Messrs. Wallace Macfarlane and George H. Gilman for appellant. [Argument of Counsel from pages 339-341 intentionally omitted] Mr. Frederic R. Coudert...
192 U.S. 355 24 S. Ct. 266 48 L. Ed. 476 UNITED STATES, Appt. , v. CALIFORNIA & OREGON LAND COMPANY NO 4 CALIFORNIA & OREGON LAND COMPANY, Appt. , v. UNITED STATES. NO 5 Nos. 4, 5. Argued March 14, 17, 1902. Ordered for reargument April 21, 1902. Reargued December 9, 10, 1902. Ordered resubmitted to full bench March 16, 1903. Resubmitted March 23, 1903. Ordered for reargument October 26, 1903. Reargued January 5, 6, 7, 1904. Decided February 1, 1904. Mr. Charles W. Russell for the United States....
186 U.S. 24 (1902) MONTANA MINING COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. MONTANA MINING COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. Nos. 213, 214. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 9, 1902. Decided May 19, 1902. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *29 Mr. W.E. Cullen and Mr. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., for plaintiff in error. Mr. Edward C. Day, Mr. Aldis B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton were on their brief. Mr. Thomas C. Bach and...
183 U.S. 535 (1902) UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. NEW MEXICO. NEW MEXICO v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY. Nos. 181, 182. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 30, 31, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. CROSS APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. *539 Mr. C.N. Sterry for appellants. Mr. E.D. Kenna and Mr. Robert Dunlap were on his brief. Mr. F.W. Clancy for appellee. MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. The district court...
183 U.S. 519 (1902) SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. Nos. 18 and 24. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 29, 30, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. CROSS APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *520 Mr. Joseph H. Call for the United States. Mr. Maxwell Evarts and Mr. L.E. Payson for appellants. MR. JUSTICE BREWER delivered the opinion of the court. On May 14, 1894, the United States filed in...
184 U.S. 123 (1902) UNITED STATES v. BARLOW. BARLOW v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 127, 128. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 23, 1902. Decided February 24, 1902. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *132 Mr. George Hines Gorman for the United States. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt was on his brief. Mr. George A. King for Barlow. Mr. Rufus H. Thayer was on his brief. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. The principal claim of...
185 U.S. 256 (1902) UNITED STATES v. GREEN. CHRISTIE v. UNITED STATES. Nos. 109, 129. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 27, 28, 1902. Decided April 28, 1902. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. *264 Mr. John W. Griggs and Mr. Francis J. Henry for appellants in No. 129, and appellees in No. 109. Mr. William H. Pope and Mr. Matthew G. Reynolds for the United States. Mr. Solicitor General was on their brief. Mr. Rochester Ford filed a brief for the United States and for...
185 U.S. 155 (1902) HITZ v. JENKS. No. 99. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 15, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Mr. A.S. Worthington and Mr. Wayne Mc Veagh for appellant. Mr. J.S. Flannery was on their brief. Mr. Walter D. Davidge and Mr. J.J. Darlington for appellees. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN delivered the opinion of the court. The property involved in this suit is certain improved real estate on the northeast corner of...
184 U.S. 524 (1902) MONROE v. UNITED STATES. No. 98. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted January 14, 1902. Decided March 10, 1902. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *526 Mr. John C. Fay for appellants. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt and Mr. Franklin W. Collins for appellees. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. We agree with counsel that the question in the case is a narrow one. It is not denied that the approval of the Chief of Engineers was necessary to the legal...
184 U.S. 598 (1902) BUSCH v. JONES. No. 96. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 14, 1902. Decided March 17, 1902. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. *599 Mr. George J. Murray for appellant. Mr. M.W. Jacobs for appellees. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. 1. A question of jurisdiction is raised. It is contended by appellant that the case was not one of equitable cognizance, the appellees' remedy being, it is claimed, at law. The...
184 U.S. 71 (1902) McDONALD v. THOMPSON. No. 95. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 13, 14, 1902. Decided February 3, 1902. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *72 Mr. J.R. Webster for appellant. Mr. John H. Ames and Mr. A.E. Harvey filed a brief for same. Mr. Halleck F. Rose for appellee. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court. This bill is founded upon Rev. Stat., ยง 5151, which declares that "the...
184 U.S. 290 (1902) HUGULEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GALETON COTTON MILLS. No. 94. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 15, 1902. Decided February 24, 1902. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. *294 Mr. John T. Morgan for appellants. Mr. Louis D. Brandeis for appellees. Mr. William H. Dunbar was on his brief. MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court. The act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat. 826, provides in section 6 that...
184 U.S. 329 (1902) CLARK v. TITUSVILLE. No. 91. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted January 14, 1902. Decided March 3, 1902. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. Mr. Eugene Mackey for plaintiff in error. Mr. George Frank Brown for defendant in error, submitted on his brief. *330 MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court. This case is here on error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. It involves the constitutionality of an...
187 U.S. 248 (1902) MENCKE v. CARGO OF JAVA SUGAR. No. 90. Supreme Court of United States. Argued November 13, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *249 Mr. J. Parker Kirlin for petitioner. Mr. Charles R. Hickox was with him on the brief. *250 Mr. Wilhelmus Mynderse for respondents. MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS delivered the opinion of the court. Concerning the facts of the case there is no controversy. The ship Benlarig was chartered under a...
184 U.S. 169 (1902) LYKINS v. McGRATH. No. 90. Supreme Court of United States. Argued and submitted January 13, 1902. Decided February 24, 1902. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. *170 Mr. William M. Springer for plaintiffs in error. Mr. W.C. Perry, Mr. Daniel B. Holmes and Mr. Frank M. Sheridan submitted on their brief. MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court. It is contended by the plaintiffs that the...
183 U.S. 545 (1902) Ex parte WILDER'S STEAMSHIP COMPANY. No. 9, Original. Supreme Court of United States. Submitted May 13, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. *550 Mr. Duane E. Fox for Wilder's Steamship Co. Mr. Charles Page and others, opposing. MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after stating the case as above, delivered the opinion of the court. We are of opinion that the appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the...
187 U.S. 87 (1902) IOWA v. ROOD. No. 9. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 14, 15, 1902. Decided November 17, 1902. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. *90 Mr. Charles Mullan, attorney general of the State of Iowa, for plaintiff in error. Mr. R.M. Wright and Mr. J.P. Dolliver for defendants in error. MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court. Motion is made to dismiss this case upon the ground that no Federal question is...
184 U.S. 247 (1902) UNITED STATES v. ST. LOUIS & MISSISSIPPI VALLEY TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. No. 89. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 10, 13, 1902. Decided February 24, 1902. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. *248 Mr. George Hines Gorman for appellant. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt was on his brief. Mr. James H. Hayden for appellee. Joseph H. McCammon was on his brief. MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court. After the findings...
184 U.S. 111 (1902) CLEVELAND TRUST COMPANY v. LANDER. No. 88. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 10, 1902. Decided February 24, 1902. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. *113 Mr. James Rudolph Garfield for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry A. Garfield and Mr. Frederic C. Howe were on his brief. Mr. P.H. Kaiser for defendant in error. Mr. O.L. Neff was on his brief. MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court. The argument of the...
184 U.S. 173 (1902) MARANDE v. TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 86. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 8, 9, 1902. Decided February 24, 1902. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. *175 Mr. Treadwell Cleveland for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Frederick E. Mygatt and Mr. George Richards were on his brief. Mr. Rush Taggart for defendant in error. Mr. Arthur H. Masten was on his brief. MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion...
